gdp's Comments

Breitbart.tv : Newt Slams NBC Silencing Audience And Reacts To Palin's 'Panties In Wad' Comment

Fri, 27 Jan 2012 19:23:21 +0000

Just saying you don't sound quite so optimistic.

Breitbart.tv : Newt Slams NBC Silencing Audience And Reacts To Palin's 'Panties In Wad' Comment

Fri, 27 Jan 2012 19:23:04 +0000

So, is Obama going to win or lose? Cause just a few weeks ago, some giggling weirdo commenter on this site told me we were about to see the end of progressivism.

Breitbart.tv : Newt Slams NBC Silencing Audience And Reacts To Palin's 'Panties In Wad' Comment

Fri, 27 Jan 2012 19:06:34 +0000

Media haters are hilarious. I suppose it'd be fine if they were in the tank for your favorite.

Breitbart.tv : Newt Slams NBC Silencing Audience And Reacts To Palin's 'Panties In Wad' Comment

Fri, 27 Jan 2012 19:00:22 +0000

Funny, I thought Boss Breitbart was all about the free and open debate. But whatever. Oh and you might want to think about this, too: if you can't get your message to come across as positive without pre-screened friendly crowds cheering for you, chances are the message is pure, beechwood-aged excrement.

Big Journalism : Eric Boehlert's Attempt to Rewrite History of Edwards Scandal Highlights Media Matters' Radical Agen

Tue, 24 Jan 2012 20:01:58 +0000

Um, I didn't hear about Edwards' scandal on Fox or some rightwing blog. It was on the good old fashinoed network news.

Big Journalism : Eric Boehlert's Attempt to Rewrite History of Edwards Scandal Highlights Media Matters' Radical Agen

Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:55:07 +0000

Can we argue about ... oh I see what you did there.

Breitbart.tv : Newt Slams NBC Silencing Audience And Reacts To Palin's 'Panties In Wad' Comment

Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:45:19 +0000

I remember reading that Twitter exchange between Breitbart and Boehlert from a month or two ago and Breitbart said he cares about free debate. So, why should he give a $h!t what anyone posts on here? Heck, he should have liberal articles as well, if all he cares about is free debate.

Breitbart.tv : Newt Slams NBC Silencing Audience And Reacts To Palin's 'Panties In Wad' Comment

Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:21:37 +0000

"It was another attempt by the media to influence the people and how they vote." Yeah, it sucks to actually have nothing to listen to except what a guy says. Heaven forbid we keep the mob mentality away and decide for ourselves individually whether we agree with this guy or not.

Breitbart.tv : Newt Slams NBC Silencing Audience And Reacts To Palin's 'Panties In Wad' Comment

Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:11:04 +0000

Why can't people distinguish between Marxist and fascist?

Breitbart.tv : Cain Out

Thu, 8 Dec 2011 20:40:19 +0000

>"You just can't face the real issues." And I'm the troll? >..." 'alleged' 'bogus redlining' issues?" So, now they were "alleged"-ly bogus? But, your source says they WERE bogus, then drops the ball. Interesting. >"...so uninformed..." Failure to get my news only from far right-wing sources does not make me uninformed; it just means I'm not a far-right-wing hack. >"How do you fight when you know it will be used against you that you didn't 'cooperate'?" If you're in the right, why not fight? How else can you win? And if you DO win, what would it matter that you didn't cooperate? Also, I don't know why you keep bringing up Obama and Clinton when my original premise was bashing Palin. Do you have that little with which to defend her?

Breitbart.tv : Cain Out

Thu, 8 Dec 2011 16:58:13 +0000

Dismantled? How? When? Forced who? Fox News sure doesn't have a problem running with the repeatedly debunked "Secret Muslim" or "anti-Christian" meme. Do you even read the sources you link? It just kind of *says* the claims of redlining were bogus with no proof offered. Then it admits the cases were settled. People with strong cases AND expensive lawyers fight their cases.

Breitbart.tv : Cain Out

Wed, 7 Dec 2011 22:24:55 +0000

Yeah, I contradicted your claim that the media is state-run with the (factually accurate) claim that it's corporate-run. So, does the government run the companies that run the media? I'll let you get back to me on that one...I'm sure someone has a conspiracy *theory* about that, too. I can't believe you're citing freedomworks and expecting me to take it seriously. You literally made me laugh out loud. In that spirit, allow me to offer you a source for my argument, at which I'm sure you'll laugh equally loud. Unfortunately, it's all true. CRA has nothing in their code to force lenders to lend to people with bad credit. http://www.fdic.gov/regulations/community/communi... Me, proven a hack? When did that happen? Was it when I used quotes from key figures in your party to disprove your argument and display their lack of credibility?

Breitbart.tv : Cain Out

Wed, 7 Dec 2011 21:12:29 +0000

-Refuted? When? How? You still haven't backed up your stat on the unemployment rate. -Name calling? When in this thread have I called you a name? -Insults? What, the "tinfoil" thing? Your claim that the state runs the media remains unproven. It still reeks of paranoia. Plus, if it is state-run, then every single corporation owning a media outlet must also be. Again, OWS is against corporate political collusion and corruption. Why you hate them? Major logical disconnect. -Tidy? My "untidy" quote was from longtime GOP hack Donald Rumsfeld. -Deception? Corruption? Greed? My quoted accusations of "deception", "corruption", and "greed" were leveled against predatory lenders (who you claim had no choice) by Sarah Palin in 2008. So was your revered Ms. Palin simply ignorant of the fact that they had no choice, or is your assertion simply false?

Breitbart.tv : Cain Out

Wed, 7 Dec 2011 18:47:32 +0000

Well, at least you're consistent, completely ignoring my key points like last time. And you must have attended the Sean Hannity school of statistical lies. I'm sure you have a non-partisan source. *eyeroll* Go ahead and criticize OWS for leaving a mess. Freedom’s untidy. And free people are free to make mistakes and commit crimes and do bad things. I thought y'all liked freedom over here. Speaking of OWS, why does this site hate them so much? It must be because OWS protestors say things like these: “Darn right it was the predator lenders..." "There was deception there, and there was greed and there is corruption on Wall Street. And we need to stop that." "...that commitment that we have made, and we're going to follow through on that, getting rid of that corruption." "...I think we need to band together and say never again. Never will we be exploited and taken advantage of again by those who are managing our money and loaning us these dollars. We need to make sure that we demand from the federal government strict oversight of those entities in charge of our investments and our savings..."

Breitbart.tv : Cain Out

Tue, 6 Dec 2011 21:03:23 +0000

Mixed metaphors?!?! YOU were the one who mixed them, FFS! It was, however, a trick question, "left-leaning or state-controlled?". The answer is C: Neither. Dude, seriously...WAKE the FV<K UP. "The media" is a very small group of extremely large corporations that own all the newspapers, TV stations, cable companies, ISP's, magazines, et al. Their bias is not to elect democrats; their bias is to make money. Your money and mine. Cripes, even THIS site has corporate sponsors. I'm not surprised this website has such a hard-on against the unions and OWS, when I see that Sam's Club ad at the top of the page. They do what keeps people glued to their TVs/Computers/papers/magazines/whatever, because that's what exposes you to the most commercials. Wachet auf. Despiertate.

Breitbart.tv : Cain Out

Tue, 6 Dec 2011 17:11:02 +0000

So, wait, is the media state-controlled, or is it left-leaning? I mean, if it's state-controlled, then it must have been friendly to Bush when he was in office, right (which they weren't)? But if it's left-leaning, they would have just hushed up the whole Lewinsky scandal(which they didn't). So...which is it? Is the media trying to make the candidates look bad or are they just doing that all by themselves?

Breitbart.tv : Cain Out

Tue, 6 Dec 2011 15:51:28 +0000

Wow dude. That tinfoil must be on too tight...

Breitbart.tv : Cain Out

Mon, 5 Dec 2011 03:05:53 +0000

Ah yes, because that's what will happen when one is in office; one gets to tackle only the problems they want.

Breitbart.tv : Cain Out

Sun, 4 Dec 2011 16:13:25 +0000

She's certainly not pathetic. She can divine foreign policy by staring at the western horizon from her front porch. The woman is some kind of psychic! Oh, and the way she addresses debate topics? How was she ever NOT the Chairwoman of the College Republicans? I mean, when she just refused to discuss the issues presented, and just, like, SAID: "I don't wanna talk about that..." how AWESOME was that? Nothing I like better than the prospect of being governed by someone who, after five minutes of listening to them speak, I can't honestly say to myself, "Nah, this person doesn't watch professional wrestling," or "Nope, this person isn't mentally stimulated by the subtle nuances and complexities of NASCAR."

Big Government : Occupy Nancy Pelosi: The Real 'One Percent' Is America's Political Class

Tue, 22 Nov 2011 17:28:22 +0000

Wow is this ever mutated now. First, what the heck is "one-size-fits-all" legislation? Second, when the heck did I say I favored scrapping the Constitution? I happen to think that our elected officials have a very serious responsibility to serve the entire country, and most of them only see this extending to themselves and their richest constituents. I happen to think that my suggestion is one route to achieving that end, I never said it was the only one. I happen to believe that confederation is a huge mistake, as it would result in serious violence, separate us culturally even more than we already are, and basically annihilate our national security.