<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/682048</link>
		<description>Comments by waywordson</description>
<item>
<title>Big Government : Obama Propaganda Exposed in Issa House Oversight Report is Only the Beginning</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/libertychick/2010/08/17/obama-propaganda-exposed-in-issa-house-oversight-report-is-only-the-beginning/#IDComment93693603</link>
<description>umm, kontora, i don&amp;#039;t have to paint it, (i doubt that original propagandist touched a paint brush) ,   i just run a picture trough my &amp;quot;gimp&amp;quot; program, and i can  recreate that effect in a matter of minutes.   although, it would be sweet, to be able to get the government to pay me to work a mouse on my computer.. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 17:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/libertychick/2010/08/17/obama-propaganda-exposed-in-issa-house-oversight-report-is-only-the-beginning/#IDComment93693603</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : A Response to Mexican President Calderon</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/tmcclintock/2010/05/25/a-response-to-mexican-president-calderon/#IDComment77121100</link>
<description>RSP misquotes t Mclintock, what he said (paraphrased)  is he takes exception to the Mexican president making a speech criticizing the immigration law in a state of the us.  MSMedia critic......in the interest of accuracy, i must point out  you misquoted  RSP as well ,-)    RSP said &amp;quot;While some of my best friends are Mexicans I wouldn&amp;#039;t want one to live next to one&amp;quot;.    ..... I&amp;#039;m not sure i can parse this statement, and it does raise some questions, so RPS..... is it in Mexico  you don&amp;#039;t want Mexicans living next to other Mexicans,? (and how does that work?), or are you calling  for some kind of Mexican homeowner,renter quota in your neighborhood? (that is you don&amp;#039;t mind Mexican neighbors, but only if they live in every other house?)  that being said, I&amp;#039;m not sure if this makes RPS anti-Hispanic, but regardless, his statement makes my brain hurt, so I&amp;#039;m going to go watch cartoons with my toddler for a wile </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 00:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/tmcclintock/2010/05/25/a-response-to-mexican-president-calderon/#IDComment77121100</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : A Response to Mexican President Calderon</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/tmcclintock/2010/05/25/a-response-to-mexican-president-calderon/#IDComment77118419</link>
<description>i voted for McClintock as Governor, but the establishment Cali-kavorkarepublican party decided once again to go with a swartzenrino, and assist the californian Demorats in the states ongoing suicide attempt. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 00:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/tmcclintock/2010/05/25/a-response-to-mexican-president-calderon/#IDComment77118419</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Government:  Destroying Your Wealth a Trillion Dollars at a Time</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/tdelbeccaro/2010/05/25/government-destroying-your-wealth-a-trillion-dollars-at-a-time/#IDComment77103940</link>
<description>P.S. you may deny the roots of your proposed &amp;quot;well regulated capitalism&amp;quot; but its just yet another in the long list of labels given to the same thing (command control economics) and in the modern terms, &amp;quot;just putting lipstick on a pig&amp;quot;   of course you will just provide logical inconsistent evidence, say thats prof, and claim victory, as such, i am not responding to convince you,(as i have noted by your posts on this site, factual evidence has nothing to do with your ideology)   by responding, i am letting you hi-light the worthlessness of your viewpoint by making you defend it with false arguments.  so, i thank you for being the &amp;quot;faithless&amp;quot; opposition to our knowledge of economics,  history, and constitution. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 21:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/tdelbeccaro/2010/05/25/government-destroying-your-wealth-a-trillion-dollars-at-a-time/#IDComment77103940</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Government:  Destroying Your Wealth a Trillion Dollars at a Time</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/tdelbeccaro/2010/05/25/government-destroying-your-wealth-a-trillion-dollars-at-a-time/#IDComment77103463</link>
<description>what is an economy, well, for one, it is a neutral term, and can be characterized as good (prosperous) or bad (impoverished)  the U.S. economy was intended to be free agents, engaging in self interested Enterprise, under the color of just laws, instituted by a Representative republic government, limited by the authority of &amp;quot;God Given&amp;quot; Rights, set down in the Constitution of the United States.   the basis of the constitution is the economic &amp;quot;truth&amp;quot; studied and quantified by Adam smith, (the invisible hand), and the &amp;quot;self evident truths&amp;quot; observed by the founders of the United states.  then their&amp;#039;s the discredited &amp;quot;command control economic&amp;quot; theory&amp;#039;s proposed by Marx, Engels, and lord Keynes.   so, tell me when, and where the theory&amp;#039;s of command control economy has been factualy proved to work, and where the &amp;quot;self evident truths&amp;quot; framed by the founders of the U.S. has not worked?.    </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 21:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/tdelbeccaro/2010/05/25/government-destroying-your-wealth-a-trillion-dollars-at-a-time/#IDComment77103463</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Government:  Destroying Your Wealth a Trillion Dollars at a Time</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/tdelbeccaro/2010/05/25/government-destroying-your-wealth-a-trillion-dollars-at-a-time/#IDComment77090520</link>
<description>&amp;quot;Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc&amp;quot;   mike, you are free to believe what you will. but when you do so without proof of causation, it leads to logical fallacy.   it is an irrefutable FACT that it is overreaching by the progressives in congress, and the &amp;quot;progressive&amp;quot; Obama administrations&amp;#039; policy&amp;#039;s that are the direct cause of the organization of the tea party&amp;#039;s. this fact is supported by the current history of the tea party events, themselves.   in short, you have not offered proof of your assertion of racism with any historical fact... a blind repetition of your assertion is not proof, referring to the &amp;quot;Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc&amp;quot; arguments of any number of &amp;quot;expert&amp;quot; luminaries who give no real evidence, other than your own fallacy (Obama is black, therefore his is opposed because hes black) (G.Garifolio, et all), is not proof.   the only real provable evidence you cite is obama skin color.....  how does this square with the standard set out by the peaceful rebellion against government sponsored racism of the sixty&amp;#039;s   &amp;quot;....i have a dream, that a man will be judged by the content of his character, rather than the color of his skin....&amp;quot; (paraphrasing. M,L. King) </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 19:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/tdelbeccaro/2010/05/25/government-destroying-your-wealth-a-trillion-dollars-at-a-time/#IDComment77090520</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : As SEIU Terrorizes Bank Employee&#039;s Son, HuffPo and MediaMatters Omit Deadbeat Union&#039;s $90 Million De</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/libertychick/2010/05/21/as-seiu-terrorizes-bank-employees-son-huffpo-and-mediamatters-omit-deadbeat-unions-90-million-debt/#IDComment76567629</link>
<description>and as i read the story, at no time did the tea party protesters step foot on private property, that story was actually about Bank of Americas ridiculously overboard security reaction to a peaceful protest, the seiu protest became illegal once a union thugs &amp;quot;jackboot&amp;quot; hit privet property:&amp;quot; as for me i am outraged at the under reaction of the local police, and the media.   </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 21:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/libertychick/2010/05/21/as-seiu-terrorizes-bank-employees-son-huffpo-and-mediamatters-omit-deadbeat-unions-90-million-debt/#IDComment76567629</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Must-Read of the Day: The New Yorker Profiles Andrew Breitbart</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/05/17/must-read-of-the-day-the-new-yorker-profiles-andrew-breitbart/#IDComment75917109</link>
<description>thats amazing, i could only get about a page and a half before my eyes glazed over, and i had to go wash out my brain. &amp;#039;-) </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 03:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/05/17/must-read-of-the-day-the-new-yorker-profiles-andrew-breitbart/#IDComment75917109</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Must-Read of the Day: The New Yorker Profiles Andrew Breitbart</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/05/17/must-read-of-the-day-the-new-yorker-profiles-andrew-breitbart/#IDComment75898178</link>
<description>read every word? how did you develop such Olympian endurance? </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 00:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/05/17/must-read-of-the-day-the-new-yorker-profiles-andrew-breitbart/#IDComment75898178</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Must-Read of the Day: The New Yorker Profiles Andrew Breitbart</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/05/17/must-read-of-the-day-the-new-yorker-profiles-andrew-breitbart/#IDComment75897023</link>
<description>actually, i take it into the exam room, reading the articles puts me to sleep faster than the anesthesia (I must admit, i only got trough one and a half paragraphs of the &amp;quot;Bribart&amp;quot; expose before my head hit the keyboard.      </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 00:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/05/17/must-read-of-the-day-the-new-yorker-profiles-andrew-breitbart/#IDComment75897023</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Must-Read of the Day: The New Yorker Profiles Andrew Breitbart</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/05/17/must-read-of-the-day-the-new-yorker-profiles-andrew-breitbart/#IDComment75888882</link>
<description>it has been pointed out to me that i owe an apology to the &amp;quot;National Inquirer&amp;quot; as my comparison of the two mags unfairly taints the image of the N.E. i have been informed that the new Yorker doesn&amp;#039;t come anywhere close to the level of journalistic integrity commonly to the pages of the national inquirer. ,   although the N.Y. does get points for good grammar.   (and yes i am having to much fun with this) </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 23:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/05/17/must-read-of-the-day-the-new-yorker-profiles-andrew-breitbart/#IDComment75888882</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Must-Read of the Day: The New Yorker Profiles Andrew Breitbart</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/05/17/must-read-of-the-day-the-new-yorker-profiles-andrew-breitbart/#IDComment75864978</link>
<description>typical elitist hit piece.   anyway, i don&amp;#039;t know if any article in the New Yorker really matters, i mean does anyone actually READ this overly wordy and pretentious edition of the &amp;quot;national enquirer&amp;quot; only place Ive ever seen it is in the stack of old warn style magazines that get dumped at the office of my hapless dentist,   i think the author is suffering from reader envy , after all, there web site only gets traffic when Bribart posts the link on his site. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 19:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/05/17/must-read-of-the-day-the-new-yorker-profiles-andrew-breitbart/#IDComment75864978</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Sunday Open Thread: Cash Edition</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/05/16/sunday-open-thread-cash-edition/#IDComment75708945</link>
<description>PS Wes, cant you get away from politics for just one second, relax, and listen to a song by one of Americas great musical icons? (as far as i know Johnny cash wasn&amp;#039;t &amp;quot;political&amp;quot; in any way, his music isn&amp;#039;t &amp;quot;political&amp;quot; in any way.)   you seem to want to frame everything as us vs them. in criticizing the &amp;quot;right wing&amp;quot; for being fans of Jonny Cash, you also include all his &amp;quot;left wing&amp;quot; fans.   </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 21:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/05/16/sunday-open-thread-cash-edition/#IDComment75708945</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Sunday Open Thread: Cash Edition</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/05/16/sunday-open-thread-cash-edition/#IDComment75707056</link>
<description>even though is depressing, and it was written by a leftist (C.C. that is) i cant say the song is a leftist anthem extolling the virtues of getting getting drunk and stoned ...unless you actually LIKE having a hangover...  (&amp;quot;trucking&amp;quot; and other inane &amp;quot;G-Dead songs&amp;quot; are the leftist anthems for the virtues of addiction)   as far as the Man in black, his life is a good example of why not to get drunk and stoned, but more impotently, how to get away from a life of being drunk.   (PS, &amp;quot;Johnny-C&amp;quot; is not known for composing upbeat pop fluff songs, he tends more toward gospel, and the blues) </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 20:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/05/16/sunday-open-thread-cash-edition/#IDComment75707056</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : The Terrorist-Loving Left Is Trying To Destroy Me: Radical-Turned-Hero Brandon Darby on the G. Gordo</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/mvadum/2010/04/30/the-terrorist-loving-left-is-trying-to-destroy-me-radical-turned-hero-brandon-darby-on-the-g-gordon-liddy-show/#IDComment71726599</link>
<description>um, its called freedom of the press, but don&amp;#039;t worry, the progressives are working on eliminating that little annoyance,  </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 1 May 2010 20:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/mvadum/2010/04/30/the-terrorist-loving-left-is-trying-to-destroy-me-radical-turned-hero-brandon-darby-on-the-g-gordon-liddy-show/#IDComment71726599</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : The Terrorist-Loving Left Is Trying To Destroy Me: Radical-Turned-Hero Brandon Darby on the G. Gordo</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/mvadum/2010/04/30/the-terrorist-loving-left-is-trying-to-destroy-me-radical-turned-hero-brandon-darby-on-the-g-gordon-liddy-show/#IDComment71725887</link>
<description>i wish this were true mike, for that would mean Chuck Colson&amp;#039;s Good work was bearing fruit, i do know that prisoners who come to true Christian faith are less likely to re-offend.   unfortunately, its the totalitarian governments of the world who have jails that are stuffed with Christians, most of whom are there just for being Christian.   i notice a trend in your posting mike, privately you seem to be a decent guy,  why attack Christians? (looking at world history, this just puts you in the company of the likes of Hitler, Nero, Stalin, ect...)   as far as your idea of &amp;quot;leftist individual responsibility&amp;quot; Ive seen how that works, those who DEEM  themselves as being intellectually, educationally, and genetically Superior to the unfortunate normal, mentally challenged mob. have a responsibility to control every aspect of the mobs sad, pathetic, mentally challenged lives. (all for there own good of course,) problem with this is your assumption of greater intellect, your estimation of the masses inferiority. bother are lies, and the epitome of arrogant hubris. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 1 May 2010 20:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/mvadum/2010/04/30/the-terrorist-loving-left-is-trying-to-destroy-me-radical-turned-hero-brandon-darby-on-the-g-gordon-liddy-show/#IDComment71725887</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : The Terrorist-Loving Left Is Trying To Destroy Me: Radical-Turned-Hero Brandon Darby on the G. Gordo</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/mvadum/2010/04/30/the-terrorist-loving-left-is-trying-to-destroy-me-radical-turned-hero-brandon-darby-on-the-g-gordon-liddy-show/#IDComment71724025</link>
<description>now mike, you may wish to frame a pithy comment stating that MC-viegh was a Nazi, and that means he was right wing. but in all honesty, All forms of socialism, and socialist governance (i e. communism, Nazism) are in opposition to, and there fore cannot exist in the scope of the constitutionally limited republic governance that is the idea in the US, and there for, are not really legitimate political party&amp;#039;s. being outside of any legal constitutional avenue to enact socialism, tis leaves violence as the only resort for the most fanatic believers in socialism.   the more pragmatic proponents of socialism pretend to be what they aren&amp;#039;t to gain the color of governence or law, and then work tirelessly to re define the launguage, and history of the united states in order render the constitution meaningless.   tell me, if a group of Americans formed the &amp;quot;royalist party&amp;quot; with the intent of bringing the U.S. back into the British Commonwealth, recognizing the authority of the royal line of england as the head of state in the united states, could they be put in the right wing of politics, the left wing, or are they nuts who are properly placed completely off the planet </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 1 May 2010 20:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/mvadum/2010/04/30/the-terrorist-loving-left-is-trying-to-destroy-me-radical-turned-hero-brandon-darby-on-the-g-gordon-liddy-show/#IDComment71724025</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : The Terrorist-Loving Left Is Trying To Destroy Me: Radical-Turned-Hero Brandon Darby on the G. Gordo</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/mvadum/2010/04/30/the-terrorist-loving-left-is-trying-to-destroy-me-radical-turned-hero-brandon-darby-on-the-g-gordon-liddy-show/#IDComment71723962</link>
<description>i don&amp;#039;t know whether Darby is a terrorist or not,  the fact is that he sacrificed much to save life of strangers, and halt the actions of evil men, wich is to his credit. (all it takes for Evil to succeed, is for good men to do nothing)  &amp;quot;MC viegh was actually a former National Socialist, (neo Nazi) and his act of terror was spelled out in the turner diary&amp;#039;s,   </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 1 May 2010 20:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/mvadum/2010/04/30/the-terrorist-loving-left-is-trying-to-destroy-me-radical-turned-hero-brandon-darby-on-the-g-gordon-liddy-show/#IDComment71723962</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : VIDEO:  Who is This Guy?</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/sright/2010/04/29/video-who-is-this-guy/#IDComment71370037</link>
<description>spif, if you look on your moniter, there is a little bliking red light, look into the light and all will be explained! </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 21:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/sright/2010/04/29/video-who-is-this-guy/#IDComment71370037</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : VIDEO:  Who is This Guy?</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/sright/2010/04/29/video-who-is-this-guy/#IDComment71369482</link>
<description>Was there life before the internet? </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 21:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/sright/2010/04/29/video-who-is-this-guy/#IDComment71369482</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>