<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/673521</link>
		<description>Comments by verbatim</description>
<item>
<title>Jewish Daily Forward : Time for Jewish Evangelizing &ndash; Forward.com</title>
<link>http://forward.com/articles/199705/time-for-jewish-evangelizing/#IDComment842924941</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;m just relating what Jewish law states. This is not my opinion. Jews are not supposed to &amp;quot;evangelize&amp;quot; non-Jews. We are permitted to educate other Jews and encourage to return to their faith. But we are told that each person on earth has his or her own mission from G-d. The mission of non-Jews does not include keeping kosher, putting on Tefillin or Yom Kippur. Unless they somehow feel they REALLY need to pursue the idea of converting, we do not go out and try to convert them. Jewish law even says we are supposed to reject them three times. This is to make sure they are sincere in their desire to convert. Jewish law has no problem with someone who might want to convert, they just have to really and sincerely want to do it on their own.   </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2014 02:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://forward.com/articles/199705/time-for-jewish-evangelizing/#IDComment842924941</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jewish Daily Forward : Time for Jewish Evangelizing &ndash; Forward.com</title>
<link>http://forward.com/articles/199705/time-for-jewish-evangelizing/#IDComment841141967</link>
<description>No. Absolutely not. Judaism is not some membership club that needs its numbers pumped up to look good. Anyone is welcome to join. However, it must be THEIR OWN initiative that drives and compels them to join, not the &amp;quot;encouragement&amp;quot; of evangelism. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2014 15:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://forward.com/articles/199705/time-for-jewish-evangelizing/#IDComment841141967</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jewish Daily Forward : Circumcision Gas Station Mural Sparks Protests in Cleveland &ndash; Forward.com</title>
<link>http://forward.com/articles/199628/circumcision-gas-station-mural-sparks-protests-in/#IDComment839741862</link>
<description>&amp;quot;[T]he Cleveland government plans to &amp;#039;explore all legal avenues...&amp;#039;&amp;quot;  Although what this anti-Semite did is terrible, to try to censor free speech, no matter how odious or reprehensible, is the wrong path to go. It then becomes a slippery slope. What happens next if we Jews want to speak out against Islamic extremist terrorism? Will we be made to shut up? </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Jun 2014 21:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://forward.com/articles/199628/circumcision-gas-station-mural-sparks-protests-in/#IDComment839741862</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jewish Daily Forward : The \&#039;Unaffiliated\&#039; Danger Within &ndash; Forward.com</title>
<link>http://forward.com/#IDComment657255128</link>
<description>If you don&amp;#039;t &amp;quot;practice the religion&amp;quot;, it doesn&amp;#039;t make you less a Jew. As long as your mother is Jewish, then you are Jewish. No one can take that away. It makes you less religious. Being &amp;quot;religious&amp;quot; (meaning following the Jewish laws as intended: kosher, Shabbat, marrying someone only Jewish) means that one is claiming fidelity to the historical chain that goes back to Mount Sinai when the Jews, as one group, accepted and received the Torah.    One can say, &amp;quot;I&amp;#039;m spiritual,&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;I&amp;#039;m just a good person.&amp;quot; What do those mean exactly? That&amp;#039;s what Jewish law does. It tells us what being &amp;quot;good&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;spiritual&amp;quot; is.        &amp;quot;And don&amp;#039;t tell me the two are inseparable&amp;quot; -- Before you can claim that &amp;quot;Jewish life&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;practicing the religion&amp;quot; can be seperate, one must define what those two terms mean. What exactly is &amp;quot;Jewish life&amp;quot;? Without a guide, it could mean anything. Or, over time, it could change into something that was never intended. And the same question applies to &amp;quot;practicing the religion&amp;quot;. What does that mean? If everyone has their own definition for either or both, then those people and their &amp;quot;practices&amp;quot; are not bound together, either communally or historically.     An easy example: two people cannot play a game of chess if they each have their own set of rules about how to play. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 7 Jun 2013 23:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://forward.com/#IDComment657255128</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Articles : Hill Poll: Growing Numbers Feel Obama Doesn&#039;t Back Israel Enough</title>
<link>http%3a%2f%2funitycoalitionforisrael.org%2fnews%2f%3fp%3d9104#IDComment586773788</link>
<description>People are only just now figuring this out? Before the election of 2008, I begged my parents not to vote for this guy. I knew exactly what his ideologies would be and exactly what he thought of Israel. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Mar 2013 05:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http%3a%2f%2funitycoalitionforisrael.org%2fnews%2f%3fp%3d9104#IDComment586773788</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Jewish Daily Forward : Attachment Parenting the Source of Mayim Bialik\&#039;s Divorce? &ndash; The Sisterhood &ndash; Forward.c</title>
<link>http://blogs.forward.com/sisterhood-blog/166798/#IDComment505695637</link>
<description>&amp;quot;extreme practice of attachment parenting...&amp;quot; -- what do you find so &amp;quot;extreme&amp;quot; about it. If you think about, it was most probably quite normal and expected back when life was simpler.       &amp;quot;felt a little jolt of schadenfreude&amp;quot; -- jealous people often do.      &amp;quot;But I did find it odd that...Bialik appeared to defend her parenting style&amp;quot; -- HELLO! Kveller is a parenting site! PARENTS and those concerned with parenting techniques read the site and her blog.       Wouldn&amp;#039;t it be natural for those parents reading the site to wonder about it, since she is a proponent of the technique? Besides those parents who know her for this advocacy, do you think the average viewer of &amp;quot;The Big Bang Theory&amp;quot; knows she advocates this technique (hint: probably not).       Sot it would be natural for her to mention this to readers of her blog. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 15:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://blogs.forward.com/sisterhood-blog/166798/#IDComment505695637</guid>
</item><item>
<title>
	Frontpage Magazine
 : Black-on-Jewish Violence in the U.S.A.</title>
<link>http://frontpagemag.com/2012/daniel-greenfield/black-on-jewish-violence-in-the-u-s-a/#IDComment399810366</link>
<description>Jews and Christians alike should both be bothered by this. Jews have had a long history of being pushed around and bullied. Mr. Lechter is just saying we should stop tolerating it.   It is very sad that political correctness has made it permissible to attack Christians. They, too, should be prepared to do what is right and defend themselves. Till recently, Christians have not been attacked the way they are now being attacked by PC. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 14:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://frontpagemag.com/2012/daniel-greenfield/black-on-jewish-violence-in-the-u-s-a/#IDComment399810366</guid>
</item><item>
<title>
	Frontpage Magazine
 : Black-on-Jewish Violence in the U.S.A.</title>
<link>http://frontpagemag.com/2012/daniel-greenfield/black-on-jewish-violence-in-the-u-s-a/#IDComment399808259</link>
<description>No. He&amp;#039;s saying he is sick of being pushed around and wants Jews to defend themselves.   Christians should also be sick of being pushed around by political correctness and be prepared to defend themselves. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 14:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://frontpagemag.com/2012/daniel-greenfield/black-on-jewish-violence-in-the-u-s-a/#IDComment399808259</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Clueless Piers Morgan Can&#039;t Understand Why Romney Won&#039;t Appear on &#039;Tonight&#039;</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/cftoto/2012/02/11/clueless-piers-morgan-cant-understand-why-romney-wont-appear-on-tonight/#IDComment290892304</link>
<description>&amp;quot;I don&amp;#039;t know why&amp;quot; -- let&amp;#039;s just face facts: Piers Morgan is stupid if he can&amp;#039;t figure out why. How &amp;#039;bout those journalism creds! </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 00:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/cftoto/2012/02/11/clueless-piers-morgan-cant-understand-why-romney-wont-appear-on-tonight/#IDComment290892304</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Big Movie Flashback: &#039;The Taking of Pelham One Two Three&#039; (1974)</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2012/02/12/big-movie-flashback-the-taking-of-pelham-one-two-three/#IDComment290763119</link>
<description>Such gritty and real New York of that time period. Definitely one of my favorite movies. And the ending is so classic. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2012/02/12/big-movie-flashback-the-taking-of-pelham-one-two-three/#IDComment290763119</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : &#039;Hope&#039; for a &#039;Change&#039; Need Not Be Abandoned. </title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/dturbull/2012/02/05/hope-for-a-change-need-not-be-abandoned/#IDComment285215410</link>
<description>&amp;quot;And the positive job numbers that were just released, which I am pleased about and believe is a wonderful thing for our country&amp;quot;  I&amp;#039;m sorry, I don&amp;#039;t believe these &amp;quot;positive&amp;quot; numbers. We all know the magic number is somewhere between 7.0 and 7.5% unemployment. You know they will massage and lie those numbers right down till election day when they will magically fall below any &amp;quot;negatively&amp;quot; perceived number.  Allen West: &amp;#039;Is Someone Playing with Unemployment Numbers?&amp;#039;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katehicks/2012/02/03/allen_west_is_someone_playing_with_unemployment_numbers&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katehicks/2012/02/03...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 6 Feb 2012 09:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/dturbull/2012/02/05/hope-for-a-change-need-not-be-abandoned/#IDComment285215410</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : 1 Million to Recall Walker, What It Means</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/mtrackers/2012/01/17/1-million-to-recall-walker-what-it-means/#IDComment267457759</link>
<description>So it doesn&amp;#039;t matter how many times Republicans win in Wisconsin, liberal nut jobs just won&amp;#039;t accept that fact: 1. Gubernatorial election, 2. state recount, 3. state supreme court judge, 4. Union bargaining rights law, 5. attempt to recall state senators, 6. court overcomes attempted block of union bargaining ban.  In other words, crazy libs will not allow the normal flow of law or justice.   To paraphrase their favorite false messiah: &amp;quot;Wisconsin voters won, get over it.&amp;quot; </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 06:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/mtrackers/2012/01/17/1-million-to-recall-walker-what-it-means/#IDComment267457759</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Obama Starts Constitutional Crisis, Installs New Radical Czars</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/tfitton/2012/01/10/obama-starts-constitutional-crisis-installs-new-radical-czars/#IDComment261079641</link>
<description>Why can&amp;#039;t policemen be posted at the front door of whatever office Richard Cordray is supposed to arrive at and arrest him for trespassing and impersonating a government official? Since what the Bamster did has no Constitutional or legal standing, Richard Cordray has no business being on government property. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 06:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/tfitton/2012/01/10/obama-starts-constitutional-crisis-installs-new-radical-czars/#IDComment261079641</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Ellen Barkin Blasts Bloomberg Over #Occupy Arrests, Claims NYPD &#039;Threatened&#039; Her</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2012/01/02/video-ellen-barkin-to-nypd-get-your-mother-fing-hands-off-me/#IDComment252973317</link>
<description>The only way to counter these liberal kooks, is to get EVERYTHING on tape, just like the video above. Now we see, she&amp;#039;s either an out-and-out liar, or her memory is just failing her as she enters the sunset of her years.    Otherwise libs like her will be believed at face value and we&amp;#039;ll be left having to defend ourselves against our &amp;quot;goose-stepping&amp;quot; tactics -- as Ms. Barkin calls it. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 2 Jan 2012 16:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/hollywoodland/2012/01/02/video-ellen-barkin-to-nypd-get-your-mother-fing-hands-off-me/#IDComment252973317</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Moore vs. Miller: Differences on Occupy Wall Street Foreshadowed in Their Breakthrough Graphic Novel</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/rcapshaw/2011/12/31/moore-vs-miller-differences-on-occupy-wall-street-foreshadowed-in-their-breakthrough-graphic-novels/#IDComment251870111</link>
<description>...in a very intelligent, nonviolent way...  I saw the OWS as neither intelligent nor non-violent. Many man-on-the-street interviews revealed that most OWS protestors had little or no idea why they were there. And at last the count, BigGovernment&amp;#039;s OWS rap sheet was growing quite long. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 1 Jan 2012 03:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/rcapshaw/2011/12/31/moore-vs-miller-differences-on-occupy-wall-street-foreshadowed-in-their-breakthrough-graphic-novels/#IDComment251870111</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Hollywood’s Mean Girls: When ‘Feminist’ Actresses Attack Female Conservatives</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/adelgado/2011/12/28/hollywoods-mean-girls-when-feminist-actresses-attack-female-conservatives/#IDComment250529835</link>
<description>That just shows what an ignoramus Ms. Barkin is. EVERY candidate says, &amp;quot;When I&amp;#039;m president....&amp;quot; when on the campaign trail. All candidates need to exude confidence. I want a candidate to talk confidently and resolutely. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 04:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/adelgado/2011/12/28/hollywoods-mean-girls-when-feminist-actresses-attack-female-conservatives/#IDComment250529835</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : When Will Brian Williams Report On Or Even Say &#039;Fast And Furious?&#039;</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/rfutrell/2011/12/21/when-will-brian-williams-report-on-or-even-say-fast-and-furious/#IDComment244635720</link>
<description>It&amp;#039;s actually scary that the State Run Media gets away with this blatantly distorting things.   The sheeple are so unaware. My mom (more than my dad) is so out of it. She half watches the nightly news. I bet most others are the same. They have busy lives and are tired at the end of the day. And they still believe that the news media is doing it&amp;#039;s job of &amp;quot;reporting&amp;quot; the news. So the media can make up whatever lies the want and the sheeple just nod their heads and vote for the Bamster. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 15:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/rfutrell/2011/12/21/when-will-brian-williams-report-on-or-even-say-fast-and-furious/#IDComment244635720</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Evangelize: Obama Campaign Releases Instructional Ad On Propagandizing Conservative Family Members</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/evangelize-obama-campaign-releases-ad-on-how-to-propagandize-conservative-family-members-2/#IDComment243423955</link>
<description>Wow. I guess we all have a part to play: I got my father to open his eyes and see that Obama is anti-semetic and incompetent. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 10:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/evangelize-obama-campaign-releases-ad-on-how-to-propagandize-conservative-family-members-2/#IDComment243423955</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Newt: Pelosi Revealing Ethics Info Is A Violation Of House Rules</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/newt-pelosi-revealing-ethics-info-is-a-violation-of-house-rules/#IDComment233813891</link>
<description>EOD - &amp;quot;Democrats have always viewed the Law as something that other people are forced to follow. &amp;quot;    Liberals also use the law as a bludgeon on people they want to control or destroy. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 6 Dec 2011 19:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/newt-pelosi-revealing-ethics-info-is-a-violation-of-house-rules/#IDComment233813891</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Wisc. Election &#039;Watchdog&#039; Assumes ALL Recall Signatures Are Valid, Will Only Verify Contested Entrie</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/bhealy/2011/11/30/wisc-election-watchdog-assumes-all-recall-signatures-are-valid-will-only-verify-contested-entries/#IDComment230816812</link>
<description>Hey, if libs can crowd source Palin&amp;#039;s emails, why can&amp;#039;t we (along with some die hard Wisconsinites) crowd source all those petition sheets?      We already know libs are going to astro-turf those petitions, so finding fraud should be like shooting fish in a barrel (oops, is that too much violent rhetoric?) </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Dec 2011 06:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/bhealy/2011/11/30/wisc-election-watchdog-assumes-all-recall-signatures-are-valid-will-only-verify-contested-entries/#IDComment230816812</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>