<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/280659</link>
		<description>Comments by Chris</description>
<item>
<title>the unequivocal notion : Friday 3.27</title>
<link>http://unequivocalnotion.com/2009/03/friday-327/#IDComment17704920</link>
<description>&lt;i&gt;(I&amp;#039;m working on getting the notifications working -- bear w/ me)&lt;/i&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://unequivocalnotion.com/2009/03/friday-327/#IDComment17704920</guid>
</item><item>
<title>the unequivocal notion : Friday 3.27</title>
<link>http://unequivocalnotion.com/2009/03/friday-327/#IDComment17701865</link>
<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://voices.idahostatesman.com/2009/03/26/krichert/bloodshed_will_pursue_you#comment-293645&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;As Julie said at Richert&amp;#039;s place&lt;/a&gt;, it will end up being a blogger who does it (&lt;a href=&quot;http://idablue.blogspot.com/2008/07/idaho-values-alliance.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;it was last time too&lt;/a&gt;).    Problem is when a blogger does it it only get&amp;#039;s play in the blogosphere, not in the media -- the media likes to pick and choose what information they lift and not attribute back to blogs.    Fischer is divisive and helps with their page views, hence they aren&amp;#039;t eager to have a reason to not quote him.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 16:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://unequivocalnotion.com/2009/03/friday-327/#IDComment17701865</guid>
</item><item>
<title>the unequivocal notion : A Wednesday brew: Redhook Ale&#039;s Slim Chance</title>
<link>http://unequivocalnotion.com/2009/03/a-wednesday-brew-redhook-ales-slim-chance/#IDComment17697482</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;ll do what I can. I&amp;#039;ve got a good one for today. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://unequivocalnotion.com/2009/03/a-wednesday-brew-redhook-ales-slim-chance/#IDComment17697482</guid>
</item><item>
<title>the unequivocal notion : Friday 3.27</title>
<link>http://unequivocalnotion.com/2009/03/friday-327/#IDComment17696822</link>
<description>I hope it passes too, it&amp;#039;s needed legislation. I just like to point out that the legislature is pro-biz sometimes and pro-consumer others, but they always claim to be pro-biz. I mean, if we don&amp;#039;t need to regulate day cares because that could hurt business and it&amp;#039;s intrusive, why would they regulate lenders?  I mean, what&amp;#039;s a child&amp;#039;s life compared to someone taking out a $200 payday loan and getting ripped off? </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://unequivocalnotion.com/2009/03/friday-327/#IDComment17696822</guid>
</item><item>
<title>the unequivocal notion : Friday 3.27</title>
<link>http://unequivocalnotion.com/2009/03/friday-327/#IDComment17696383</link>
<description>Indeedy. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://unequivocalnotion.com/2009/03/friday-327/#IDComment17696383</guid>
</item><item>
<title>the unequivocal notion : Friday 3.27</title>
<link>http://unequivocalnotion.com/2009/03/friday-327/#IDComment17695961</link>
<description>Oh I agree, it&amp;#039;s a handsome salary for sending out a daily email and being a pain in the ass of Idaho Legislators. I&amp;#039;d love to see his 990&amp;#039;s, would be good reading I&amp;#039;m sure. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 14:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://unequivocalnotion.com/2009/03/friday-327/#IDComment17695961</guid>
</item><item>
<title>the unequivocal notion : Friday 3.27</title>
<link>http://unequivocalnotion.com/2009/03/friday-327/#IDComment17695132</link>
<description>It came up last year when he was a&amp;#039; beggin&amp;#039; for funds, I know he pulls down 50k in salary, or at least used to. I&amp;#039;m trying to track down my old emails on the subject, but the IVA is a pretty small organization, much smaller than the media gives them credit for. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 14:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://unequivocalnotion.com/2009/03/friday-327/#IDComment17695132</guid>
</item><item>
<title>the unequivocal notion : Thursday 3.26</title>
<link>http://unequivocalnotion.com/2009/03/thursday-326/#IDComment17639216</link>
<description>Yes, but... I really don&amp;#039;t agree with seminary during school hours either, that&amp;#039;s something they should save for their own time, not the schools. And I think we all know why certain kids choose to attend seminary... </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 19:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://unequivocalnotion.com/2009/03/thursday-326/#IDComment17639216</guid>
</item><item>
<title>the unequivocal notion : Thursday 3.26</title>
<link>http://unequivocalnotion.com/2009/03/thursday-326/#IDComment17637240</link>
<description>That&amp;#039;s kinda how I approach my situation. I eat pretty much all vegan at home and what I enjoy when we go out. It kinda forces the moderation. I remember when we used to eat steak 1 or 2 times a week, plus sausage, hamburgers... etc... etc. Without having any animal products in the house it makes it harder to consume the things that aren&amp;#039;t as good for you.  I do miss the in-house cheese though... even more than the in-house meat. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://unequivocalnotion.com/2009/03/thursday-326/#IDComment17637240</guid>
</item><item>
<title>the unequivocal notion : Thursday 3.26</title>
<link>http://unequivocalnotion.com/2009/03/thursday-326/#IDComment17637131</link>
<description>I think learning about the world&amp;#039;s religions is a useful glass, akin to learning about the the world&amp;#039;s history. I don&amp;#039;t think it is wise to teach classes that are indoctrinating, like seminary, just one that teaches &amp;quot;real&amp;quot; history of the world&amp;#039;s religions. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://unequivocalnotion.com/2009/03/thursday-326/#IDComment17637131</guid>
</item><item>
<title>the unequivocal notion : Thursday 3.26</title>
<link>http://unequivocalnotion.com/2009/03/thursday-326/#IDComment17628795</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;ve always thought that a &amp;quot;religious studies&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;history of religion&amp;quot; class should be mandatory for public education, on the high school level. I mean, we can&amp;#039;t ignore that religion plays a role in our society. Perhaps if different religions understood where other religions came from and what they believe in then we wouldn&amp;#039;t have half the religious problems that we have today. I wish I could have taken a class that explained Christianity, Islam, Mormonism, Hinduism, Buddhism, and Native American beliefs, etc... etc... In high school the belief philosophy that I learned about on my own was Taoism -- I still believe in it strongly today. However, I don&amp;#039;t exercise it as much as I should, but I realize this.  Of course, due to the very nature of people believing that &amp;quot;their&amp;quot; religion should be the &amp;quot;only religion&amp;quot; this will never happen. &lt;i&gt;sign...&lt;/i&gt;  And yeah, I think it should be taught along side mythology, because essentially, they are the same thing. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://unequivocalnotion.com/2009/03/thursday-326/#IDComment17628795</guid>
</item><item>
<title>the unequivocal notion : Thursday 3.26</title>
<link>http://unequivocalnotion.com/2009/03/thursday-326/#IDComment17627031</link>
<description>Exactly. That&amp;#039;s one of the huge problems I have with Republican and Conservative ideology, they only support local control as long as they are in control, if they don&amp;#039;t have control they want the next highest body that they control to make decisions.  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://unequivocalnotion.com/2009/03/thursday-326/#IDComment17627031</guid>
</item><item>
<title>the unequivocal notion : Wednesday 3.25</title>
<link>http://unequivocalnotion.com/2009/03/wednesday-325/#IDComment17609023</link>
<description>I won&amp;#039;t if you bring me 1, or 2 or 6 back. Always need a good supply of beer-ya-can&amp;#039;t-get-here. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 03:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://unequivocalnotion.com/2009/03/wednesday-325/#IDComment17609023</guid>
</item><item>
<title>the unequivocal notion : Wednesday 3.25</title>
<link>http://unequivocalnotion.com/2009/03/wednesday-325/#IDComment17608402</link>
<description>Yeah, and it&amp;#039;s vegan friendly, so that helps us out with the you-know-who dept. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 02:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://unequivocalnotion.com/2009/03/wednesday-325/#IDComment17608402</guid>
</item><item>
<title>the unequivocal notion : Chipotle black bean sausage</title>
<link>http://unequivocalnotion.com/2009/03/chipotle-black-bean-sausage/#IDComment17608139</link>
<description>lol, yeah figured it would give it some crunch. Does taste pretty good and mighty filling. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 02:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://unequivocalnotion.com/2009/03/chipotle-black-bean-sausage/#IDComment17608139</guid>
</item><item>
<title>the unequivocal notion : Wednesday 3.25</title>
<link>http://unequivocalnotion.com/2009/03/wednesday-325/#IDComment17595299</link>
<description>I hope they don&amp;#039;t pass it either, but I really wouldn&amp;#039;t hold my breath.  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 22:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://unequivocalnotion.com/2009/03/wednesday-325/#IDComment17595299</guid>
</item><item>
<title>the unequivocal notion : ...and yet another site update</title>
<link>http://unequivocalnotion.com/2009/03/and-yet-another-site-update/#IDComment17579679</link>
<description>Thanks, I&amp;#039;m glad some enjoy it. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 16:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://unequivocalnotion.com/2009/03/and-yet-another-site-update/#IDComment17579679</guid>
</item><item>
<title>the unequivocal notion : ...and yet another site update</title>
<link>http://unequivocalnotion.com/2009/03/and-yet-another-site-update/#IDComment17579676</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;ll try to, but I&amp;#039;ve only got so much time. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 16:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://unequivocalnotion.com/2009/03/and-yet-another-site-update/#IDComment17579676</guid>
</item><item>
<title>the unequivocal notion : ...and yet another site update</title>
<link>http://unequivocalnotion.com/2009/03/and-yet-another-site-update/#IDComment17565908</link>
<description>Thanks, I appreciate it Nick. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://unequivocalnotion.com/2009/03/and-yet-another-site-update/#IDComment17565908</guid>
</item><item>
<title>the unequivocal notion : Tuesday morning coffee</title>
<link>http://unequivocalnotion.com/2009/03/tuesday-morning-coffee-8/#IDComment17543351</link>
<description>That is indeed a must read. Thanks Eric.   (for those of you non-tech inclined you&amp;#039;ll need to remove the &amp;quot;url&amp;quot; when you click Eric&amp;#039;s link) </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 02:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://unequivocalnotion.com/2009/03/tuesday-morning-coffee-8/#IDComment17543351</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>