en-us https://www.intensedebate.com/users/325415 Comments by tscottme http://tv.breitbart.com/abc-news-staffer-warns-gop-against-obamacare-repeal/#IDComment119080234 Right., because as we all know the angry voters were demanding Dems/Repubs work together and get MORE things done. Remember all of the protest signs of "Just Do More" Listen, everyone should put efforts into shaming anyone that lamestream media. this mass media is the opiate of the gullible and ill-informed. Too many conservatives still allow the commie-lib media to set the agenda each day. In every way reject and ignore the commie-libs setting the agenda, who cares what the courtiers in the media say about anything? Sat, 1 Jan 2011 21:14:22 +0000 http://tv.breitbart.com/abc-news-staffer-warns-gop-against-obamacare-repeal/#IDComment119080234 http://bigjournalism.com/mdake/2010/10/12/maddow-cant-take-criticism-during-interview-with-republican-candidate/#IDComment103803743 Thanks Rachel, Art Robinson just got a donation from me. Wed, 13 Oct 2010 11:13:19 +0000 http://bigjournalism.com/mdake/2010/10/12/maddow-cant-take-criticism-during-interview-with-republican-candidate/#IDComment103803743 http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2010/09/15/shock-audio-facing-obligations-from-leadership-democrat-house-member-puts-the-squeeze-on-lobbyist/#IDComment99116390 Racism is disagreeing with a liberal about some matter that may or may not touch on race. In fact liberals have a label to cover any opposition, it's SIXHIRB. You are either sexist, intolerant, xenophobic,homophobic,islamophobic, racist, or bigoted. By definition, opposition to liberals or their Utopian plans is only because of some primitive character defect and never because of any substance, just ask a liberal. Thanks to Dennis Prager for the SIXHIRB. Thu, 16 Sep 2010 09:23:44 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2010/09/15/shock-audio-facing-obligations-from-leadership-democrat-house-member-puts-the-squeeze-on-lobbyist/#IDComment99116390 http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/08/20/world-net-dailys-managing-editor-david-kupelian-offers-additional-facts-on-coulter-speech-cancellation/#IDComment94490148 Remember Joseph Farah was the guy saying before one of the more prominent Sept 11 annivesaries that Al Qaeda had suitcase nukes and would unleash them to commemorate the aniversary. He said this despite the historical and technical reasons to seriously doubt even one of the old USSR suitcase nukes would still be viable or that ANY of the USSR nukes was missing. The Seymour Hersh types, fake but accurate, have been mis-reporting the missing nuke story for years. Anyway, during Joseph Farah's 15 minutes of fame based on his intelligence from deep sources he claimed that if his story was wrong nobody should take him seriously again. That's what I've since concluded about Farah and WND. Some of their stories do turn out to be accurate, but their model is report/predict everything and eventually you might be right. Hopefully, the remaining audience will forget WND has been wrong so many times. Sat, 21 Aug 2010 04:00:26 +0000 http://www.newsrealblog.com/2010/08/20/world-net-dailys-managing-editor-david-kupelian-offers-additional-facts-on-coulter-speech-cancellation/#IDComment94490148 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027194.php#IDComment30550900 There is a difference between someone innocently associating with people on one cause not knowing some in league with him on that cause are unsavory. Anyone since Sept 11 who refuses to seriously investigate if they are being used by the jihadist is willfully ignorant and a tool of the jihad. Any conservative that doesn't confront Norquist, when they have the opportunity, is complicit in letting the fifth column get deeper in to our defenses. Come on Michelle Malkin, do the right thing, one more time. Wed, 12 Aug 2009 19:47:30 +0000 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027194.php#IDComment30550900 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027151.php#IDComment29980911 Liberals, at least since the 1960s, have not been about any principle other than justifying their current opinion in the language of "principles." Ending racism isn't about treating people the same, it's about taking power from liberal enemies and giving power to liberal allies. Or, if you prefer, we will end racism by being racist to the right people. Why do you think the ACLU will parachute into Alabama to root out all talk of the Ten Commandments and also sue governments to teach Islam in elementary schools? NOW will batter wives and girlfriends of powerful allies engaged in sexual harrassment and crucify Packwood for patting someone on the tush. AARP will bankrupt the nation to give drugs to seniors and euthanize seniors to pass socialized medicine. Fri, 7 Aug 2009 21:56:05 +0000 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/027151.php#IDComment29980911 http://jihadwatch.org/#IDComment29017085 "I wasn't there. If I was there I didn't shoot anyone. If I did shoot anyone it was in self-defense." Fri, 31 Jul 2009 21:30:56 +0000 http://jihadwatch.org/#IDComment29017085 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026986.php#IDComment28193136 Leftists groups like ALA, ACLU, NOW, PETA, NRDC will happily put aside their supposed causes to advance their far left agenda. It's time for conservatives to stop being confused about this. It's also past time for conservatives to stop pretending that if they just clearly show that some gorup is abandoning some core principle that will convince anyone of anything. The "moderates" aren't interested in the outcome of this grlobal struggle, they just want people to be polite or stop interrupting their TV programs with scary news bulletins. The memebers of the Left won't abandone any of these groups in significant numbers even if the leaders of the gorups are videotaped admitting to some leftwing conspiracy to enslave all of us to whatever power is currently working against us. The Left is easily willing to burn Western Civilization to the ground to prove a point and we are all nothing more than the eggs thatmust be broken to produce some utopian omelet. It's time for supporters of Westenn Civ to get in people's faces and make an ugly situation. The members of the Left are usually quite afraid if even the mildest physical confrontation and we must use that. We have to moblize like the NAACP outraged over some racial comment. Get angry, get close, and let them wonder if they are safe. Fri, 24 Jul 2009 09:55:50 +0000 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026986.php#IDComment28193136 http://jihadwatch.org/#IDComment27107276 ALA is just another leftist organization that would rather work to tear down the country than promote it's narrow organizational interest. It's like NOW supporting Bill Clinton. NOW, ACLU, PETA, ALA, et al are just wearing different uniforms as they swing a sledge hammer at the Statue of Liberty. NOW can be for or against rights of women, depending on whether that stance promotes or hinders the revolution. ACLU, isn't fighting for civil rights, they are using civil rights fights to keep predators on the streets weakening the country. PETA doesn't care about animals, they use the fight for protection of animals to wear down the country. ALA doesn't care about the importance of libraries to communities, they use the support for libraries as a trojan horse to get the country's enemies inside the gates. You can be sure that soon after a Leftist is heard lecturing you on why you must do something you will hear them lecturing why you must now NOT do the same thing they previously lectured you about. Anti-dscrimination laws weren't about eding discrimination, they were about writing the laws so that the right people could be discriminated against. The liberals are the enemy and they plan on giving us over to whatever enemy can make them the best offer. Mon, 13 Jul 2009 08:24:02 +0000 http://jihadwatch.org/#IDComment27107276 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026899.php#IDComment26986631 Liberal groups like the ACLU, NOW, PETA, ALA, etc. don't defend a set of ideals wherever thatmay lead. These groups have simply adopted specific subjects and fight to demolish the West through waging war over those subjects. Think of Luddites throwing their tools and shoes into industrial looms to thwart the industrial revolution. These social luddites just specialize in throwing their specific tool and shoes into the machinery of The West. You can reliably assume the ALA will now move from discussing Islam's influence in the US to defending Islam in the US. There is no enemy of Western Civ that the left won't support because their real effort isn't to improve civil rights, women's rights, etc. their effort is to destroy the culture of the West. Sat, 11 Jul 2009 19:23:38 +0000 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026899.php#IDComment26986631 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026416.php#IDComment23213696 You can't take a statement by Obama or his spokesmen as evidence of intent. He frequently says whatever is popular. to take the heat off of him, and then does what a hard leftist would do thereafter. You might as well proclaim "abusive husband says the beatings will stop, and this time he means it." Wed, 3 Jun 2009 18:57:40 +0000 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026416.php#IDComment23213696 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026378.php#IDComment23048034 Radio talkshow host Dennis Prager mentioned recently that the enduring character of the Left, since Marx, has been denial of the facts of life. Among these are men and women are identical, all cultures are equal, socialism will work, etc. The Left is willing to burn the world to the ground in pursuit of a feeling about their self. As Keith Olberman recently said about Dick Cheney, even if his ideas were proven true by evidence and witnesses they would still be wrong. The Left's ideology is similar to a suicidal depression that overcomes a person. Islamism is like Ebola. The latter will kill you and the former just constantly degrades your will to live until you end it yourself. Tue, 2 Jun 2009 09:34:03 +0000 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026378.php#IDComment23048034 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026272.php#IDComment22259942 It doesn't do much good for non-Muslims to pronounce the jihad against Starbucks as insane, the whole jihad is insane. If jihadis, or other Muslims, were susceptible to rational analysis of their jihadi efforts they would be engaging in jihad, providing aid and comfort for jihad. These efforts by Muslims are simply to put more and more of Western Civ under threat and make non_muslims ever watchful for slights to Islam to promote the dhimmitude Muslims have waiting for us. It's a fool's errand to expect that someday Muslims in Western lands will do something so shocking that the West will rise up and confront Islam. Sept 11 should have been the only event necessary. Those people in the West unconvinced abouth the threat of Islam are those people that have chosen to remanin unconvinced. They will never be convinced. Mon, 25 May 2009 18:19:26 +0000 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026272.php#IDComment22259942 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026147.php#IDComment21688082 There is no principle or idea in which the Left believes that they will honor even when it harms them. The untrained eye may be fooled because Leftists routinely favor ideas and practices which hurt the USA or vital pieces of Western Civ, but that is acceptable to the Left because they don't see the USA or Western Civ as being on the same side as the Left. The truth is if you watch carefully NOW will sacrifice rights of women, ACLU will sacrifice civil liberties, GreenPeace will sacrifice the environment, UAW will sacrifice workers, etc., etc. This is why the American with a desire for liberty must not be fooled and engage the Left is discussion of the details of this policy or that policy, the discussion is just a delaying tactic of the Left while they pursue their destruction of Western Civ. We cannot afford to treat Leftists, and their liberal fellow-travelers, as mere opponents in an important argument. These groups are mortal enemies and must not be trusted to act in any manner other than as an enemy in our midst. It matters not if Leftists/liberals know they are actively trying to ruin Western Civ or if they ruin Western Civ by coincidence. If you are in a lifeboat it doesn't make much difference if the crazy guy demanding to punch a whole in the boat bottom wants to do it to "let out the bilge water" or to sink the boat. Either way his actions will kill everyone in the lifeboat. You don't let that crazy guy have anything sharp or work alone near anything important. Sun, 17 May 2009 06:21:12 +0000 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/026147.php#IDComment21688082 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/025916.php#IDComment20380896 You cannot act in such a way as to avoid being called a fascist,crypto-nazi, by the likes of CJ et al. People that don't understand the psychology of these lunatics think the charges must be based on something, nobody would make up the false association and nobody would see it where it does not exist to win an argument, yet that is exactly what emotion-driven people do routinely. It's like a child claiming every ungappy parental intrusion as "unfair" There is no analysis of the situation and comparison to some standard of fairness with the "unfair" declaration following. I would want the same hellish consequences applied to any and all nazis as I would want the same applied to every radical Muslim. But I will not abandon anyone and everyone someone calls a nazi. Using the six-degrees technique of CJ there is nobody who is not a nazi. and excluding everyone someone calls a nazi is a good way to give victory to jihadists. Following the conspiracy thinking of kooks for years on harmless subjects like UFO and Y2K you cannot get into their worldview and talk them out of the conspiracy. Everything that happens and does not happen is proof of their internal conspiracy theory. "Proof" is proof and lack of proof is proof of the cover-up "You wouldn't so vigorously deny being a nazi sympathizer unless there were serious questions about your affiliations." All you can do is correct their factual errors and show their mental imbalance. The kooks like CJ will eventually destroy themself. Fri, 1 May 2009 20:11:46 +0000 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/025916.php#IDComment20380896 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/025845.php#IDComment19942794 I think Robert's latest response is the best approach to CJ and his libelblog. While I urge everyone refrain from giving more attention and publicity to the libelblog, refer to it but don't name it, Robert is right that the false accusations must be refuted or they will become understood as true as the context of the conflict between the libelblog and CJ's target of the moment fade. Google searches don't give context. A factual refutation of the specifics of the latest libelblog post without naming the internet's Dan Rather is best. Something fundamental is causing the CJ smear campaign. I don't know if he's cynically trying to generate traffic, fulfilling a work assignment from CAIR, become smitten with a Muslim honeypot, or he's having a mental/emotional breakdown. There are past posts which suggest any of these. If CJ was covering this controversy, rather than creating it, he'd certainly discover he's a jihadist or jihadist sympathyzer, using his own reasoning, since he's getting support from CAIR as he spirals into oblivion. Every anti-jihadist is being asked to drive the crypto-nazis from their midst, CJ will tell you who those are after the fact and indict you for not preemptively applying the CJ standards of evidence, while what's his name is CAIR's newest BFF. Either way, the best response is to avoid sending him traffic and banishing him to obscurity. This world doesn't need one more loser trying to earn a living with the Jerry Springer technique of just becoming more and more outrageous and irresponsible as the audience becomes more and more desensitized to the past outrages. If you can live without news of the latest delusion that creationists are taking over the world, there's zero reason to visit the libelblog. One or two JW regulars ought to monitor it for the latest libel, but regular JW readers should not give him traffic for the same reason it's best to avoid network TV news reports. "Fake but accurate" may be good enough for them, but not the rest of us. Sun, 26 Apr 2009 09:18:49 +0000 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/025845.php#IDComment19942794 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/025829.php#IDComment19913109 CJ is the Dan Rather of the internet, fake but accurate. Sat, 25 Apr 2009 19:38:56 +0000 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/025829.php#IDComment19913109 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/025826.php#IDComment19864920 CJ has become the Dan Rather of the internet, "fake but accurate". He's making up stories, forging the details to libel honest people, but it's OK because the thinks it is in service to a higher truth, or maybe it's just in service to his paymasters at CAIR. Either way, if you are dumb enough to boost LGF traffic you deserve to be lied to. Sat, 25 Apr 2009 03:53:45 +0000 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/025826.php#IDComment19864920 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/025810.php#IDComment19793924 LGF is either so frequently dishonest and incorrect about so many people, blogs, and groups as to be worth avoiding or LGF is trying the oldest gimmick in marketing, create a controversy to draw attention to your otherwise unremarkable product. In either case people should stop mentioning him, so as to make it easy for new readers to find him, and stop discussing him. I understand why it's important to defend oneself from the libel of CJ but perhaps the best way to do that is through explanations why JW supports various groups. Be sure to specifically debunk the libels CJ hurls at JW and the other groups without mentioning CJ's charges. The suddeness and the ferocity with which his campaign to label everyone but himself as a crypto nazi or creationist just smells too much like some lame publicity stunt. If most of the anti-jihadist blogs are busy arguing against the LGF libels that must drive traffic to LGF. CJ has had nothing interesting to post for months and I fail to see how increasing the number of anti-creationist posts will change that. CJ has become the Dan Rather or the Maury Povich of the blogosphere, depending on which libel he's focusing on at the time. He's Dan Rather, fake but accurate, when he's creating false accusations against anti-jihad giants like Robert. And he's Maury Povich, filling dead air time with earth-shaking revelations like who's the father of this white trash baby, when he's focusing on creationist who lobby textbook committees <shudder> Don't fall victim to his game by boosting his standing every time he prints another fantasy. Shame anyone you know that reads LGF, especially those that read it like some people claim to read the National Enquirer, just to see how outrageous are the fake stories. There is no good reason to increase his traffic. Don't be a rubber-necker on the internet keep your attention focused on the serous work ahead and just drive past the temper tantrum in his cul-de-sac. Fri, 24 Apr 2009 10:21:47 +0000 http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/025810.php#IDComment19793924 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/tslagle/2009/04/22/re-janeane-garofalo-is-crap/#IDComment19727211 And now that us conservatives have example #43,908 that liberals are everything they accuse of us being now what? So much of the conservative pundocracy and blogoshpere seems no more than boy scouts sniffing that those Hell's Angels riding throuh town throwing fire bombs and shooting people just don't have the social graces they will need if those gang members ever decide to apply for membership at the country club. Yet, no matter how stark and frequent the latest example of liberal viciousness and often outright treachery is documented everyone has to bend over backward to pretend liberals just don't know they are wrecking the country's institutions, aiding our mortal enemies, and laying the groundwork for total national collapse. Liberals are waging a civil war against America and we are their target. Liberals deserve no benefit of the doubt and they must be challanged every time they open their pie hole in public. We must make them become as weary of argument and defending the indefensible as they were able to do when they began their long march through America's public and private spaces. Liberals are mortal threat to the country and anyone that wants to preserve their liberty. Any liberal you think just doesn't know the consequences of his proposal ought to know the consequences by now. He would know the inevitable consequences of liberal policy were he the slightest bit interested in the consequences. The few that truly don't know what they are bringing to us are willfully ignorant in the same way German civilians living near the Nazi death camps willfully ignored the stench belching from the smokestacks and the constant inflow of prisoners arriving by cattle car and yet no trains ever left. The liberals you hope would change if only they knew what the hard-core fifth-column were doing are no more honorable than those Germans. Liberals shouldn't have a moment's peace anywhere they happen to be, treat them like PETA treats models in fur coats, treat them like Code Pink treats a General, treat them like Marxists/Anarchists treat a banker. They should be hounded, harassed, and if they fear for their safety don't be so quick to assure them. They deserve no more respect than someone trying to open the door of an airliner in mid-flight. It doesn't matter if that person intends to kill us all or just kills us all because we wanted fresh air. The passengers are dead either way and making excuses for that person so as to avoid taking action is just as immoral as talking the United Flt #93 passengers out of resisting wold have been. Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:39:19 +0000 http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/tslagle/2009/04/22/re-janeane-garofalo-is-crap/#IDComment19727211