<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/566367</link>
		<description>Comments by tristanrenaud</description>
<item>
<title>Real Story Group: Content Management, Enterprise Search, and Portal Reports : Trends: Clickability shows how not to write a white paper</title>
<link>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/1635-Clickability-White-Paper-Mess#IDComment26203797</link>
<description>I don&amp;#039;t know if Clickability quoted mistakenly CMS Watch on purpose, but if they did, that was really brilliant! What a nice way to advertise for free your brand in a world of so many relatively similar products. What matters is just to get the lights on you. &amp;quot;Bravo&amp;quot; to John Girard and his team: they teached the community how to behave in a web 2.0 world. Let&amp;#039;s be subversive, people will speak about you. Sad thing, the analysts want to promote fairness, objectivity and ethic, but are promoting therefore those who behave not according to these values. So let&amp;#039;s play the same game, and advertise for my blog too: &amp;quot;How clickability manipulated the analysts&amp;quot;: &lt;a href=&quot;http://tristanrenaud.jahia.com/how-clickability-manipulated-the-analysts&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://tristanrenaud.jahia.com/how-clickability-m...&lt;/a&gt;    </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Jul 2009 08:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.cmswatch.com/Trends/1635-Clickability-White-Paper-Mess#IDComment26203797</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>