tonygreenstein
84p40 comments posted · 5 followers · following 0
8 years ago @ Information Clearing H... - ‘NY Times&... · 2 replies · 0 points
Your gutter anti-Semitism is of service only to Zionism. Without anti-Semitism there would have been no Zionism. Anti-semitism pushed Jews to Palestine and the Palestinians suffered.
You need to stick your head in a plastic bag and try thinking. Yes I know it's impossible but you've had long enough to learn.
9 years ago @ Information Clearing H... - Russia Do... · 1 reply · 0 points
9 years ago @ Jewish Daily Forward - Embracing Boycott and ... · 1 reply · +7 points
9 years ago @ Jewish Daily Forward - Embracing Boycott and ... · 1 reply · +10 points
I think you'll find it was the Palestinian people who kicked off the Intifada. Might have something to do with living under Occupation. You should try it for a few decades and then see if you achieve any enlightenment.
Punting in the English dictionary is handling a canoe. I'm not aware he did though I am aware that people lied as to why Camp David didn't succeed. Apartheid states never give up their power voluntarily.
9 years ago @ Jewish Daily Forward - Embracing Boycott and ... · 0 replies · +9 points
That is incidentally one of the main problems about Israel. Unlike most democratic states, citizenship and nationality are not co-terminous. It is not a state of its citizens but a Jewish state. But in the passport citizenship (Israhut) is translated into the English as nationality. Zionism even lies in its official documents to deceive gullible non-Jews and it would seem ignorant Zionsits too.
No not difficult but I suspect it is for you Genelevit!
9 years ago @ Jewish Daily Forward - Embracing Boycott and ... · 1 reply · +9 points
The conflicts in Syria and Yemen have nothing to do with colonialism and Arabisation and a lot to do with Saudi and Gulf attempts to achieve a pax Americana. Yes the USA has blessed the bombing by the Saudis of Yemen.
Britain didn't 'give' the eastern part of Palestine to anyone. It wasn't Palestine and it wasn't Britain's to give. Britain happened to be the colonial power and what became Transjordan was part of the Palestine Mandate. It had never been considered a part of Palestine anymore than it was part of Syria. But yes the conquest or handing over of Jordan to the Saudis would of course have been more legitimate than Zionism. The Saudis, despite the West having put them in power in Arabia, were from the region unlike the European settlers that Zionism brought
9 years ago @ Jewish Daily Forward - Embracing Boycott and ... · 0 replies · +11 points
Nope. Anti-semites and racists, be it Farrakhan, Hagee or yourself, are not welcome in JVP. I can't speak for the Zionist J-Street but I suspect that since you are a meshuganah Zionist of the fascist type yourself all those to your left are communists.
In fact since Farrakhan is a Black separatist and Zionism is a form of Jewish separatism you should make your peace!
9 years ago @ Jewish Daily Forward - Embracing Boycott and ... · 3 replies · +12 points
You remind me of those idiots who measured the size of heads and then extrapolated from that to determine the size of someone's brain and hence their place on the racial spectrum. Craniology, I believe, was the 'science'.
Britain had the largest colonial empire, covering 1/4 of the world's surface, not including the informal empire. By your 'logical' stupidity it was India that was colonising Britain, not the other way around!
The Arab states aren't colonising, i.e. occupying and exploiting the land and labour of Israel or other states. Israel is doing all those things.
I hope I've simplified matters sufficient for even HardRocker to comprehend?
9 years ago @ Jewish Daily Forward - Embracing Boycott and ... · 1 reply · +10 points
There was little demand for separate voting for Muslim and Hindu and Congress had large numbers of Muslims in it, e.g. the Red G handi in the frontier regions of what is now Pakistan, but if less than 100,000 Brits were to conquer a hundred million Indians they needed to set the latter at each ot hers' t hroats.
Much the same happened in Palestine and of course Ireland. Ben Gurion never supported bi-nationalism. He supported a Jewish state and only supported partition as proposed by Peel in 1937 because once the Zionists had got a Jewish state they could then expand! Weizman too didn't support a bi-national state but a state that was Jewish, in his words, as England was English.
Stop trying to rewrite history. I know its a Zionist forte but in your case you are particularly bad ad it.
9 years ago @ Jewish Daily Forward - Embracing Boycott and ... · 3 replies · +6 points