<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/634880</link>
		<description>Comments by Tony</description>
<item>
<title>RouterJockey : Using Discontiguous Wildcard Masks in ACLs</title>
<link>http://routerjockey.com/2010/05/19/using-discontiguous-wildcard-masks-in-acls/#IDComment679302086</link>
<description>Thank you for that. This stuff is far easier when you&amp;#039;re working on paper vs trying to do it in a text editor + html formatting :)  I&amp;#039;ve updated the post to fix my XOR / AND maths. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jul 2013 18:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://routerjockey.com/2010/05/19/using-discontiguous-wildcard-masks-in-acls/#IDComment679302086</guid>
</item><item>
<title>RouterJockey : MDS Fibre Channel Switching Basics for Network Engineers</title>
<link>http://routerjockey.com/2011/12/23/mds-fiber-channel-switching-basics-for-network-engineers/#IDComment245673646</link>
<description>Looks like around June of 2009... &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps5989/prod_release_notes_list.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps5989/prod_r...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 20:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://routerjockey.com/2011/12/23/mds-fiber-channel-switching-basics-for-network-engineers/#IDComment245673646</guid>
</item><item>
<title>RouterJockey : Using Discontiguous Wildcard Masks in ACLs</title>
<link>http://routerjockey.com/2010/05/19/using-discontiguous-wildcard-masks-in-acls/#IDComment222986066</link>
<description>Not sure what I was thinking when I said 1 xor 0 = 1 xor 1 = 1... but that is not correct. Just proves that we&amp;#039;re all human, right?  BUT, when you&amp;#039;re setting up a discontiguous mask for 3 or more IP addresses, you need to forget XOR, and simply use your own logic. Is the bit significant or not... in the case of comparing 1, 0, 1.. the bit is NOT significant, thus it will be set to 1...  Maybe it would be best if I rewrote this article to better explain the logic. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 18:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://routerjockey.com/2010/05/19/using-discontiguous-wildcard-masks-in-acls/#IDComment222986066</guid>
</item><item>
<title>RouterJockey : SNMP can save your life</title>
<link>http://routerjockey.com/2011/09/28/snmp-can-save-your-life/#IDComment218724612</link>
<description>No problem Keith, this was from a Linux server, but it could&amp;#039;ve just as easily been from a Mac, or a Windows desktop running Cygwin. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 8 Nov 2011 15:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://routerjockey.com/2011/09/28/snmp-can-save-your-life/#IDComment218724612</guid>
</item><item>
<title>RouterJockey : NEC and ProgrammableFlow Switching</title>
<link>http://routerjockey.com/2011/11/02/nec-and-programmableflow-switching/#IDComment218203905</link>
<description>My apologies, meeting so many great people that week has led to a bit of name jumble... Thank you so much for having us out, we certainly enjoyed learning more from everyone at NFD2. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Nov 2011 16:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://routerjockey.com/2011/11/02/nec-and-programmableflow-switching/#IDComment218203905</guid>
</item><item>
<title>RouterJockey : SNMP can save your life</title>
<link>http://routerjockey.com/2011/09/28/snmp-can-save-your-life/#IDComment215818134</link>
<description>Unfortunately I wasn&amp;#039;t able to find a way to do that... I ended up having to add some static routes in my network to get to the P2P address on the device I was attempting to fix. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 2 Nov 2011 14:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://routerjockey.com/2011/09/28/snmp-can-save-your-life/#IDComment215818134</guid>
</item><item>
<title>RouterJockey : Using Discontiguous Wildcard Masks in ACLs</title>
<link>http://routerjockey.com/2010/05/19/using-discontiguous-wildcard-masks-in-acls/#IDComment214805884</link>
<description>The problem is that when you&amp;#039;re dealing with multiple values, you can&amp;#039;t treat it as a true XOR.. as a true XOR is between 2 values and the order of operations would affect the output. (101=1 110=0, if that makes sense)  In this case, you&amp;#039;re looking at a significant, or don&amp;#039;t care bit. Thus, if you have 101, your bit has to bet set to 1, because you don&amp;#039;t care about this value. It changes between the 3 IPs you&amp;#039;re checking against.   Does that make sense? </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://routerjockey.com/2010/05/19/using-discontiguous-wildcard-masks-in-acls/#IDComment214805884</guid>
</item><item>
<title>RouterJockey : Nexus 7000 vPC Features</title>
<link>http://routerjockey.com/2011/08/19/nexus-7000-vpc-features/#IDComment197057505</link>
<description>Not that I noticed...  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 23:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://routerjockey.com/2011/08/19/nexus-7000-vpc-features/#IDComment197057505</guid>
</item><item>
<title>RouterJockey : Best Practices and Securing Cisco IOS</title>
<link>http://routerjockey.com/2011/09/06/best-practices-and-securing-cisco-ios/#IDComment191608614</link>
<description>You&amp;#039;re absolutely correct, not sure how that made it in there, but I&amp;#039;ve updated the post now. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 Sep 2011 20:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://routerjockey.com/2011/09/06/best-practices-and-securing-cisco-ios/#IDComment191608614</guid>
</item><item>
<title>RouterJockey : Nexus 7000 vPC Features</title>
<link>http://routerjockey.com/2011/08/19/nexus-7000-vpc-features/#IDComment191468940</link>
<description>Exactly why I posted this article.... :) </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 9 Sep 2011 12:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://routerjockey.com/2011/08/19/nexus-7000-vpc-features/#IDComment191468940</guid>
</item><item>
<title>RouterJockey : Using Regular Expressions on Cisco IOS</title>
<link>http://routerjockey.com/2010/05/16/using-regular-expressions-on-cisco-ios/#IDComment187853697</link>
<description>LOL, and there you go... You ask, and luckily my readers shall help join in!!! Thank you Nathan! </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 22:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://routerjockey.com/2010/05/16/using-regular-expressions-on-cisco-ios/#IDComment187853697</guid>
</item><item>
<title>RouterJockey : Using Regular Expressions on Cisco IOS</title>
<link>http://routerjockey.com/2010/05/16/using-regular-expressions-on-cisco-ios/#IDComment186446567</link>
<description>Unless you write a full blown TCL script, I don&amp;#039;t think there is going to be a way to do this within EEM. I&amp;#039;m not up to speed on TCL programming as of yet, so unfortunately I&amp;#039;m not sure where to point you for additional information. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 12:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://routerjockey.com/2010/05/16/using-regular-expressions-on-cisco-ios/#IDComment186446567</guid>
</item><item>
<title>RouterJockey : Using Regular Expressions on Cisco IOS</title>
<link>http://routerjockey.com/2010/05/16/using-regular-expressions-on-cisco-ios/#IDComment186119517</link>
<description>It really depends on what exactly you&amp;#039;re trying to do, and if there is a way to insert regex in that function. If you can give me more detail about what you&amp;#039;re trying to accomplish, I&amp;#039;d be more than happy to try and help you out. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 12:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://routerjockey.com/2010/05/16/using-regular-expressions-on-cisco-ios/#IDComment186119517</guid>
</item><item>
<title>RouterJockey : My Toolbag</title>
<link>http://routerjockey.com/2011/06/17/my-toolbag/#IDComment185963062</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;ve recently bought a new Label maker... Its a cheaper model, but does a pretty good job making banner, and cable labels. Its a Brady BMP21.. ~$120 online </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 00:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://routerjockey.com/2011/06/17/my-toolbag/#IDComment185963062</guid>
</item><item>
<title>RouterJockey : Cisco Live 2011</title>
<link>http://routerjockey.com/2011/07/22/cisco-live-2011/#IDComment176327308</link>
<description>LOL  -- the feeling is very much reciprocated on my end. You guys were awesome!  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 18:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://routerjockey.com/2011/07/22/cisco-live-2011/#IDComment176327308</guid>
</item><item>
<title>RouterJockey : Cisco Live 2011</title>
<link>http://routerjockey.com/2011/07/22/cisco-live-2011/#IDComment176288817</link>
<description>Yeah... My birthday was a complete waste... I left the hotel at 5am, didn&amp;#039;t get hom until after 7pm... We brought our bags in, had dinner, and I went to bed.. LOL  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 16:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://routerjockey.com/2011/07/22/cisco-live-2011/#IDComment176288817</guid>
</item><item>
<title>RouterJockey : My Toolbag</title>
<link>http://routerjockey.com/2011/06/17/my-toolbag/#IDComment163627351</link>
<description>Nope.. too salty for me.. I&amp;#039;d love to get a new Fluke CableIQ and maybe a Fiber QuickMap, or even a OptiFiber, but they&amp;#039;re just too much $$ for me to justify... </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 19:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://routerjockey.com/2011/06/17/my-toolbag/#IDComment163627351</guid>
</item><item>
<title>RouterJockey : My Toolbag</title>
<link>http://routerjockey.com/2011/06/17/my-toolbag/#IDComment163626774</link>
<description>haha -- I had a nice butt set too, it was one of those little buttie rangers (made my JDSU) very compact, had lots of nice features on it...  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 19:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://routerjockey.com/2011/06/17/my-toolbag/#IDComment163626774</guid>
</item><item>
<title>RouterJockey : Nexus Virtual Port Channel (vPC)</title>
<link>http://routerjockey.com/2011/02/01/nexus-virtual-port-channel-vpc/#IDComment142169553</link>
<description>You can most certainly use 1-Gig Copper for your peer keep-alive.. that&amp;#039;s actually how I&amp;#039;m running in production right now. Your peer-links most definitely need to be 10g though.. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 11:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://routerjockey.com/2011/02/01/nexus-virtual-port-channel-vpc/#IDComment142169553</guid>
</item><item>
<title>RouterJockey : Cisco VOIP Basics - Installing Cisco Call Manager Express</title>
<link>http://routerjockey.com/2009/08/24/cisco-voip-basics-installing-cisco-call-manager-express/#IDComment140874626</link>
<description>Can you be more specific?  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 8 Apr 2011 01:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://routerjockey.com/2009/08/24/cisco-voip-basics-installing-cisco-call-manager-express/#IDComment140874626</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>