Jason Pitzl-Waters
80p549 comments posted · 3 followers · following 0
12 years ago @ The Wild Hunt - The Wild Hunt Joins Pa... · 1 reply · +2 points
12 years ago @ The Wild Hunt - The Wild Hunt Joins Pa... · 0 replies · +3 points
12 years ago @ The Wild Hunt - The Wild Hunt Joins Pa... · 0 replies · +4 points
12 years ago @ The Wild Hunt - The Wild Hunt Joins Pa... · 0 replies · +3 points
12 years ago @ The Wild Hunt - The Wild Hunt Joins Pa... · 1 reply · +4 points
12 years ago @ The Wild Hunt - The Wild Hunt Joins Pa... · 1 reply · +7 points
12 years ago @ The Wild Hunt - The Wild Hunt Joins Pa... · 0 replies · +2 points
12 years ago @ The Wild Hunt - Esoteric Publishers, C... · 1 reply · +3 points
Point of order: you do know that getting banned from an Internet forum isn't "censorship," right? You can indeed be against censorship while booting people off an Internet forum you control. Just as you can be against censorship and call the cops on someone shouting at you on your yard.
12 years ago @ The Wild Hunt - Esoteric Publishers, C... · 3 replies · +5 points
Well, I have no professional or personal relationship with Scarlet Imprint, I don't publish esoteric books, not looking to get published in any book on magic(k)al practice, and I'm not really the biggest Crowley fan. So it would be hard, I think, to categorize me as some sycophantic follower of random proclamations made on the Internet by SI.
So, when I tell you that Southgate is indeed a crypto-fascist and any serious reading of his history, words, and associations would bear that out, would you take it seriously? As for him being a "dangerous, bigoted, wolf in sheep's clothing," well if you think subscribing to beliefs straight out of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion (“vampiric parasites intent on carving up the world’s resources in an attempt to create a single, global market”) or racial separatism ("a coffee-coloured mush of uniform humanity"), or anti-feminism, or anti-abortion, or his "criticism" of fascism that really isn't criticism at all (he mostly thinks their tactics were bad) aren't well, "dangerous" or "bigoted," I'm not sure what to tell you. As for entryism, it is something he admits to, so its hardly a conspiracy against him.
Now, if you think a publishing company run by someone with his views is something you want to support, there's nobody stopping you. But as I said, to pretend that we live in apolitical vacuums where his views won't ultimately taint the work of authors who participate in his ventures is naive at best. An "apolitical" book that supports a very political man's company and goals isn't "apolitical" at all.
12 years ago @ The Wild Hunt - Esoteric Publishers, C... · 3 replies · +9 points