<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/1440396</link>
		<description>Comments by themotif</description>
<item>
<title>Big Journalism : Correction Request: Media Matters For America Incorrectly Labels Two Full Video Excerpts as &#039;Heavily</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/retracto/2010/07/21/correction-request-media-matters-for-america-incorrectly-labels-two-full-video-excerpts-as-heavily-edited/#IDComment87974801</link>
<description>Sigh. Are we still discussing this nonstory?   </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 00:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/retracto/2010/07/21/correction-request-media-matters-for-america-incorrectly-labels-two-full-video-excerpts-as-heavily-edited/#IDComment87974801</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Top Ten Most Left-Biased American Journalists - #3: JournoList&#039;s Own Paul Krugman, &lt;i&gt;The New York T</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/wthuston/2010/07/20/top-ten-most-left-biased-american-journalists-3-journolists-own-paul-krugman-the-new-york-times/#IDComment87969877</link>
<description>Oh, and he regularly updates a New York Times online blog titled, &amp;quot;Conscience of a Liberal.&amp;quot; You can criminalize him as a &amp;quot;hard left hack,&amp;quot; but that doesn&amp;#039;t change the fact that this entry&amp;#039;s author&amp;#039;s claims are logically fallible. Krugman&amp;#039;s paid to be biased &amp;mdash; his profession is leftist economic commentary, and whether he has distorted factual evidence in his political favor is solely a subjective judgment. Therefore, I continue to focus on indisputable truth: He&amp;#039;s an opinionmaker and obviously held to standards removed from the journalistic realm. Objectivity is a nonissue when you&amp;#039;re business is two cents. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 23:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/wthuston/2010/07/20/top-ten-most-left-biased-american-journalists-3-journolists-own-paul-krugman-the-new-york-times/#IDComment87969877</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Top Ten Most Left-Biased American Journalists - #3: JournoList&#039;s Own Paul Krugman, &lt;i&gt;The New York T</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/wthuston/2010/07/20/top-ten-most-left-biased-american-journalists-3-journolists-own-paul-krugman-the-new-york-times/#IDComment87954937</link>
<description>No problem.   &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/13/AR2009021302514.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/arti...&lt;/a&gt;  Do your own research. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 21:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/wthuston/2010/07/20/top-ten-most-left-biased-american-journalists-3-journolists-own-paul-krugman-the-new-york-times/#IDComment87954937</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Top Ten Most Left-Biased American Journalists - #3: JournoList&#039;s Own Paul Krugman, &lt;i&gt;The New York T</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/wthuston/2010/07/20/top-ten-most-left-biased-american-journalists-3-journolists-own-paul-krugman-the-new-york-times/#IDComment87808675</link>
<description>Conservative pundits are equally prone to twisting factual evidence in their favor. You can denounce Krugman, but you can&amp;#039;t deny that your site isn&amp;#039;t objectively credible.  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 03:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/wthuston/2010/07/20/top-ten-most-left-biased-american-journalists-3-journolists-own-paul-krugman-the-new-york-times/#IDComment87808675</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Top Ten Most Left-Biased American Journalists - #3: JournoList&#039;s Own Paul Krugman, &lt;i&gt;The New York T</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/wthuston/2010/07/20/top-ten-most-left-biased-american-journalists-3-journolists-own-paul-krugman-the-new-york-times/#IDComment87760416</link>
<description>Allow me to reiterate a previous comment: Krugman writes an opinion column, which means claims of &amp;quot;bias&amp;quot; are invalid. If you plan to use this laughable criteria, perhaps your next blog entry should be titled, &amp;quot;Top Ten Most Right-Biased American Journalists - #1: George Will, The Washington Post.&amp;quot; </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 22:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/wthuston/2010/07/20/top-ten-most-left-biased-american-journalists-3-journolists-own-paul-krugman-the-new-york-times/#IDComment87760416</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism :  JournoList: ...Yes, But the Reporters at Pravda Weren&#039;t Such Insufferable Assholes</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/abreitbart/2010/07/20/journolist-yes-but-the-reporters-at-pravda-werent-such-insufferable-assholes/#IDComment87754970</link>
<description>This is a ludicrous nonstory. In concise summary, The Daily Caller alleges that openly liberal commentators attempted to influence the agenda-setting of straight news reporters. This commonplace occurrence is not an obscene rarity.  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 22:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/abreitbart/2010/07/20/journolist-yes-but-the-reporters-at-pravda-werent-such-insufferable-assholes/#IDComment87754970</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>