If you'll take note, I never stated there is a god in my responses. I made reference to your fallacious reasoning to draw doubt upon your specific argument, not refute it. The proof of God is intangible, so I will not attempt to prove God's existence.

"The jesus story is nothing more than the creation of the Council of Nissah, in 325 AD."

The story existed before the Catholic Church came into existence. Christianity was originally a "grassroots" religion. Furthermore, Catholicism derives from the Bible. It is not solely based upon it.

"But if all proof points to evolution, and the world is not really thousands of years old..."

Go read the TalkOrigins FAQ. Biblical creationism and evolution are not incompatible.

"What about the gaping holes in the bible. There is talk of the "messiah" in the new testament, yet there is nothing prior in the old testament."

Except for a lot of prophecies that foretell his coming.

"In fact, if you view the OT, there is the story of I believe Joshua who had 12 brothers, who was betrayed by his brother Judah, and he went on to become the king of kings... sounds awfully familiar does it not? "

Now you're just inventing things.

"Both stories are just tales made up to describe the 12 constelations... and their relation to the Sun... not the son."

Correlation does not make causation. Do you have substantive proof of this assertion?

"Bogus, made up material that billions of people waste their lives on... instead of appreciating the true heaven. The world we have today, that we can make a better place for ourselves, and others."

Human nature will always prevent utopia.

I'm sorry for using the proper terminology. I didn't realize you have no educational background in logic, which is unusual for someone claiming logic. The particular form of ad hominem that I refer to is an attack of the person based on the presumption of predisposition. I would normally explain it, but I would rather leave you to continue your humorous projection.

Says the person committing a veiled ad hominem circumstantial fallacy.

Indeed.

Irrational fear often trumps reasonable solutions when the topic comes to guns.

No, not really.

Between the atomic bomb and pesticides, humans already have full dominion over all other creatures on this planet. No other creature comes anywhere near humans on such a measure. We are also the only creature capable of understanding your narrow-minded philosophy.

I'd use it for one of those caption images... "Osama Bin Laden - the man Allah couldn't protect."

You have one hell of a case of hindsight bias.

Or something about ridiculously complex tax laws and other regulations. I find your "stick" method to be humorous.