<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/1180362</link>
		<description>Comments by strathmeyer</description>
<item>
<title>http://www.willows-journal.com/ : Corning truancy arrest mimicks Orland case | corning, trua - Local News - Willows Journal</title>
<link>http://www.willows-journal.com/articles/corning-4763-truancy-forgery.html#IDComment77414035</link>
<description>LibertyJane, the fact that you think a negligent parent would somehow be better homeschooling their children says a lot about homeschoolers. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 02:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.willows-journal.com/articles/corning-4763-truancy-forgery.html#IDComment77414035</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : What the MSM Didn&#039;t Tell You About Holder and the Police Chiefs</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/jdunetz/2010/05/27/what-the-msm-didnt-tell-you-about-holder-and-the-police-chiefs/#IDComment77407315</link>
<description>&amp;quot;Somebody  ought to explain to Chief Myers,that if someone comes into the country illegally, that qualifies them as a criminal alien. And someone has to explain to the media, that giving half the story is just as biased as lying.&amp;quot; Wow, what on earth does that have to do with the first half of the article? Does this &amp;quot;journalist&amp;quot; really not understand what a &amp;quot;non sequitor&amp;quot; is? How biased does &amp;quot;journalism&amp;quot; have to be before we call it yellow? This article pretty much displays the incoherent thinking of the people who support these absurd laws, and is indistinguishable from someone mocking their opinion by acting stupid. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 01:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/jdunetz/2010/05/27/what-the-msm-didnt-tell-you-about-holder-and-the-police-chiefs/#IDComment77407315</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>