<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/1468826</link>
		<description>Comments by stone2016</description>
<item>
<title>CSMonitor: USA : Harry Reid\&#039;s biggest gaffes - CSMonitor.com</title>
<link>https://webin.csmonitor.com/content/view/full/327363#IDComment100422211</link>
<description>The BP fund is a slush fund.  A Senator does not create jobs, only creates an environment that encourages or disincentivizes job creation by business.  How are those gaffes? </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 20:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>https://webin.csmonitor.com/content/view/full/327363#IDComment100422211</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Cleavage Comes to Sesame Street</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/cleavage-comes-to-sesame-street/#IDComment100399878</link>
<description>Another reason my kids don&amp;#039;t watch this show. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 18:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/cleavage-comes-to-sesame-street/#IDComment100399878</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Genius Envy? MSNBC Host Claims &#039;I Could EASILY Out-Draw Glenn Beck&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/genius-envy-msnbc-host-claims-i-could-easily-out-draw-glenn-beck/#IDComment96381514</link>
<description>Prove it! </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 1 Sep 2010 13:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/genius-envy-msnbc-host-claims-i-could-easily-out-draw-glenn-beck/#IDComment96381514</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Peace : Black and White</title>
<link>http://bigpeace.com/mweisman/2010/08/19/black-and-white/#IDComment94246959</link>
<description>&amp;quot;Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.&amp;quot;  Thought I would quote it for you to make it easier for you, just to show I&amp;#039;m moderate and tolerant. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 22:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigpeace.com/mweisman/2010/08/19/black-and-white/#IDComment94246959</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Peace : Black and White</title>
<link>http://bigpeace.com/mweisman/2010/08/19/black-and-white/#IDComment94246774</link>
<description>which one?  Please enlighten the Glenn Beck listeners. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 22:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigpeace.com/mweisman/2010/08/19/black-and-white/#IDComment94246774</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Peace : Black and White</title>
<link>http://bigpeace.com/mweisman/2010/08/19/black-and-white/#IDComment94246444</link>
<description>I try not to miss Glenn.  No. 1 on my DVR list.  Which means I am open minded to facts and real arguements, and reject baseless statements and insults.  But you are right about the drivel...  &amp;quot;The U.S. must acknowledge the harm they have done to Muslims before terrorism can end.&amp;quot;     &amp;quot;The issue of terrorism is a very complex question.&amp;rdquo;  &amp;ldquo;United States policies were an accessory to the crime that happened [on 9/11] &amp;hellip; Because we have been accessory to a lot of innocent [Muslim] lives dying in the world.&amp;rdquo;   Drivel, Drivel, Drivel.  No one has yet explained why that is the only place in New York City this mosque can be built.  No on has yet explained the massive outcry by muslims in the area for this mosque.  And remember, this is a moderate, tolerant imam who believes in building bridges, so if he is moderate and tolerant, he should explain the absolute necessity for it to be built right there.  Oh, we know why  it&amp;#039;s necessary to be right there, victory mosque. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 22:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigpeace.com/mweisman/2010/08/19/black-and-white/#IDComment94246444</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Peace : Black and White</title>
<link>http://bigpeace.com/mweisman/2010/08/19/black-and-white/#IDComment94240442</link>
<description>Good response.  The only way it can be a victory mosque is if they tell us it&amp;#039;s a victory mosque.  Is that why we have to believe the imam behind it is moderate, because he tells us he is?  Same mistake Europe made with Hitler.  Go do a little reading and catch up with the rest of the class before you make a furthur fool of yourself.   2 + 2 = 4 NOT 5 </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 21:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigpeace.com/mweisman/2010/08/19/black-and-white/#IDComment94240442</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Peace : Black and White</title>
<link>http://bigpeace.com/mweisman/2010/08/19/black-and-white/#IDComment94238564</link>
<description>Let&amp;#039;s try sticking to the point.  First Amendment is not the question.  A mosque victory flag at ground zero where extremist muslims murder 3000 Americans is the issue.  Justify a tolerant, moderate, bridge builder throwing salt on the wounds.  It doesn&amp;#039;t even matter if it really is an insult.  The fact that some are insulted and the unwillingness of this imam to reconsider, proves what the intent of the mosque is.  It is a victory mosque.  Now that we know the truth, lets debate whether or not we should allow a victory mosque to be built.  Should the Germans build a statue of Hitler on Auswitch?  Whether the analogy is appropriate or accurate, that is how the loved ones of the survivors feel.  And tolerant muslims should understand. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 21:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigpeace.com/mweisman/2010/08/19/black-and-white/#IDComment94238564</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Aerosmith&#039;s Steven Tyler Bumped Off Stage by Bandmate</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/aerosmiths-steven-tyler-bumped-off-stage-by-bandmate/#IDComment94172651</link>
<description>Nothing like a good old publicity stunt to get your name out there.  Could not have been more obvious. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 14:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/aerosmiths-steven-tyler-bumped-off-stage-by-bandmate/#IDComment94172651</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : SEIU Posts AZ Propaganda Video Linking GOP With Fascists</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/seiu-posts-az-propaganda-video-linking-gop-with-fascists/#IDComment90644297</link>
<description>Since the East/West Germany wall was meant to keep East Germans in...   I guess when we turn into the communist nation SEIU desires, they would use the border fence to keep people in the USA...so why are they against it?  It would be nice if these people could be a little consistent.  But then, that would require thought and principles.   </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 3 Aug 2010 18:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/seiu-posts-az-propaganda-video-linking-gop-with-fascists/#IDComment90644297</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : SEIU Posts AZ Propaganda Video Linking GOP With Fascists</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/seiu-posts-az-propaganda-video-linking-gop-with-fascists/#IDComment90643402</link>
<description>That was really the best they could do?  You mean we don&amp;#039;t have to be a communist country?  Seems odd to reference communist and DEMOCRAT actions as evil, since these are democrat/communists. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 3 Aug 2010 18:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/seiu-posts-az-propaganda-video-linking-gop-with-fascists/#IDComment90643402</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Olbermann Attacks Breitbart and Fox Over Sherrod Story</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/olbermann-attacks-breitbart-and-fox-over-sherrod-story/#IDComment88238927</link>
<description>You have me on the facts.  Since this originated on Fox News and Glenn Beck, you have won the arguement.  I know there is no evidence of it, but you say it did, so it must have.  Thank you for taking the time to inform this unwashed, inbred, microcephalic, member of the masses.  And thank you for elevating the discourse on this site.  I&amp;#039;m really tired of all those that just ignore the facts and call names, too. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 15:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/olbermann-attacks-breitbart-and-fox-over-sherrod-story/#IDComment88238927</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Sherrod: Breitbart is a Racist</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/sherrod-breitbart-is-a-racist/#IDComment88236785</link>
<description>Actually, bigots all over the world make a killing...usually by killing.  I still don&amp;#039;t understand how a bigotted, racist, (lets throw all insults in) homophobe, child starving, simple minded, gun toting, God fearing, (and the most important insult) White blogger can have this kind of effect on the Administration.  I guess it just shows that whitey is still in power.    Even though the NAACP had the full tape and everyone knows A.B. is a racist,  A.B. is so powerful he used his white jedi mind powers to trick the NAACP into condemning this poor innocent woman.  Even though the Administration is the one who ordered the firing of this woman, it was only because the all-powerful racist biggot forced them to do it.  Yep, that makes sense. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 14:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/sherrod-breitbart-is-a-racist/#IDComment88236785</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Sherrod: Breitbart is a Racist</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/sherrod-breitbart-is-a-racist/#IDComment88234409</link>
<description>White people now have to prove to Sherrod that they&amp;#039;re not racists?  How?  By laughing and applauding when a black woman tells a story about being racists towards a white man?  Who are the people that see the world this way?  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 14:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/sherrod-breitbart-is-a-racist/#IDComment88234409</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Olbermann Attacks Breitbart and Fox Over Sherrod Story</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/olbermann-attacks-breitbart-and-fox-over-sherrod-story/#IDComment88123463</link>
<description>Oh...it now makes sense.  Beck calls the White House and threatens to call the woman a racist.  The White House (who is terrified of Glenn Beck&amp;#039;s attacks) then fires her.  Beck then rubs his hands and gives a deep sinister laugh that lasts about 20 minutes.  How did we miss that one?  Sort of like when the Tea Party called the media and said they would call the congressmen the N-word after health care was passed.  The media ran the story and the Tea Party backtracked and didn&amp;#039;t actually use the N-word. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 22:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/olbermann-attacks-breitbart-and-fox-over-sherrod-story/#IDComment88123463</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Olbermann Attacks Breitbart and Fox Over Sherrod Story</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/olbermann-attacks-breitbart-and-fox-over-sherrod-story/#IDComment88065377</link>
<description>I think he believes the faster he talks the less facts matter.  HOW did Fox News assassinate this woman?  Fox News didn&amp;#039;t report this stuff until AFTER she was fired. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 15:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/olbermann-attacks-breitbart-and-fox-over-sherrod-story/#IDComment88065377</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Worlds Collide:  Breitbart Meets Boehlert on National Television</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/worlds-collide-breitbart-meets-boehlert-on-national-television/#IDComment88064482</link>
<description>I love the &amp;quot;I believe words over video evidence&amp;quot; comment.  That descibes Media Matters exactly.  If it fits our template, we will push it, no matter the facts or evidence to the contrary. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/worlds-collide-breitbart-meets-boehlert-on-national-television/#IDComment88064482</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Worlds Collide:  Breitbart Meets Boehlert on National Television</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/worlds-collide-breitbart-meets-boehlert-on-national-television/#IDComment88063840</link>
<description>If Sherrod is not a racist, why does she have to point out that a white guy was lined up to buy the black family&amp;#039;s land.  Does it matter that he&amp;#039;s white?  Would it be ok if it were a black guy putting an offer on the land?    It is truely sad that if a person complained about a black guy buying out a white family, that would be racists, but no one bats an eye at a government employee complaining about a white guy buying out a black family. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/worlds-collide-breitbart-meets-boehlert-on-national-television/#IDComment88063840</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>