gdp's Comments

Big Journalism : UI: Think Green

Sun, 4 Mar 2012 20:46:23 +0000

Fascism - A system of government marked by centralization of authority under a dictator, stringent socioeconomic controls, suppression of the opposition through terror and censorship, and typically a policy of belligerent nationalism and racism. Communism - A theoretical economic system characterized by the collective ownership of property and by the organization of labor for the common advantage of all members. Fascism is a form of government, Communism is an economic system. A truly Communist society is virtually impossible to achieve because there will always be an element of that society that wants more than their share or feel that they should be in control. That is why communism, in practice, has resulted authoritarian governments which have much in common with a fascist state.

Big Journalism : UI: Think Green

Sun, 4 Mar 2012 20:43:26 +0000

LOL

Big Journalism : UI: Think Green

Sat, 3 Mar 2012 22:35:34 +0000

Ah but Brooklin is not a correct what is your response to that.

Big Journalism : UI: Think Green

Sat, 3 Mar 2012 19:45:48 +0000

See if you said that originally you would have answered mu question. However as to your link I see no change from last year, 3 years ago, 5 years ago. Iraq has always been like that since the war started.

Big Journalism : UI: Think Green

Sat, 3 Mar 2012 19:36:25 +0000

I would too if I had to deal with people like you.

Big Journalism : UI: Think Green

Sat, 3 Mar 2012 19:27:12 +0000

There was also a recession when Obama took office. Also if you looked at the link you would see that average income was falling until about 2006. Hint a certain party won elections that year. So the best quality of life was in 2007 under Bush and according to you we should judge the economy on quality of life, which fell from 2000 to 2007.

Big Journalism : UI: Think Green

Sat, 3 Mar 2012 19:23:31 +0000

Alright I'll ask again has Iraq changed since we left. No need to quantify your answer a simple yes or no will do.

Big Journalism : UI: Think Green

Sat, 3 Mar 2012 19:21:52 +0000

I gave you links and examples too why is it that only yours count and mine are lies? I also didn't ignore them I responded to each accordingly.

Big Journalism : UI: Think Green

Sat, 3 Mar 2012 19:15:40 +0000

So no source on thoses figures?

Big Journalism : UI: Think Green

Sat, 3 Mar 2012 19:14:48 +0000

See here we go again. I was a valedictorian, varsity athlete and have a job, but still continue to throw out insults it makes you seem level headed and respectful.

Big Journalism : UI: Think Green

Sat, 3 Mar 2012 19:11:01 +0000

No he is a smart man. He has a PhD from MIT, but I'm sure you have that too right?

Big Journalism : UI: Think Green

Sat, 3 Mar 2012 19:08:45 +0000

You might want to tell George Bush that because median income went down when he was in office. http://www.tax.com/taxcom/taxblog.nsf/Permalink/C... However I judge the economy the way economist judge it. You seem to judge it on how people perceive it. Standards of living improved before the war under FDR. What about that. Are you going to say that standards didn't improve from Hoover to FDR?

Big Journalism : UI: Think Green

Sat, 3 Mar 2012 19:02:30 +0000

Dodging the question again? Also just because you say something that does not make it true

Big Journalism : UI: Think Green

Sat, 3 Mar 2012 19:01:39 +0000

So no specific example then. Quick question when have you answer me questions with a simple yes or no. Also I don't recall a specific example ever given. Just because you say something that does not make it true.

Big Journalism : UI: Think Green

Sat, 3 Mar 2012 18:58:01 +0000

So defecting the question and refusing to give a yes or no.

Big Journalism : UI: Think Green

Sat, 3 Mar 2012 18:53:00 +0000

Yeah where are you getting these figures?

Big Journalism : UI: Think Green

Sat, 3 Mar 2012 18:51:26 +0000

Hahaha see you did call my mom a whore you just didn't use the word. Trying to go for plausible deniability?

Big Journalism : UI: Think Green

Sat, 3 Mar 2012 18:50:20 +0000

See you just can't get past the personal can you?

Big Journalism : UI: Think Green

Sat, 3 Mar 2012 18:25:09 +0000

You just contradicted yourself. In you previous article it said "Only 45.4% of Americans had jobs in 2010". In this new article it stated " The percentage of the working-age population..now has been in the 58% range for months". So which is it 45% or 58% because if I go with your first statement the workforce has grown 13%. If I go with the second you admit you lied about the first, just to prove a talking point.

Big Journalism : UI: Think Green

Sat, 3 Mar 2012 18:18:44 +0000

Okay don't go after the point go after me. It just shows how strong your argument is.