<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/951367</link>
		<description>Comments by srvman</description>
<item>
<title>The Loop : Aperture the backbone of the Best of Photojournalism awards</title>
<link>http://www.loopinsight.com/2010/03/26/aperture-the-backbone-of-the-best-of-photojournalism-awards/#IDComment65285219</link>
<description>I start by saying &amp;quot;I love Aperture&amp;quot; despite some quirky things I do not even want to mention. I have been using it since v1.0 and my library is now over 100GB. And Aperture manages reasonably well. However, Aperture is a single user product, with no multi-user or collaborative capabilities to speak of. This is the Achilles heel of Apple. They have a lack in systems software experience which shows in the lack of support for storing your library on a fast server, and have master-&amp;gt;version locking to allow for access to the library from multiple workstations.  This article implies cooperative use, of a group of judges. Well they better be in one room using the system otherwise it would be pretty hard to collaborate and come to some meaningful conclusion.  Therefore I am taking some offense at this article as it paints a slant picture of reality.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Apr 2010 20:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.loopinsight.com/2010/03/26/aperture-the-backbone-of-the-best-of-photojournalism-awards/#IDComment65285219</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The Loop : Aperture the backbone of the Best of Photojournalism awards</title>
<link>http://www.loopinsight.com/2010/03/26/aperture-the-backbone-of-the-best-of-photojournalism-awards/#IDComment65247113</link>
<description>I start by saying &amp;quot;I love Aperture&amp;quot; despite some quirky things I do not even want to mention. I have been using it since v1.0 and my library is now over 100GB, and still decently manageable. However, this article implies to the casual reader that it is a multi-user system unless the committee of judges consisted of 1 person I do not see how you can run an effective rating system on it, without all being in the same room.  I believe Aperture&amp;#039;s biggest missing component is to be able to store the library on a fast server and lock at master-&amp;gt;version level. Here Apple again is showing its infancy in strong systems software, and I wish they would grow up in that area as well. They are miles ahead of anyone else in UI design, but good old fashion multi-user/access to stuff is a lonely child in Cupertino. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Apr 2010 18:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.loopinsight.com/2010/03/26/aperture-the-backbone-of-the-best-of-photojournalism-awards/#IDComment65247113</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>