<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/631364</link>
		<description>Comments by squishO90</description>
<item>
<title>The FAA Follies : Vindication</title>
<link>http://www.faafollies.com/?p=1432#IDComment31023817</link>
<description>It&amp;#039;s too bad that we couldn&amp;#039;t get a letter writing campaign, like we had with Balkey when she was administrator. A lot if us writing to her asking her to comment on the new deal you all just got. And maybe a few letters to the board of AIA. Maybe we could get some comment out of her. That would be a tasty little morsel I bet. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 15:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.faafollies.com/?p=1432#IDComment31023817</guid>
</item><item>
<title>The FAA Follies : You Don&#039;t Deserve This</title>
<link>http://www.faafollies.com/?p=1430#IDComment30705301</link>
<description>Anybody notice anything on staffing, like the restriction on filling positions (aka) sups  positions a la article 94 of the green book?  How about an MOU that adresses that subject. I seem to remember an MOU or something that mandated the FAA have a ceretain number of controllers on board. After all with out the proper staffing, it still gives the FAA the right to deny leave and work you  all more than 2 hours on position  etc </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 00:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.faafollies.com/?p=1430#IDComment30705301</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>