<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/1327197</link>
		<description>Comments by socalmike</description>
<item>
<title>Big Hollywood : What Shoulda Won? Best Picture Academy Award - 1995</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ccannon/2011/06/25/what-shoulda-won-best-picture-academy-award-1995/#IDComment993579855</link>
<description>I hoping to find Carolyn and respond to her Usual Suspect response. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 4 Sep 2015 18:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ccannon/2011/06/25/what-shoulda-won-best-picture-academy-award-1995/#IDComment993579855</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Friday Crib Sheet: Maddow vs Politifact; NPR Debuts New Ethics Book</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2012/02/24/friday-crib-sheet-maddow-vs-politifact-npr-debuts-new-ethics-book/#IDComment302524767</link>
<description>Thought it was funny.  Chink jokes are the best.  Were like me, yukking it over Charlie C&amp;#039;s #1 son?  good times... thumbs up! </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 05:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2012/02/24/friday-crib-sheet-maddow-vs-politifact-npr-debuts-new-ethics-book/#IDComment302524767</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Will Emily Crockett Repeat Her Lie About Andrew Breitbart Being &#039;Drunk&#039; at CPAC? &lt;span style=&quot;color:</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/jpollak/2012/02/15/will-emily-crockett-repeat-her-lie-about-andrew-breitbart-being-drunk-at-cpac/#IDComment297331988</link>
<description>Does Crocket still have that faux beard once sported back in those Miami days? </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 17:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/jpollak/2012/02/15/will-emily-crockett-repeat-her-lie-about-andrew-breitbart-being-drunk-at-cpac/#IDComment297331988</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : NBC&#039;s Chuck Todd Previews How Media Will Team With #Occupy to Hammer Obama&#039;s GOP Challengers</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/jjmnolte/2012/02/17/nbcs-chuck-todd-previews-how-media-will-team-with-occupy-to-hammer-obamas-gop-challengers/#IDComment297262665</link>
<description>With this message, Todd is telling Occupy they succeeded: --- was there a reason this line was used multiple times?  If Todd gave a different report saying they acted like thugs- that would be worth repeating.  He didn&amp;#039;t- so where&amp;#039;s the surprise.   </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 15:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/jjmnolte/2012/02/17/nbcs-chuck-todd-previews-how-media-will-team-with-occupy-to-hammer-obamas-gop-challengers/#IDComment297262665</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Controversial Pat Buchanan Forced Off of MSNBC By Van Jones, Media Matters</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2012/02/18/controversial-pat-buchanan-forced-off-of-msnbc-by-van-jones-media-matters/#IDComment297247458</link>
<description>That&amp;rsquo;s the difference between conservatives and progressives: --- while I&amp;#039;ve seen this to be case, what in blazes does the left getting rid of Pat B have to do with the first amendment.  If for whatever reason MSNBC cans him they&amp;#039;re a private company and they can do as they please.  If some BigJ writer goes off the rails and they get dumped, are their First Amendment rights violated?  I don&amp;#039;t understand the failure to see this distinction.  Seeing where CNN who got rid of Dobbs or now Pat B from MSNBC, they want a more seemless left slant- good for them and good for us; now we really have no reason to watch- unless not watching is violation of free speech if you don&amp;#039;t listen to someone. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 14:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2012/02/18/controversial-pat-buchanan-forced-off-of-msnbc-by-van-jones-media-matters/#IDComment297247458</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : MSNBC Never Should Have Hired Buchanan, Never Should Have Fired Buchanan</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/bshapiro/2012/02/18/msnbc-never-should-have-hired-buchanan-never-should-have-fired-buchanan/#IDComment297242005</link>
<description>Defending Pat B could be a cottage industry.  For me, whatever his comment there was always something in it to cause pause.  He is vastly more informed than many commentators, with things worthy of sharing and to keep in the back of the mind to re-examine.  As for this article, the author has not shown himself bettor informed than Pat B and the attacks are ancient and I find misleading.  The left shouts racist [or anti-semite as this article does] and it freezes the brain- why use it in this arena I do not know.  At worst Pat B may be the right&amp;#039;s crazy uncle, but hey that person is me in my family. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 14:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/bshapiro/2012/02/18/msnbc-never-should-have-hired-buchanan-never-should-have-fired-buchanan/#IDComment297242005</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Beck&#039;s Blaze Doubles Down On Palin Smear, Writer Scrubs &#039;Whore&#039; Tweet</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/jjmnolte/2012/02/10/becks-blaze-doubles-down-on-palin-smear-writer-scrubs-whore-tweet/#IDComment292423700</link>
<description>Thanks first hat.  Couldn&amp;#039;t agree more.  Look above at Nolte&amp;#039;s comment: &amp;quot;Where did I write or even come close to expressing the idea that &amp;quot;the blogger should be shut down&amp;quot;? That&amp;#039;s just a lie.&amp;quot;   That&amp;#039;s a hyper response.  He did something similar to a woman who complained over the endless skewering of the Maher, Stewart gang.  I was sick of it too.  To read everyday what dumba** things that group says is like reading &amp;#039;dog bites man.&amp;#039;  Who cares.  I get it they&amp;#039;re liberal.  Move on.  Look at the big picture.  I now read Big J once a week where I once read daily.  The comment section too often sounds like the Greek chorus with too much pent up feelings of payback.  I&amp;#039;m near 60 and I&amp;#039;ve spent my whole life listening to the left&amp;#039;s crapola- the big picture as you say is our country&amp;#039;s future. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/jjmnolte/2012/02/10/becks-blaze-doubles-down-on-palin-smear-writer-scrubs-whore-tweet/#IDComment292423700</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : The Media-Created Camelot</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/rfutrell/2012/02/12/the-media-created-camelot/#IDComment292370107</link>
<description>Curious to juxtapose cigars and sex.  Where&amp;#039;s Sigmund when you need him.  Also- if anyone can recall a recent book on the mythology and how Jackie coined it when she said he listened to Camelot all the time - she told it after he was assasinated.  Otherwise found this: The crime writer James Ellroy may have put it best in his typically hardboiled novel American Tabloid: &amp;ldquo;Jack Kennedy was the mythological front man for a particularly juicy slice of our history. He talked a slick line and wore a world-class haircut. He was Bill Clinton minus pervasive media scrutiny and a few rolls of flab. Jack got whacked at the optimum moment to assure his sainthood. Lies continue to swirl around his eternal flame . . . .&amp;rdquo;__ </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/rfutrell/2012/02/12/the-media-created-camelot/#IDComment292370107</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : &#039;Heavenly Creatures&#039; Blu-ray Review: Still Director Peter Jackson&#039;s Greatest Film</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2012/01/21/heavenly-creatures-blu-ray-review-still-director-peter-jacksons-greatest-film/#IDComment271036909</link>
<description>is still the greatest feat of his career- just like that Goldie Hawn vehicle was Stevie S&amp;#039;s best- how can people miss it??? </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 06:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2012/01/21/heavenly-creatures-blu-ray-review-still-director-peter-jacksons-greatest-film/#IDComment271036909</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : &#039;Heavenly Creatures&#039; Blu-ray Review: Still Director Peter Jackson&#039;s Greatest Film</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2012/01/21/heavenly-creatures-blu-ray-review-still-director-peter-jacksons-greatest-film/#IDComment271036784</link>
<description>it&amp;#039;s not very good- but Nolte&amp;#039;s taste has puzzled me for a while now </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 06:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2012/01/21/heavenly-creatures-blu-ray-review-still-director-peter-jacksons-greatest-film/#IDComment271036784</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Eric Boehlert&#039;s Attempt to Rewrite History of Edwards Scandal Highlights Media Matters&#039; Radical Agen</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/jpollak/2012/01/20/eric-boehlerts-attempt-to-rewrite-history-of-edwards-scandal-highlights-media-matters-radical-agenda/#IDComment270884777</link>
<description>I haven&amp;#039;t kept up with some of this- u say: &amp;quot;...infidelity while showing no interest in similar accusations about Barack Obama.&amp;quot;  What accusations of infidelity were leveled at Obama?  And that King guy that Gingrich ripped into- was there a follow up with Calista if they have an open marriage?  I mean whatever wife #2 says, isn&amp;#039;t that the logical follow-up?   </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 01:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/jpollak/2012/01/20/eric-boehlerts-attempt-to-rewrite-history-of-edwards-scandal-highlights-media-matters-radical-agenda/#IDComment270884777</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : The &lt;i&gt;LA Times&lt;/i&gt; Spews More Gas Than Truth Over Extraction</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/jbradley/2012/01/13/the-la-times-spews-more-gas-than-truth-over-extraction/#IDComment265174513</link>
<description>CSI did a fracking episode to // Erin B... see shark- jump- stopped watching [and i was a big fan]- this issue is global warming part 2- they lost in Congress- regs is next- if they lose this- the gloves will come off and this time around the Weatherman will look like pea-shooters- good luck to us all </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 18:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/jbradley/2012/01/13/the-la-times-spews-more-gas-than-truth-over-extraction/#IDComment265174513</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Golden Globes: In Which a Big Hollywood Writer Champions George Clooney - Twice!</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/lveneziani/2012/01/15/who-should-and-will-win-the-golden-globes-tonight/#IDComment265171257</link>
<description>Been watching Lynch, Bergman and thru season 3 of Angel- oh... a new year?  what Tony of NCIS not nominated?  have to wait till next year  - toodle-ooh </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 18:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/lveneziani/2012/01/15/who-should-and-will-win-the-golden-globes-tonight/#IDComment265171257</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : HBO On Defense: Writer Danny Strong Claims No Agenda Behind Palin Film</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2012/01/14/hbo-on-defense-writer-danny-strong-claims-no-agenda-behind-palin-film/#IDComment264658321</link>
<description>I luv Danny.  He was brilliant on Buffy- the little gnome.  So he writes huh?  Good for him. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 04:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2012/01/14/hbo-on-defense-writer-danny-strong-claims-no-agenda-behind-palin-film/#IDComment264658321</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Media Matters Tries To Stir Controversy Over Loesch, Limbaugh - Fails</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/driehl/2012/01/14/media-matters-tries-to-stir-controversy-over-loesch-limbaugh-fails/#IDComment264656583</link>
<description>Media Matters appears fixated on a mission to try and silence the free speech of Big Journalism editor Dana Loesch,- is there a fund to bail her out of jail? when is her court date- the article didn&amp;#039;t mention how she was punished and under what misguided law on the books Media Matters used to arrest her and silence her free speech.  Please let us readers know the facts! </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 04:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/driehl/2012/01/14/media-matters-tries-to-stir-controversy-over-loesch-limbaugh-fails/#IDComment264656583</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Morning Playlist: The &#039;Drive&#039; Soundtrack That Wasn&#039;t?</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/edulis/2012/01/06/morning-playlist-the-drive-soundtrack-that-wasnt/#IDComment259139969</link>
<description>Here we have the entire album &amp;ldquo;Themes for an Imaginary Film&amp;rdquo; from Symmetry, yet another project by Italodisco revivalist Johnny Jewel, known for his involvement in Chromatics/Glass Candy/Desire/all of the &amp;ldquo;Italians Do It Better&amp;rdquo; music label.  Curious, is there a manual I can get on line to help un-pack this opening???  Or is it saying- good beat, can dance to it in some kind of code.  [I must be getting old...] </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Jan 2012 03:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/edulis/2012/01/06/morning-playlist-the-drive-soundtrack-that-wasnt/#IDComment259139969</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Big Movie Flashback: &#039;Every Which Way But Loose&#039;</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2012/01/08/big-movie-flashback-every-which-way-but-loose/#IDComment259135705</link>
<description>ooh... better than Roadhouse- Ruth G vs Kelly L- u choose!  i&amp;#039;m with Kelly </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Jan 2012 03:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2012/01/08/big-movie-flashback-every-which-way-but-loose/#IDComment259135705</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Double Standards And The Reverend Wright</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/cjohnson/2011/12/23/double-standards-and-the-reverend-wright/#IDComment247981454</link>
<description>This article is an odd thing.   A comment notes the newletters were picked up by Reason first- which is how I understand the sequence.  Some comments note the anti-semitic vein in the Paul/libertarian org and I can attest to this troubling vein to the group.  I was at a party with the former Lib party prez candidate Badnarik and heard plenty of Jewish banker conspiracy stories.  And lastly, this putting Wright/newsletter points side by side- are we being asked to choose &amp;#039;our&amp;#039; anti-semite over theirs?  For me Paul stance on Iran is enuf to not support him &amp;amp; Obama&amp;#039;s stance on everything else lead to my support for the any Repub ham sandwich. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 21:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/cjohnson/2011/12/23/double-standards-and-the-reverend-wright/#IDComment247981454</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Attacks on Ron Paul: Mainstream Media Bait-and-Switch</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/jpollak/2011/12/24/attacks-on-ron-paul-mainstream-media-bait-and-switch/#IDComment247876629</link>
<description>I think you have it exactly right.  I spent time with Libertarians and the Paul kool-aid.  I heard about these newsletters from Reason.  And I&amp;#039;ve heard nothing to dissuade me that Paul&amp;#039;s fingerprints are all over it.  Why does it come up now? when hasn&amp;#039;t it been brought up?  I&amp;#039;ve followed this now 2-3 years. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 19:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/jpollak/2011/12/24/attacks-on-ron-paul-mainstream-media-bait-and-switch/#IDComment247876629</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Peace : The Iraq War Did Not End on December 17, 2011--But the Peace May Be Over Soon</title>
<link>http://bigpeace.com/jpollak/2011/12/17/the-iraq-war-did-not-end-on-december-17-2011-but-the-peace-may-be-over/#IDComment243007718</link>
<description>Fair enough. You made no claims whatsoever. So I&amp;#039;ve no idea what &amp;#039;see what that got us&amp;#039; means.&lt;br /&gt;  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;  &amp;lt;DIV style=\&quot;FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif; FONT-SIZE: 12pt\&quot;&amp;gt;  &amp;lt;DIV style=\&quot;FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif; FONT-SIZE: 12pt\&quot;&amp;gt;  &amp;lt;DIV style=\&quot;BORDER-BOTTOM: #ccc 1px solid; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0px; LINE-HEIGHT: 0; MARGIN: 5px 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 0px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; HEIGHT: 0px; FONT-SIZE: 0px; BORDER-TOP: #ccc 1px solid; BORDER-RIGHT: #ccc 1px solid; PADDING-TOP: 0px\&quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/DIV&amp;gt; </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 23:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigpeace.com/jpollak/2011/12/17/the-iraq-war-did-not-end-on-december-17-2011-but-the-peace-may-be-over/#IDComment243007718</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>