<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/279825</link>
		<description>Comments by snobographer</description>
<item>
<title>Big Journalism : Local NBC Butchers Occupy Cleveland Rape Case With Bias</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/jsexton/2011/10/20/local-nbc-butchers-with-bias-occupy-oakland-rape-case/#IDComment212814425</link>
<description>&amp;quot;Can you imagine a local news report on a rape allegation at a fraternity house taking this same perspective&amp;quot;  Yes. The DeAnza case, for instance, there was a lot of speculation in reporting on how the accusation would affect the futures of the defendants. Or how DSK&amp;#039;s or Julian Assange&amp;#039;s career aspirations would be affected by the accusations against them. And look at all the hand-wringing there&amp;#039;s been for poor poor Roman Polanski. In journalism and in commentary, being accused of sexual assault is regularly held up as a greater concern than being sexually assaulted. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 02:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/jsexton/2011/10/20/local-nbc-butchers-with-bias-occupy-oakland-rape-case/#IDComment212814425</guid>
</item><item>
<title>KOMO - Seattle, WA : Sex offender, father of 22: \&#039;I\&#039;m a womanizer\&#039; | Seattle News, Weather, Sports, Breaking News | KO</title>
<link>http://www.komonews.com/news/local/121958589.html#IDComment153700905</link>
<description>Hey, guys? Being a &amp;quot;womanizer&amp;quot; is not something to be proud of. Nor is it an excuse for not keeping your junk under control. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 02:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.komonews.com/news/local/121958589.html#IDComment153700905</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Womanist Musings : Nappy Hair In the Jolie-Pitt World</title>
<link>http://www.womanist-musings.com/2009/07/nappy-hair-in-jolie-pitt-world.html#IDComment28891442</link>
<description>Love that second comment calling Jolie a &amp;quot;whore,&amp;quot; also.  Oh shit! A woman&amp;#039;s done something I vaguely disapprove of? Quick! Better impugn her chastity and thereby her value as a person! Your windows are grimy; You&amp;#039;re a slut! Your dog needs a bath; You skank! You neglected to signal for that lane change; what a cum rag you are! Etcetera... </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 19:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.womanist-musings.com/2009/07/nappy-hair-in-jolie-pitt-world.html#IDComment28891442</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Womanist Musings : Meryl Streep and A Lack Of Sexiness</title>
<link>http://www.womanist-musings.com/2009/07/meryl-streep-and-lack-of-sexiness.html#IDComment28750003</link>
<description>I seem to remember hearing that Hoffman&amp;#039;s break-out role in &lt;i&gt;The Graduate&lt;/i&gt; was originally written for Robert Redford but, despite the strapping WASPiness of the character, Hoffman was given the role because of his impressive acting ability. Funny how I&amp;#039;ve never heard of an actress who looks like, say Heather Matarazzo or Kathy Bates being given a part that was originally written for someone like Scarlett Johanssen or Charlize Theron just because she&amp;#039;s such a compelling actress.  And wasn&amp;#039;t Dustin Hoffman in a rom com just last year? &lt;i&gt;Last Chance Harvey&lt;/i&gt;? And, as usual with rom-coms, wasn&amp;#039;t he 22 years older than his female co-lead, Emma Thompson? Yeah, male actors have it sooooo friggin&amp;#039; rough. *tiny violin* Show me a 70+ year old female actor in a leading role in a mainstream romantic comedy and I&amp;#039;ll eat a bug. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 18:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.womanist-musings.com/2009/07/meryl-streep-and-lack-of-sexiness.html#IDComment28750003</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Womanist Musings : Jamie Foxx On Miley Cyrus: Make A Sex Tape And Grow Up</title>
<link>http://www.womanist-musings.com/2009/04/jamie-fox-on-miley-cyrus-make-sex-tape.html#IDComment18797929</link>
<description>So does, say, Ann Coulter not have white privilege because she lacks male privilege?  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 19:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.womanist-musings.com/2009/04/jamie-fox-on-miley-cyrus-make-sex-tape.html#IDComment18797929</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Womanist Musings : Jamie Foxx On Miley Cyrus: Make A Sex Tape And Grow Up</title>
<link>http://www.womanist-musings.com/2009/04/jamie-fox-on-miley-cyrus-make-sex-tape.html#IDComment18796031</link>
<description>My point was that Foxx&amp;#039;s statements weren&amp;#039;t racist, they were sexist and misogynistic. And that Jamie Foxx has as much &lt;i&gt;male&lt;/i&gt; privilege as Don Imus does. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 19:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.womanist-musings.com/2009/04/jamie-fox-on-miley-cyrus-make-sex-tape.html#IDComment18796031</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Womanist Musings : Jamie Foxx On Miley Cyrus: Make A Sex Tape And Grow Up</title>
<link>http://www.womanist-musings.com/2009/04/jamie-fox-on-miley-cyrus-make-sex-tape.html#IDComment18795108</link>
<description>The gender dynamics were the same. Foxx didn&amp;#039;t say anything about race. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 18:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.womanist-musings.com/2009/04/jamie-fox-on-miley-cyrus-make-sex-tape.html#IDComment18795108</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Womanist Musings : Can A White Woman Be A Womanist?</title>
<link>http://www.womanist-musings.com/2009/04/can-white-woman-be-womanist.html#IDComment18320026</link>
<description>...and if someone&amp;#039;s accusing you of racism for criticizing whiteness, that person&amp;#039;s an idiot. Just saying. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 Apr 2009 21:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.womanist-musings.com/2009/04/can-white-woman-be-womanist.html#IDComment18320026</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Womanist Musings : Can A White Woman Be A Womanist?</title>
<link>http://www.womanist-musings.com/2009/04/can-white-woman-be-womanist.html#IDComment18319713</link>
<description>I think a white woman identifying as a womanist is like a man identifying as a womanist or a feminist. It&amp;#039;s nice that a person of privilege wants to identify with a group that doesn&amp;#039;t have that same privilege, but it&amp;#039;s just not entirely possible. There&amp;#039;s an old second-wave saying regarding men who seek to identify as feminists, that in order to be feminists the first thing they have to do is double their workload and cut their pay in half. That same saying would apply to white women seeking to identify as womanists.  As far as other intersections like disabilities, I don&amp;#039;t know if womanists are any better at including those than feminists but I still have some reading up to do. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 Apr 2009 21:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.womanist-musings.com/2009/04/can-white-woman-be-womanist.html#IDComment18319713</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Womanist Musings : This Is Why You&rsquo;re Fat</title>
<link>http://www.womanist-musings.com/2009/03/this-is-why-youre-fat.html#IDComment17812734</link>
<description>That blog cracks me up, but I agree about the title and subtitle. None of the fat people I&amp;#039;ve known eat stuff like that. No one I&amp;#039;ve ever known has eaten stuff like that. Except maybe some drunk college kids on a dare. By the way, I bought a head of cauliflower from Whole Foods a while back. Fucker ended up costing about $9.00. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 19:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.womanist-musings.com/2009/03/this-is-why-youre-fat.html#IDComment17812734</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Womanist Musings : OOOH The Mehnz Are Stooopid</title>
<link>http://www.womanist-musings.com/2009/03/oooh-mehnz-are-stooopid.html#IDComment17774959</link>
<description>But see, the difference, as has been explained, is that womanists and feminists are already taking action against PETA. MRAs don&amp;#039;t do a damn thing about male stereotypes in the media. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 01:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.womanist-musings.com/2009/03/oooh-mehnz-are-stooopid.html#IDComment17774959</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Womanist Musings : Womanism/Feminism&hellip;Feminism/Womanism</title>
<link>http://www.womanist-musings.com/2009/03/womanismfeminismfeminismwomanism.html#IDComment17770919</link>
<description>Ay! It stings when you point out my white privilege! Thanks for doing it, though. I like horsedequestion&amp;#039;s suggestion of employing the less-privileged group as the default. I already do that with female pronouns. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 22:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.womanist-musings.com/2009/03/womanismfeminismfeminismwomanism.html#IDComment17770919</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Womanist Musings : Sham Wow Guy Arrested For Battering A Sex Trade Worker</title>
<link>http://www.womanist-musings.com/2009/03/sham-wow-guy-arrested-for-battering-sex.html#IDComment17766938</link>
<description>&amp;quot;At least he had something to clean up the mess.&amp;quot; The mess as in her blood, I suppose. ha ha oh my sides. I didn&amp;#039;t think I could respect KO any less than I already did, but he continues to surprise me. As for the Sham-Wow guy, all people in infomercials come off as weirdly eager. It&amp;#039;s the nature of the job. I doubt most of them rent women and beat them up. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 20:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.womanist-musings.com/2009/03/sham-wow-guy-arrested-for-battering-sex.html#IDComment17766938</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Womanist Musings : OOOH The Mehnz Are Stooopid</title>
<link>http://www.womanist-musings.com/2009/03/oooh-mehnz-are-stooopid.html#IDComment17724183</link>
<description>&lt;i&gt;&amp;quot;I am not one of the men then takes offense at negative portrayals of men in the media.&amp;quot; &lt;/i&gt;  noted </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 02:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.womanist-musings.com/2009/03/oooh-mehnz-are-stooopid.html#IDComment17724183</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Womanist Musings : OOOH The Mehnz Are Stooopid</title>
<link>http://www.womanist-musings.com/2009/03/oooh-mehnz-are-stooopid.html#IDComment17722796</link>
<description>I said nothing about you being OFFENDED. I don&amp;#039;t give a flying fig whether you&amp;#039;re OFFENDED. You&amp;#039;ve stated repeatedly that you don&amp;#039;t care about the issue of dumb dads in sitcoms, which is what this discussion is about. You&amp;#039;ve sucked up enough oxygen with your disINTEREST. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 01:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.womanist-musings.com/2009/03/oooh-mehnz-are-stooopid.html#IDComment17722796</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Womanist Musings : OOOH The Mehnz Are Stooopid</title>
<link>http://www.womanist-musings.com/2009/03/oooh-mehnz-are-stooopid.html#IDComment17721920</link>
<description>I wasn&amp;#039;t replying to you. But I get it. You don&amp;#039;t care about the topic of this discussion. Roger. Loud and clear. Over and out. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 01:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.womanist-musings.com/2009/03/oooh-mehnz-are-stooopid.html#IDComment17721920</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Womanist Musings : OOOH The Mehnz Are Stooopid</title>
<link>http://www.womanist-musings.com/2009/03/oooh-mehnz-are-stooopid.html#IDComment17721402</link>
<description>The discussion is about MRAs whinging about dumb sitcom dads, which are almost exclusively created by male television executives, and whether womanists and feminists should put much energy into the issue when their plates are already full with rape, FGM, partner violence, etc. If you don&amp;#039;t care about this topic, and would prefer to discuss rape myths and your own fallacies of generalization, you should go to wherever people discuss such things. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 00:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.womanist-musings.com/2009/03/oooh-mehnz-are-stooopid.html#IDComment17721402</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Womanist Musings : OOOH The Mehnz Are Stooopid</title>
<link>http://www.womanist-musings.com/2009/03/oooh-mehnz-are-stooopid.html#IDComment17720189</link>
<description>...by whining on a womanist blog about something you have no intention of doing anything about. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 00:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.womanist-musings.com/2009/03/oooh-mehnz-are-stooopid.html#IDComment17720189</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Womanist Musings : OOOH The Mehnz Are Stooopid</title>
<link>http://www.womanist-musings.com/2009/03/oooh-mehnz-are-stooopid.html#IDComment17719529</link>
<description>&lt;i&gt;&amp;quot;As far as my comments to you, I am correcting your mispeaking of facts. Something you&amp;#039;ve yet to address. Your bait and switch isn&amp;#039;t working.&amp;quot;&lt;/i&gt;    Oh, okay. When I said, &amp;quot;&amp;#039;people&amp;#039; take women SO much more seriously than men ... That&amp;#039;s why women run everything.&amp;quot; That was sarcasm. Sorry you didn&amp;#039;t pick up on it. I assumed it was obvious. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 00:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.womanist-musings.com/2009/03/oooh-mehnz-are-stooopid.html#IDComment17719529</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Womanist Musings : OOOH The Mehnz Are Stooopid</title>
<link>http://www.womanist-musings.com/2009/03/oooh-mehnz-are-stooopid.html#IDComment17717880</link>
<description>For someone who doesn&amp;#039;t care about this issue, you sure do go on about it. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 23:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.womanist-musings.com/2009/03/oooh-mehnz-are-stooopid.html#IDComment17717880</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>