snideissue
58p153 comments posted · 0 followers · following 0
5 years ago @ The Reality-Based Comm... - Ahead of My Time? · 0 replies · +3 points
5 years ago @ The Reality-Based Comm... - Ahead of My Time? · 1 reply · +2 points
Besides, in countries with bomb control, things still explode. Boilers, gas lines, sewers, cellphones. Do you want to live in filth, tossing your poo out the window, in a cold damp home, with no cellphone? Didn't think so.
5 years ago @ The Reality-Based Comm... - Trump Campaign Non-Dis... · 0 replies · +2 points
And when you consider how steep the competition is for most odious human on earth, with strong bids from Omarosa, Bannon, Miller, Gorka, Sessions, Conway, Flynn, Manafort, Ross, Zinke and Pruitt, you can see why he might be worried. And that's just the White House Division. To claim the prize, Trump then has to beat whoever wins in the International Division, which includes Erdogan, Assad, Le Pen, Putin, Farage and BoJo (among others), as well as the champs in the Congressional Division and the Non-Fake News Division. (There are so many strong competitors in these brackets, space and incipient nausea prevent me from even trying to list them, but they know who they are, and so do you.) And you still have the Wild Cards like Weinstein and Cosby, Kobach and Corey Stewart, Spencer and Duke and even good old KSM. (It's my understanding that Roy Moore has withdrawn from the tournament to spend more time at the Gadsen Mall, but he will present the award that goes to the winner of the swimsuit competition. Don't ask, and if you do, be warned that Speedos are involved.)
So I say, let the poor man have his NDAs. He's been working toward the championship at least since he suckled at the teat of Roy Cohn (indecency sensei non-pareil); it's the only thing he's ever worked hard at. Well that, and getting into shape for the swimsuit competition.
5 years ago @ The Reality-Based Comm... - The Red Hen, the baker... · 0 replies · +4 points
Back to the real world. If it were possible for every single liberal and member of the resistance to model grace at all times and in all circumstances, I think that would be more effective than refusing to serve SHS or publicly confronting Trump admin officials, and would provide a great contrast to the moral horror of constant incivility, open hostility and gratuitous cruelty that emanates from Trump every day, several times a day. This is what Jackie Robinson did in his first season in the Bigs. It's why MLK, Jr. and Gandhi preached nonviolence.
As difficult as it was for Robinson, his actions were subject to his control. If a bunch of folks had gotten together to harass some opposing player who treated Robinson badly, opponents of integration would've used it, effectively, to discredit Robinson even though he was modeling opposite behavior. And of course, King (and Gandhi, I assume) was assailed for actions, like the riots in the Long, Hot Summer, beyond his control; again, effectively. History books show blacks getting firehosed, beaten, having food dumped on their heads, but to his opponents, he wasn't martyred for nonviolent resistance, but instead paid the price for his alleged advocacy of violence and disorder.
And even here, you cite the outburst of a hothead congressperson, one of 194 House Dems, most of whom aren't inciting any kind of disruption, in contrast to the actions of the Dem leaders of the Senate and House. If any one congressperson can trump Party leadership, then how on earth is anyone supposed to stop that?
Here's the deal. The Trump admin is a moral abomination unlike anything in recent memory. He's abetted by talk radio, Evangelical apologists and websites that were considered beyond the fringe, by conservatives, a few years ago. The resistance is vast collection of individual actors, some of whom are profoundly decent people, some of whom aren't. When organized into marches, they've been peaceful and respectful. Individually, some have crossed the line, and others will in the future. But, unless we're in for a whole lot of darkness, in the future the resistance will be seen as Children of the Light, as Gandhi, King, anti-Nazi resisters and anti-slavery advocates are. And Trump and his minions will be seen as the dark, malevolent creatures they are. And the people who criticized Trump's critics for intemperance will be forgotten.
5 years ago @ The Reality-Based Comm... - The Red Hen, the baker... · 0 replies · +3 points
5 years ago @ The Reality-Based Comm... - Arbeit Macht Frei · 0 replies · +2 points
5 years ago @ The Reality-Based Comm... - What Have We Become · 0 replies · +3 points
"Once the rockets are up, who cares where they come down?" "That's not my department," says Werner von Braun.
If anyone who reads this is unfamiliar with the inestimable work of Tom Lehrer, hie quickly over to YouTube and check it out. You will not be sorry.
5 years ago @ The Reality-Based Comm... - The smoking gun and th... · 0 replies · +3 points
Trump could shoot Sean Hannity in broad daylight in Times Square and Hannity would use his last breath, if it came to that, to make it clear that he had it coming, it was an accident, it wasn't Trump, he was hypnotized by one of Hillary's pedophile Svengalis, or, he wasn't shot at all, just had a rare disease that causes spontaneous wounds and bleeding. Take your pick, or make up your own. And be sure to find out what Kanye thinks,
5 years ago @ The Reality-Based Comm... - Television Was Not Alw... · 1 reply · +2 points
The Wasteland today is indeed vast and deep, but the non-Wasteland, however you define it, is vast and deep too. Also, in the current environment, I find it difficult to judge people for their viewing choices. In particular, I think the Bachelor is execrable, and I used to think that anyone who likes it must be a bad person. But perusing the internet, I find that some critics whose taste I mostly agree with on other things, and whose consumption and appreciation of more "highbrow" culture seems to exceed mine, seem to love it. (Heck, my sister is a good person and she loves Adam Sandler. ) To each his or her own, I guess.
6 years ago @ The Reality-Based Comm... - Deflection, Part III · 0 replies · +1 points
Or are you saying that as a result of Citizens United, this part of election law is unenforceable? That's what Obama implied in a SOTU that drew a silent "not true" from Justice Alito; "Last week, the Supreme Court reversed a century of law to open the floodgates for special interests — including foreign corporations — to spend without limit in our elections," Obama said. "Well I don’t think American elections should be bankrolled by America’s most powerful interests, or worse, by foreign entities." I need to refresh myself on CU, but as far as I'm aware, it didn't strike down the ban on foreign contributions. Apparently, Alito didn't think so either, or he just got so worked up by the Kenyan poseur pretending to be President that he temporarily forgot what CU says.