<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/486336</link>
		<description>Comments by snapmandonald</description>
<item>
<title>/Film : AVATAR Trailer on Transformers 2?</title>
<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/05/20/avatar-trailer-on-transformers-2/#IDComment21973490</link>
<description>It will not be &amp;quot;attached&amp;quot; to Transformers 2, the studios attach a film from their own studio. The trailer may be in the can and debut with Transformers, but there is no way that Paramount would use its very valuable attached trailer spot for another studio&amp;#039;s film. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 12:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/05/20/avatar-trailer-on-transformers-2/#IDComment21973490</guid>
</item><item>
<title>/Film : Regal Cinemas To Go 4K Digital</title>
<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/05/17/regal-cinemas-to-go-4k-digital/#IDComment21746400</link>
<description>Generally you have a base server which is connected to each of the projectors, each projector has its own computer/server. The main server/computer downloads the films and from there you send them out to each individual projector.  </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 07:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/05/17/regal-cinemas-to-go-4k-digital/#IDComment21746400</guid>
</item><item>
<title>/Film : Box Office: Wolverine Claws to $34.75M Friday; Could Scratch Out $86.8M Opening Weekend</title>
<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/05/02/box-office-wolverine-claws-to-3475m-friday-could-scratch-out-868m-opening-weekend/#IDComment20411984</link>
<description>and yes Star Trek could have a Iron Man-esque multiplier but its opening weekend will be nowhere near what Iron Man did. A 50-60 million opening weekend with a 3.3 multiplier is not nearly as impressive as a movie than can hold up like that after opening close to 100 million. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 2 May 2009 09:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/05/02/box-office-wolverine-claws-to-3475m-friday-could-scratch-out-868m-opening-weekend/#IDComment20411984</guid>
</item><item>
<title>/Film : Box Office: Wolverine Claws to $34.75M Friday; Could Scratch Out $86.8M Opening Weekend</title>
<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/05/02/box-office-wolverine-claws-to-3475m-friday-could-scratch-out-868m-opening-weekend/#IDComment20411930</link>
<description>Can we please quit pretending like Twitter has any real effect on box office grosses? Please... </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 2 May 2009 09:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/05/02/box-office-wolverine-claws-to-3475m-friday-could-scratch-out-868m-opening-weekend/#IDComment20411930</guid>
</item><item>
<title>/Film : District 9 Teaser Trailer</title>
<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/04/30/district-9-teaser-trailer/#IDComment20328554</link>
<description>Just an FYI, the trailer is not attached to Wolverine. It is loose in the can with select prints (though it wasn&amp;#039;t with my print). The only film attached to Wolverine is Night at the Museum 2. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 1 May 2009 07:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/04/30/district-9-teaser-trailer/#IDComment20328554</guid>
</item><item>
<title>/Film : Trademark Filed For Fallout Movie Adaptation</title>
<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/04/21/trademark-filed-for-fallout-movie-adaptation/#IDComment19601074</link>
<description>Lets hope not. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/04/21/trademark-filed-for-fallout-movie-adaptation/#IDComment19601074</guid>
</item><item>
<title>/Film : Trademark Filed For Fallout Movie Adaptation</title>
<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/04/21/trademark-filed-for-fallout-movie-adaptation/#IDComment19593718</link>
<description>The fallout series (minus Brotherhood of Steel) is collectively the greatest game series I&amp;#039;ve ever played. I am very skeptical that they could do it justice in a film, but if done right it could be amazing. Please Please don&amp;#039;t let anyone ruin this series, keep the people from Max Payne as far away as possible. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/04/21/trademark-filed-for-fallout-movie-adaptation/#IDComment19593718</guid>
</item><item>
<title>/Film : Photo Surfaces of Saoirse Ronan as Susie in Peter Jackson&#039;s The Lovely Bones</title>
<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/04/19/photo-surfaces-of-saoirse-ronan-as-susie-in-peter-jacksons-the-lovely-bones/#IDComment19397486</link>
<description>I enjoyed the book, and am looking forward to the movie. That photo however doesn&amp;#039;t excite me any, the heaven that Susie lived in wash much more interesting that just a bunch of clouds...   Even ripping off the &amp;quot;heaven&amp;quot; from What Dreams May Come would be better (but not by much) than her floating around in the clouds. I will assume that Peter Jackson wouldn&amp;#039;t allow it to be that the whole movie, or at least I hope. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 01:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/04/19/photo-surfaces-of-saoirse-ronan-as-susie-in-peter-jacksons-the-lovely-bones/#IDComment19397486</guid>
</item><item>
<title>/Film : Bruno Gets Rated R</title>
<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/04/16/bruno-gets-rated-r/#IDComment19378357</link>
<description>I am certain since this was a studio film the MPAA gave them a specific list of what had to be cut out of the film. Probably just a few seconds here and there, I bet it was inane as &amp;quot;he can hold the dildos, but they can&amp;#039;t zoom in on them&amp;quot;. Things that really don&amp;#039;t make any difference to the story, but the idiots at the MPAA can feel good about themselves at how they protected the children. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 22:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/04/16/bruno-gets-rated-r/#IDComment19378357</guid>
</item><item>
<title>/Film : 28 Months Later Confirmed, Fox Atomic To Fold?</title>
<link>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/04/19/28-months-later-confirmed-fox-atomic-to-fold/#IDComment19377739</link>
<description>I am not sure why they even created Atomic, it always struck me as a even stupider segment of the Fox studio umbrella, which is pretty hard to do as bad as Fox runs itself.  Perhaps they should take whomever is running Fox Searchlight and give them the keys to the whole studio, Searchlight seems to be the only segment that has a clue as to what they are doing. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 22:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.slashfilm.com/2009/04/19/28-months-later-confirmed-fox-atomic-to-fold/#IDComment19377739</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>