<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/1091452</link>
		<description>Comments by sjleonard</description>
<item>
<title>KeithHennessey.com : Obama Economy Facts</title>
<link>http://keithhennessey.com/2010/08/16/obama-economy-facts/#IDComment93467331</link>
<description>Check out the first few paragraphs. Mr. Hennessey didn&amp;#039;t write the title of the article, that was the Daily News&amp;#039; doing. I&amp;#039;ve never seen Mr. Hennessey refer to President Obama as anything other than the President or President Obama.   But I do agree with some of your sentiment. I subscribed to this blog because of its detail/specificity. (Example: the post on the phrase &amp;quot;too big to fail.&amp;quot; Is it those banks couldn&amp;#039;t fail? That we didn&amp;#039;t want them to? Awesome.) This post, compared to previous posts, is severely lacking in detail. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 15:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://keithhennessey.com/2010/08/16/obama-economy-facts/#IDComment93467331</guid>
</item><item>
<title>KeithHennessey.com : Comparing Obama economics to Clinton economics</title>
<link>http://keithhennessey.com/2010/08/04/clinton-v-obama/#IDComment90865874</link>
<description>Thanks for the post, I enjoyed reading this.  I think President Clinton&amp;#039;s surplus/defecit signs are reversed in your spreadsheet.  Unless I&amp;#039;m reading this wrong the 1993 - 2001 average balance should be a defecit, not surplus.  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 4 Aug 2010 21:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://keithhennessey.com/2010/08/04/clinton-v-obama/#IDComment90865874</guid>
</item><item>
<title>KeithHennessey.com : When Presidents attack</title>
<link>http://keithhennessey.com/2010/07/19/attack/#IDComment87701779</link>
<description>I agree with what you&amp;#039;re saying Eric, although I would not have used the word &amp;quot;corrupted&amp;quot; b/c it could imply illegality.  Unfortunately this level of political showmanship is not illegal.   I think Democrats, Republicans, and Anarcho Syndicalist Communists will all agree that our budget deficit is not a new problem.  Yet President Obama, in almost every conversation on the issue I&amp;#039;ve seen, blames President Bush for the problem.  Spuriously.  On the other hand $35 b in spending cuts will unfortunately not make a small dent in the deficit, right?  So why, to repeat what I thought was an excellent point, conflate these two issues? </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://keithhennessey.com/2010/07/19/attack/#IDComment87701779</guid>
</item><item>
<title>KeithHennessey.com : The President&rsquo;s recess appointment of Dr. Donald Berwick</title>
<link>http://keithhennessey.com/2010/07/07/the-presidents-recess-appointment-of-dr-donald-berwick/#IDComment85382496</link>
<description>@generic: I think you&amp;#039;re correct in saying both sides play too much politics. But I don&amp;#039;t think we (we = Americans. I know, v. general) get anywhere by justifying this sort of maneuvering by pointing fingers. We (again, Americans) want something better, right? Lets hold everyone, not no one, accountable.   This being said, I&amp;#039;d like to point out that anyone can see a copy of IHI&amp;#039;s IRS 2008 and 2009 Form 990s. You can register for free to download PDFs at &lt;a href=&quot;http:\/\/www.guidestar.org&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guidestar.org&lt;/a&gt;&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;www.guidestar.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. This form does not list specific donors, but does inform this discussion.   What I think is notable (this is all tax year 2009):   Total revenue: about $35 million. About $11 million from non gov&amp;#039;t contributions/grants.   Dr. Berwick salary: about $2.3 million   The organization DOES have a written conflict of interest policy.   The organization is all over the place.  America, Europe, Africa.  One program I saw is a partnership with the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation to reduce the rate of childhood mortality in Ghana.   </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 Jul 2010 21:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://keithhennessey.com/2010/07/07/the-presidents-recess-appointment-of-dr-donald-berwick/#IDComment85382496</guid>
</item><item>
<title>KeithHennessey.com : Oil spill crisis as opportunity</title>
<link>http://keithhennessey.com/2010/06/16/war-on-fossil-fuels/#IDComment80439963</link>
<description>Great post, I enjoyed reading this.  I have two questions:  What is stopping a Congressman from proposing stricter drilling regulations?  Why is the President proposing a cap-and-trade system instead of a simple carbon tax?   </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 15:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://keithhennessey.com/2010/06/16/war-on-fossil-fuels/#IDComment80439963</guid>
</item><item>
<title>KeithHennessey.com : Headed in the right direction. Must go faster.</title>
<link>http://keithhennessey.com/2010/05/19/must-go-faster/#IDComment76230178</link>
<description>Glad to see another post.  This is by far my favorite blog.  Update more often!  Shouldn&amp;#039;t one account for inflated housing prices when discussing pre-recession GDP?    If homes were overvalued during the 2000s, and financial firms/institutions/investors for a time made a lot of cash from skyrocketing home prices through derivatives of various kinds, wouldn&amp;#039;t this mean that some portion of pre-recession GDP growth wasn&amp;#039;t really growth at all?  Housing&amp;#039;s contribution may be negligible.  But if it is not, I think it would be fair to adjust the recovery threshhold down to compensate for this fake, housing-bubble growth. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 19:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://keithhennessey.com/2010/05/19/must-go-faster/#IDComment76230178</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>