sir_humphrey

sir_humphrey

37p

244 comments posted · 1 followers · following 0

301 weeks ago @ Conservative Home - Why Tim quit · 0 replies · +1 points

You're a parody, aren't you?

301 weeks ago @ Conservative Home - Why Tim quit · 1 reply · +1 points

"We should be taking a lead from the Republicans in America."

Why exactly?

304 weeks ago @ Conservative Home - How will Britain vote ... · 1 reply · +1 points

It was 3.8 million votes.

332 weeks ago @ Conservative Home - Don't let's be beastly... · 1 reply · +1 points

By who? Indeed, some of the posts on these threads do end up in wingnut territory, but that's what happens when you essentially have no argument beyond a moral one.

332 weeks ago @ Conservative Home - Virginia Utley: Please... · 2 replies · +1 points

I appreciate this article was garbage to begin with, but do you at least have an intelligent thought to share on the topic?

332 weeks ago @ Conservative Home - Virginia Utley: Please... · 8 replies · +1 points

Exactly. It may be dissolved, but until someone applies to do so, it remains a valid marriage.

You look like a wingnut when you try to explain away same-sex marriage through legal technicalities. I'm sure this goes down reasonably well in UKIP circles, but I thought even that party had moved on by now.

By all means object on moral grounds, but leave it at that.

332 weeks ago @ Conservative Home - Virginia Utley: Please... · 10 replies · +1 points

There's no requirement for sex in any marriage. Just because a marriage a voidable for non-consummation, does not make it an invalid marriage until that occurs.

332 weeks ago @ Conservative Home - Virginia Utley: Please... · 0 replies · +1 points

Thank you for posting such a sensible riposte to this rubbish. That said, it's true the law could take into account this type of situation where immediate family members reside together. It's been raised before.

332 weeks ago @ Conservative Home - Virginia Utley: Please... · 0 replies · +1 points

What happens if I and my wife decide not to have kids? Do we not have a real marriage in your eyes?

332 weeks ago @ Conservative Home - Don't let's be beastly... · 3 replies · +1 points

I think people who disagree are seen as irrelevant on this issue, since we already have SSM. I certainly would not think of them as fringe nutters.