Mr Ramadhar pls advise us on the following:
Firstly were you consulted on the decision to award “silk”?”
Secondly explain to the country what criteria was used by the AG for his selection and the basis for his choice in selecting the persons for silk.
Thirdly were you consulted and were you part of the decision to put this country into a State of Emergency.
Fourthy “ Were you shown the evidence and agreed that there was an assassination plot which is now not true?”
Fifthly “Did you agree with the decision to lock up people who were later freed because of the faux pas and mistakes made by charging them due to insufficient evidence under the anti gang legislation?
If you were consulted I mean not just given information but part of meaningful discussions then I am surprised that COP has now shifted from a party of transparency and integrity to a party that is now subsumed under the UNC and its ideals.

Mr AG is it true that there were about 27 names and how come it reached 16 names. Who was struck off the list persons who did not sing to your tune. WE want to see the list of persons who was recommended by the Law Association and the Chief Justice. Especially when the Law Association is now saying they were not consulted on the short list.

I have a question for Mr. Dookeran and it is this "Were you not part of the decision making process when the PM appointed silk?" If your answer is NO then why did the PM make the announcement, leave Trinidad and you in the hot seat. I am not interested in any debate on silk. You as COP and other members of COP who cliams that you all have integrity must ask serious questions. First question the CJ stated that he made nominations for silk who are these nominees and were they appointed. Second we want a list of all nominees that applied for silk since the CJ cliams he was not on the list. How are these arbitrary appointments made.