<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/641691</link>
		<description>Comments by shanebugbee</description>
<item>
<title>Big Hollywood : The National Endowment for the Art of Persuasion?</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/pcourrielche/2009/08/25/the-national-endowment-for-the-art-of-persuasion-patrick-courrielche/#IDComment32056500</link>
<description>The NEA died way back in 1989 - when they couldn&amp;#039;t, wouldn&amp;#039;t stand up for mapplethorpe... when the let witkins books be torn apart by mr. helms, without attacking back... without trying to explain to the general public why mappelthorpe is a-ok and why it&amp;#039;s just wrong to rip apart books and attack art... period.  art is to be understood or ignored, not burned - art will never fit into the peg holes.  what the nea did back in 1989 was made art a job, where you had to go to school and LEARN art so you could be employed and taken seriously - that isn&amp;#039;t art, it&amp;#039;s work.  the nea has been dead for years... the &amp;#039;artists&amp;#039; who use their talents only to gain fame and fortune are the real traitors... and should be treated as such.  &amp;quot;Previously shackled with the controversy over the Serrano and Mapplethorpe images of 1989 that escalated to a debate over its very existence, the NEA needs to stay far away from any questions of impropriety.&amp;quot; </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 18:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/pcourrielche/2009/08/25/the-national-endowment-for-the-art-of-persuasion-patrick-courrielche/#IDComment32056500</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>