<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/2657475</link>
		<description>Comments by sgt_stedanko</description>
<item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : State Senator Protests Anti-Abortion Bill: &#039;If I Wanted The Government In My Womb, I’d F*ck A Sena</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/state-senator-protests-anti-abortion-bill-if-i-wanted-the-government-in-my-womb-id-fck-a-senator/#IDComment306717683</link>
<description>let me guess, free to be as classless and clueless as you want to be because youre from a poor, uneducated, minority district that could care less so long as you look like them? kind of like claiming an island can tip over, or that astronauts have been to mars. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 3 Mar 2012 02:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/state-senator-protests-anti-abortion-bill-if-i-wanted-the-government-in-my-womb-id-fck-a-senator/#IDComment306717683</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Brown University Professor: Contraception Mandate Opponents &#039;Arsonists&#039; </title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/brown-university-professor-contraception-mandate-opponents-arsonists/#IDComment306707135</link>
<description>i&amp;#039;ll see you rushbo, and raise you jeremiah wright. still want to play? </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 3 Mar 2012 01:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/brown-university-professor-contraception-mandate-opponents-arsonists/#IDComment306707135</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Brown University Professor: Contraception Mandate Opponents &#039;Arsonists&#039; </title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/brown-university-professor-contraception-mandate-opponents-arsonists/#IDComment306705985</link>
<description>damn, you beat me to it. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 3 Mar 2012 01:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/brown-university-professor-contraception-mandate-opponents-arsonists/#IDComment306705985</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Brown University Professor: Contraception Mandate Opponents &#039;Arsonists&#039; </title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/brown-university-professor-contraception-mandate-opponents-arsonists/#IDComment306705662</link>
<description>another professor of &amp;quot;african studies&amp;quot;.... just an empty degree. what makes her an expert on anything? the fact that she&amp;#039;s a woman?  </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 3 Mar 2012 01:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/brown-university-professor-contraception-mandate-opponents-arsonists/#IDComment306705662</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Obama To UAW: Don&#039;t Let Them Call You &#039;Special Interest&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/obama-to-uaw-dont-let-them-call-you-special-interest/#IDComment304232200</link>
<description>the only people cheering that &amp;quot;im my brother&amp;#039;s keeper&amp;quot; crap are the ones with their hands in others&amp;#039; pockets. if i&amp;#039;m my brother&amp;#039;s keeper is a value, then did you ask you good old friend ted kennedy why he couln&amp;#039;t pull that poor sister mary jo out of her car in chappaquiddick? </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 03:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/obama-to-uaw-dont-let-them-call-you-special-interest/#IDComment304232200</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Teachers Unions Opt for Plastic Sugery on Taxpayers&#039; Dime</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/bshapiro/2012/02/28/teachers-unions-opt-for-plastic-sugery-on-taxpayers-dime/#IDComment304062770</link>
<description>these are the stories that need to come out more. how can any taxpayer not be pissed from reading this? </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 22:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/bshapiro/2012/02/28/teachers-unions-opt-for-plastic-sugery-on-taxpayers-dime/#IDComment304062770</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Peace : America&#039;s Military Might Eclipsed by Diplomatic Weakness</title>
<link>http://bigpeace.com/awrhawkins/2012/02/28/americas-military-might-eclipsed-by-diplomatic-weakness/#IDComment303934762</link>
<description>there was a certain american tire manufacturer plant in vietnam during the war. the american troops were not allowed to get anywhere near it. so the north vietnamese had their troops stationed and operating from there. this was common knowledge, yet nothing was done about it to attempt to actually win the war. and that is how these things are actually fought. the longer a war is fought, the more money is borrowed. the more the banksters profit. the last paragraph should read; the next time they throw a grenade at us we hit em with everything we have. and if we are not allowed to do so then bring these kids home, every last one of them. because what&amp;#039;s the point? screw those dirty sand people. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 19:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigpeace.com/awrhawkins/2012/02/28/americas-military-might-eclipsed-by-diplomatic-weakness/#IDComment303934762</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : John Bolton, Iraq War Vet Square Off </title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/john-bolton-iraq-war-vet-square-off/#IDComment301050876</link>
<description>americans got tired of borrowing money from china, devaluing currency, and turning millions into debt slaves by a &amp;quot;conservative.&amp;quot; why the hell turn out to vote when republicans are deficit spending like no liberal has ever done? these wars cost actual money. screw iraq and those people. it was the emminent threat of wmds that sent us into iraq. all those other arguments didnt amount to squat because the public opinion was against invasion.  this is still a country for and by the people.  </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 04:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/john-bolton-iraq-war-vet-square-off/#IDComment301050876</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : John Bolton, Iraq War Vet Square Off </title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/john-bolton-iraq-war-vet-square-off/#IDComment301047324</link>
<description>that is debatable. my point was that the answer bolton provided was nowhere near the realm of the discussion. it made absolutely no sense.  </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 04:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/john-bolton-iraq-war-vet-square-off/#IDComment301047324</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Santorum Responds: Specter Opposing Me Shows How &#039;Strong Of A Conservative I Am&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/santorum-responds-specter-opposing-me-shows-how-strong-of-a-conservative-i-am/#IDComment301045535</link>
<description>that&amp;#039;s how he reasons. like saying that the rebels in syria would be anti-iranian simply because the current regime is pro-iran and that is why we need to arm them. it is called jumping to conclusions. lazy logic that sells well with stupid people and those with an agenda. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 04:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/santorum-responds-specter-opposing-me-shows-how-strong-of-a-conservative-i-am/#IDComment301045535</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : John Bolton, Iraq War Vet Square Off </title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/john-bolton-iraq-war-vet-square-off/#IDComment300950125</link>
<description>does being a conservative now automatically mean that you must argue in favor of all military actions and occupations of foreign countries? even when the argument for going in in the first place has been proven false? and people wonder how obama got elected. lol. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 01:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/john-bolton-iraq-war-vet-square-off/#IDComment300950125</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : John Bolton, Iraq War Vet Square Off </title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/john-bolton-iraq-war-vet-square-off/#IDComment300948822</link>
<description>bolton is a clown. what kind of an answer was that? is he on meds? the kid asked him about blowback and he started talking about abuses and military law. if anybody thinks that answer made any sense they are fools. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 00:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/john-bolton-iraq-war-vet-square-off/#IDComment300948822</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Poll: 50% Believe Obama&#039;s First Term A Failure</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/poll-50-believe-obamas-first-term-a-failure/#IDComment300101199</link>
<description>it&amp;#039;s the game you have to play when disagreeing with him so that they dont brand you a skinhead. nobody likes that arrogant douchebag. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 23:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/poll-50-believe-obamas-first-term-a-failure/#IDComment300101199</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Poll: 50% Believe Obama&#039;s First Term A Failure</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/poll-50-believe-obamas-first-term-a-failure/#IDComment300079985</link>
<description>the dow has doubled and unemployment is still at 9%. 15% in my state. tell me again how this guy represents the 99%??? 44% of the people are tools and minorities. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 22:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/poll-50-believe-obamas-first-term-a-failure/#IDComment300079985</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Paul: We Encourage Iran To Go Nuclear Because We Threaten Them</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/paul-we-encourage-iran-to-go-nuclear-because-we-threaten-them/#IDComment299783412</link>
<description>legalize pot nomination.... how lazy are you? and why dont you go on and tell the rest of us what a &amp;quot;republican&amp;quot; is supposed to be? pro gun control, abortion, and government health care like romney? or how about deficit spending, no federal program left behind, shady washington influence peddling, i still support the decision to send american troops to die even after no wmds are found rick? these guys are apologizing, spinning reality, and changing their positions on issues every single debate. they have a voting record that they all want you to ignore and just believe the words coming out of their minds. career politicians who both failed at even that at the state level. that&amp;#039;s the best you can do for &amp;quot;republicans&amp;quot;? sorry, i guess i want my president to have balls and conviction. too much to ask when dealing with a bunch of lawyers. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 14:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/paul-we-encourage-iran-to-go-nuclear-because-we-threaten-them/#IDComment299783412</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Paul: We Encourage Iran To Go Nuclear Because We Threaten Them</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/paul-we-encourage-iran-to-go-nuclear-because-we-threaten-them/#IDComment299523322</link>
<description>his supporters&amp;#039; votes dont matter. says yet another guy scared to death that he might run as an independent.... you know you dont believe that, why say it? or is that just your funny way of coming out swinging? i love how the hate for his ideals turns people into blatant liars. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 06:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/paul-we-encourage-iran-to-go-nuclear-because-we-threaten-them/#IDComment299523322</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Paul: We Encourage Iran To Go Nuclear Because We Threaten Them</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/paul-we-encourage-iran-to-go-nuclear-because-we-threaten-them/#IDComment299520238</link>
<description>no mention of his economic argument? how about a caption that reads; Paul: this country is in an economic crisis and all these wars lead to deficit spending which devalues the dollar and creates poverty and inflation in america. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 06:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/paul-we-encourage-iran-to-go-nuclear-because-we-threaten-them/#IDComment299520238</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Santorum On Vote For &#039;No Child Left Behind&#039;: I Took One For the Team</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/santorum-on-vote-for-no-child-left-behind-i-took-one-for-the-team/#IDComment299516257</link>
<description>&amp;quot;i voted against the principles i believed in&amp;quot; that is not admiting a mistake. that is blaming bush for the mistake and admiting that you are nothing more than a spineless politician. EXPOSED!!!! </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 05:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/santorum-on-vote-for-no-child-left-behind-i-took-one-for-the-team/#IDComment299516257</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Santorum On Vote For &#039;No Child Left Behind&#039;: I Took One For the Team</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/santorum-on-vote-for-no-child-left-behind-i-took-one-for-the-team/#IDComment299513866</link>
<description>he didnt propose that we give strength to a murderous mid east theocrat? what do you call arming an ambiguous mid east uprising based around the islamic religion? </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 05:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/santorum-on-vote-for-no-child-left-behind-i-took-one-for-the-team/#IDComment299513866</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Peace : Santorum: Arm Syrian Rebels</title>
<link>http://bigpeace.com/bshapiro/2012/02/22/santorum-arm-syrian-rebels/#IDComment299344819</link>
<description>since this regime is allied with the iranian regime, then the rebel regime, once establishing authority, would have to be anti-iranian?? what a fool. grade school logic at best. what makes this guy such an authority on syria? </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 00:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigpeace.com/bshapiro/2012/02/22/santorum-arm-syrian-rebels/#IDComment299344819</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>