<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/731483</link>
		<description>Comments by Sam Aparicio</description>
<item>
<title>Nielsen Wire : iPhone vs. Android</title>
<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/iphone-vs-android/#IDComment83298988</link>
<description>When you get down to the practical level of choosing one device vs the other, especially in a small business context, it&amp;#039;s important to identify what each device does better.  I wrote a &lt;a href=&quot;http:\/\/www.ringio.com\/2010\/06\/29\/iphone-vs-android-getting-over-the-hype\/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;iphone vs android&lt;/a&gt; hype-free article over at the Ringio blog. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 02:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/iphone-vs-android/#IDComment83298988</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Gabriel Weinberg&#039;s Blog : My Apple Tablet (iSlate) Use Case: Baby Following - Gabriel Weinberg\&#039;s Blog</title>
<link>http://www.gabrielweinberg.com/blog/2010/01/my-apple-tablet-islate-use-case-baby-following.html#IDComment54286591</link>
<description>If Eli is anything like my kids he is going to get even more attracted by this iPad than by the laptop :-) </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.gabrielweinberg.com/blog/2010/01/my-apple-tablet-islate-use-case-baby-following.html#IDComment54286591</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Mendelson&#039;s Musings : Three things NOT to do when you are pitching me</title>
<link>http://www.jasonmendelson.com/wp/archives/2009/12/three-things-not-to-do-when-you-are-pitching-me.php#IDComment47728926</link>
<description>About your point #3, I believe in &amp;quot;strong convictions, weakly held&amp;quot;, the notion that you speak as if you were right but you listen as if you were wrong. Being able to articulate why you think you&amp;#039;re right is not in opposition to being open to the possiibility that you might be wrong.... is this something you would find worthy of respect as an investor? </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 02:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.jasonmendelson.com/wp/archives/2009/12/three-things-not-to-do-when-you-are-pitching-me.php#IDComment47728926</guid>
</item><item>
<title>http://www.jeffnolan.com/blog/ : San Francisco, The Worst-Run Big City in the U.S.</title>
<link>http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2009/12/16/san-francisco-the-worst-run-big-city-in-the-u-s/#IDComment47500002</link>
<description>BTW, lots of interesting &lt;a href=&quot;&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;comments on why SF is poorly run&lt;/a&gt; at Hacker News </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 01:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2009/12/16/san-francisco-the-worst-run-big-city-in-the-u-s/#IDComment47500002</guid>
</item><item>
<title>http://www.jeffnolan.com/blog/ : San Francisco, The Worst-Run Big City in the U.S.</title>
<link>http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2009/12/16/san-francisco-the-worst-run-big-city-in-the-u-s/#IDComment47497102</link>
<description>Jeff, I agree with the basic fact of how poorly run SF is, but the key question is why?? What makes it specially suited to mismanagement?   </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 00:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2009/12/16/san-francisco-the-worst-run-big-city-in-the-u-s/#IDComment47497102</guid>
</item><item>
<title>http://www.jeffnolan.com/blog/ : Analyst Reports are Still 1.0</title>
<link>http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2009/12/15/analyst-reports-are-still-10/#IDComment47308925</link>
<description>I see these kinds of reports exceedingly useful in defining the boundaries of convention and in providing a neatly defined conceptual target for being contrarian... it&amp;#039;s just a matter of looking at it in the right way. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 23:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2009/12/15/analyst-reports-are-still-10/#IDComment47308925</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Beltway Startups : AOL is Leaner</title>
<link>http://www.beltwaystartups.com/2009/12/aol-is-leaner/#IDComment46722044</link>
<description>AOL has a sizable challenge ahead. A company that once was worth $350B is now a mere $2.5B, and they&amp;#039;re going against giants with a lot more momentum. AOL still has 100M users and some good properties, but the expectations are so high that nothing short of perfection will be taken as a failure by their naysayers.  It was interesting to see &lt;a href=&quot;http:\/\/www.businessinsider.com\/jason-calacanis-i-plan-on-buying-250000-worth-of-aol-stock-2009-11&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Jason Calcanis come out with a strong endorsement of AOL&lt;/a&gt;, though. This may be a case where industry insiders and visionaries are seeing a compelling business with much strength and a solid business model and observers are just not clued in. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 04:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.beltwaystartups.com/2009/12/aol-is-leaner/#IDComment46722044</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>