estabian - well put - what a waste of internet space. No one is proposing such a theory...you're blowing real facts into oblivion by making a joke out of 3000 lives lost. If you really cared about those lives and not your own innocence, you would want a REAL investigation...

ha - I would LOVE to see that video...assuming you're NOT talking about the 3 frames of images they gave us with a cloud of dust and then an explosion. If you have one of the 7 CIA confiscated films that show video of the plane, I would be truly honored to see it...let me know...

Ha - such a man would not present a theory - even as a joke about Bush being interested in the building when he was 23 and that having something to do with 2001. That is just ludicrous - even to bring up as a talking point...

Most people who think they are smart, are average.

Well, at least they found a passport form one of the terrorists in the rubble...you know the same fire that was so hot that it melted the building to where it collapsed - yeah, that fire preserved one of the paper passports so that we could be sure that it was definitely those guys...

Thanks goodness for fire retardant paper, especially when your steel isn't....

Mike - thank you.

And the rigged building theory is loose, but it is really interesting. I don't personally believe they could get away with that for every building, but you are correct when you say, something had to have caused these buildings to fall straight down...and it wasn't jet fuel. The pancake theory doesn't work when the dust cleared and there were no stacked floors! Ha...I guess some people get their pancakes and scrambled eggs mixed up...because my pancake stack has never looked like a huge pile of rubble...

Um...............YES.

It matters a LOT. You honestly believe that if we ourselves were somehow involved in this that it wouldn't matter? That's crazy talk!

Ha - once again, you're missing the point...there are more than two options:

1) 9.11 was an evil government conspiracy OR
2) The official story is true

That's the problem with arguing about this - many people think these are the ONLY two options when in reality there could be one million options - but who knows? There STILL has been a LEGIT, NO BIAS, WELL-FUNDED analysis of the events of that day and sadly - we may never know...

It breaks my heart...

P.s. I don't think the health care option is safe either so I guess I'm an odd ball :)

GodFear, outside of the "spoken word" flow to your post, you have some great stuff - thanks for being one of the sane people left...

For a decade, these "terrorists" have strapped bombs to themselves and taken out the people standing around them, and those same people orchestrated this whole day? It's hard to believe...

Goodness sakes - is there anyone left in the world that appreciates logic? Not petty ignorance and blind trust, but logic.

First and foremost - Dennis, you picked Jesse, clearly to make him look as stupid as possible and you phrased the interview like that. If you are TRULY interested in finding out legitimate, SCIENTIFIC information about 9.11, interview someone like Richard Gage from ae911truth.org - not a television host. The Bush, being a 23-year-old and saying something to the builders is just such nonsense that it's even more ridiculous than anything else that was said.

Second...folks, please, I'm an American - you're an American. Do you genuinely want to know what happened on 9/11? More money was spent investigating the Monica Lewinsky scandal than was spent during the investigation by the 9/11 commission...the biggest crime, the only full "attack" on contiguous state soil and the book stops when the last planes falls and says nothing about the building collapses? Doesn't that just make you a little confused? President Bush would not testify to the commission under oath and demanded to have Dick Cheney with him (which they eventually allowed) for his questioning...again, honestly, since we're talking logic - what in the world was THAT all about? Same story for Pres. Clinton and Al Gore (would not testify under oath).

Again, the greatest crime on American soil (other than millions of American Indians and slaves being killed numerically) and this is the kind of shotty investigation we openly except?

The correct question is not YET "who" did it, but the correct question is what REALLY happened - since the current theory does not hold up...