<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/645776</link>
		<description>Comments by eRtwngr</description>
<item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Michael Reagan Reacts To Breitbart&#039;s Death</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/michael-reagan-reacts-to-breitbarts-death/#IDComment305875587</link>
<description>Comforted to see the long list of contributors on his websites and the outpouring of support for his cause all over cyberspace. Regarding the left and especially the corrupt media, if you see something, tweet something or post something. Don&amp;#039;t let the bastards win. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Mar 2012 01:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/michael-reagan-reacts-to-breitbarts-death/#IDComment305875587</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Conservative publisher Breitbart dies in LA at 43</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9T7RKD05&show_article=1#IDComment305639423</link>
<description>He would have loved the distorted and nonsensical article by AP.   &amp;quot;The videos show ACORN staffers offering advice on taxes and other issues to actors posing as a prostitute and pimp.&amp;quot;  Really? What&amp;#039;s controversial about that? Why&amp;#039;d they lose their funding? Maybe AP doesn&amp;#039;t know. Too hard to track down for the old media giant I guess. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 1 Mar 2012 18:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9T7RKD05&show_article=1#IDComment305639423</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Family Sues To Have ‘Under God’ Removed From Pledge</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/atheists-less-patriotic-family-sues-to-have-under-god-removed-from-pledge/#IDComment293886397</link>
<description>Well they succeeded in getting their 15 minutes of infamy. I think I&amp;#039;ll sue to have mustard removed from hotdogs. Maybe I can get in the news. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 12:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/atheists-less-patriotic-family-sues-to-have-under-god-removed-from-pledge/#IDComment293886397</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Obama Outflanks Republicans On Payroll Tax Cut</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/bshapiro/2012/02/15/obama-outflanks-republicans-on-payroll-tax-cut/#IDComment293441104</link>
<description>What you are calling a payroll &amp;quot;tax&amp;quot; isn&amp;#039;t a tax at all as you know. It&amp;#039;s your contribution to your own retirement account. So while both parties are claiming the looming social security deficit is an economic destroyer, they go about making it worse. What for? People who have a job can pay in. And with so many out of work the problem is even greater. Why are the pols trying to kill social security and the economy even faster? And why did the GOP fall for it? Are these people serious? About anything? </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 22:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/bshapiro/2012/02/15/obama-outflanks-republicans-on-payroll-tax-cut/#IDComment293441104</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Romney intensifies fight for social conservatives</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SOVN903&show_article=1#IDComment287022607</link>
<description>As a conservative living in Massachusetts I can attest that Mitt Romney is no conservative. From government mandated health insurance to tax policy to forcing Catholic hospitals to provide abortion inducing drugs to single handedly enacting gay marriage by decree, Romney was every bit as radically liberal as Barack Obama. He does a good job of running from his record. But if you really want to know all you have to do is look. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Feb 2012 12:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SOVN903&show_article=1#IDComment287022607</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : US seeks \&#039;clarification\&#039; on Egypt activist trials</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.a9687a877c9c8009cdaf09890cddba68.01&amp;show_article=1#IDComment285379424</link>
<description>I real president would park an aircraft carrier battle group between the Nile and the Suez canal and provide instructions to the Egyptians on where to safely drop our citizens off. Barack OCarter instead will say please and possibly threaten to &amp;quot;cut off aid&amp;quot; which should scare these people to no end. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 6 Feb 2012 14:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.a9687a877c9c8009cdaf09890cddba68.01&amp;show_article=1#IDComment285379424</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Obama reflects on significance of Roe v. Wade case</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SE51L01&show_article=1#IDComment271532054</link>
<description>Subsidizing Planned Parenhtood and requiring contraceptive coverage including abortifacients is not being neutral nor is it leaving private decisions up to individuals. Government is advocating for population control. It is one of many policies of failure the liberals espouse. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 21:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SE51L01&show_article=1#IDComment271532054</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Feds: Religious employers must cover the pill</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SCSNNO0&show_article=1#IDComment270563261</link>
<description>Isn&amp;#039;t the government by its funding birth control advocating ather than remaining neutral? We all pay for it even if it violates our conscience and belief system. So they are &amp;quot;dictating&amp;quot; to one group despite your warped logic. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 16:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SCSNNO0&show_article=1#IDComment270563261</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Feds: Religious employers must cover the pill</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SCSNNO0&show_article=1#IDComment270561906</link>
<description>The liberal minded quasi Catholics who supported Obama are to blame for this. By their capitulation to his radical secularism they signaled he could act with impunity. Sister Keenan&amp;#039;s protest sounds empty. She was warned by the Bishops and defied them anyway. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 16:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SCSNNO0&show_article=1#IDComment270561906</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : AP source: ABC interviewed Gingrich ex-wife</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SBN46O0&show_article=1#IDComment268215319</link>
<description>He does walk a tightrope. No question about that. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 01:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SBN46O0&show_article=1#IDComment268215319</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Sen. Lugar: Tea Party Candidates Killed Chances For Senate Majority</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/sen-lugar-tea-party-candidates-killed-chances-for-senate-majority/#IDComment248826711</link>
<description>From reading the previous comments I&amp;#039;d say Lugar would have better off keeping a lower profile. If the Tea Party was able to get a Republican elected in Ted Kennedy&amp;#039;s Senate seat, replacing Lugar isn&amp;#039;t even heavy lifting. His own words make for a splendid mailer. Does this clown really believe it means more to folks to maintain a phony GOP majority than to actually stand for something? Has he not read that the biggest political party is now &amp;quot;unenrolled&amp;quot;? We cannot govern with career aristocratic politicians like Lugar getting rich off the gullible. Goodbye, Dick. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 22:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/sen-lugar-tea-party-candidates-killed-chances-for-senate-majority/#IDComment248826711</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : White House hopeful Gingrich rips rivals over attacks</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.9d58c31cd5bdcb7896237b12cacad3c9.251&amp;show_article=1#IDComment242899947</link>
<description>Leave it to this group to figures out a way to improve Obama&amp;#039;s favorable rating. The only person to benefit from their attacks has been Obama. Put your own policies and positions forward, my friends, and let the rest of us tear into the facts. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 21:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.9d58c31cd5bdcb7896237b12cacad3c9.251&amp;show_article=1#IDComment242899947</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : A Time for Choosing: Rick Perry for President</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/mikeflynn/2011/12/19/393640/#IDComment242185582</link>
<description>I agree that watching Perry debate brings back the stomach tightening moments of the Reagan debates, where you held your breath hoping he could complete a thought, but that&amp;#039;s not decisive for me. To elect a Texan again means to sacrifice the immigration issue. Their perspective is different because they are on the border and have learned to coexist with Mexico and the mass of refugees from the drug wars. I&amp;#039;m more concerned about globalism and the trans national highway. But I&amp;#039;d still give him a chance over Romney and Gingrich. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 01:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/mikeflynn/2011/12/19/393640/#IDComment242185582</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Census shows 1 in 2 people are poor or low-income</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9RLAN1O2&show_article=1#IDComment239119129</link>
<description>Things are bad by American standards but this statistic is pure baloney. Poverty? Really? Visit Calcutta and tell me about &amp;quot;poverty&amp;quot; in the US. With Congress renewing unemployment  benefits to around 2 years we have defacto welfare that is the envy of the third world. Folks living in poverty in America manage to do so while watching large flat screen TVs and texting on their iPhones while gaining weight into obesity. The government classifies this as poverty to try and enslave even more into this welfare dependency. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 12:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9RLAN1O2&show_article=1#IDComment239119129</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : &#039;Occupation&#039; Is Not &#039;Speech&#039;: #OccupyBoston, #OccupyDenver Lose in Court</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/jpollak/2011/12/07/occupation-is-not-speech-occupyboston-occupydenver-lose-in-court/#IDComment234433096</link>
<description>It&amp;#039;s a tough spot for a liberal judge in Boston. On the one hand you have nostalgia for the 60&amp;#039;s style protesters. And on the other you have the Rose Kennedy Greenway trustees that operates the park the occupies are peeng all over. She tried to give them some leeway hoping they&amp;#039;d eventually get bored or have final exams and leave but they clung to their new homes with gusto. So eventually the good judge was forced to dust off those old law books on the shelf and actually rule on the written law as distasteful as that is. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 8 Dec 2011 01:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/jpollak/2011/12/07/occupation-is-not-speech-occupyboston-occupydenver-lose-in-court/#IDComment234433096</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Is the STOCK Act a Toothless Paper Tiger?</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/whall/2011/12/02/is-the-stock-act-a-toothless-paper-tiger/#IDComment232195820</link>
<description>It&amp;#039;s pretty obvious both Pelosi and Boehner are completely compromised by this issue and want it to go away. That&amp;#039;s what passes for leadership in today&amp;#039;s Congress. No wonder the whole system is so corrupt. Close these loopholes and these slime balls  </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 3 Dec 2011 16:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/whall/2011/12/02/is-the-stock-act-a-toothless-paper-tiger/#IDComment232195820</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : SuperCommittee Announces Failure to Reach Deal</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/11/21/supercommittee-announces-failure-to-reach-deal/#IDComment225433158</link>
<description>These guys and gals were as likely to come out of this with a deal as they would be to come out of a locked room and announce an agreement on abortion. Taxes and social issues are what they use to scare us into contributing to their campaigns and they thrive on division.  Agreements are bad for fundraising and &amp;quot;the Groups&amp;quot; don&amp;#039;t like them. The one thing they wake up in full agreement about each day is to make no deals that harm cash flow. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 01:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/11/21/supercommittee-announces-failure-to-reach-deal/#IDComment225433158</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Is There a Conservative Case for Mitt Romney?</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/jpollak/2011/11/21/is-there-a-conservative-case-for-mitt-romney/#IDComment225430516</link>
<description>It&amp;#039;s difficult for this Massachusetts resident to envision Mitt Romney leading the charge against Obamacare. He practically invented it! While my premiums have had double digit increases every year since Romneycare was passed and access has dwindled except for illegal residents who seem to get to the front of the line, the rest of the country is now resting hope that Romney won&amp;#039;t do to them what he proudly did to us? And as for the religious conscience objection, Romney managed to put Catholic Charities out of the adoption business years before Obama and Sebelius ever thought of it. Conservative? Don&amp;#039;t make me choke on my coffee. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 01:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/jpollak/2011/11/21/is-there-a-conservative-case-for-mitt-romney/#IDComment225430516</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Congressman Gowdy (R-SC): &#039;We&#039;re Going To Find Out&#039; How To Make Insider Trading Illegal</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/congressman-gowdy-r-sc-were-going-to-find-out-how-to-make-insider-trading-illegal/#IDComment224845211</link>
<description>The US is now more corrupt than any 3rd world country. We have politicians getting rich off stock deals from information not available to the general public. We have billions of taxpayer dollars going to phony businesses that funnel it back to political parties campaigns. It is institutionalized corruption and it has consumed both parties. The only way out is to remove all the offenders one way or another, preferably in chains. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 18:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/congressman-gowdy-r-sc-were-going-to-find-out-how-to-make-insider-trading-illegal/#IDComment224845211</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : &#039;60 Minutes&#039; Ambushes... Nancy Pelosi?</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/60-minutes-ambushes-nancy-pelosi/#IDComment216445584</link>
<description>Not sure what she doesn&amp;#039;t get. She passed a bill regarding credit card holders while a credit card company was bribing her. So what&amp;#039;s really in the bill? What could have been in the bill that wasn&amp;#039;t?   But it&amp;#039;s easy to go after Pelosi. My gosh I&amp;#039;m surprised her nose didn&amp;#039;t fall off while she was talking. But she&amp;#039;s not much different than the rest in both parties. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 3 Nov 2011 20:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/60-minutes-ambushes-nancy-pelosi/#IDComment216445584</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>