<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/2979</link>
		<description>Comments by Rahul Pathak</description>
<item>
<title>LookStat - Official Blog : Studying Ads Can Help You Make More Money in Microstock</title>
<link>http://blog.lookstat.com/2011/04/18/studying-ads-can-help-you-make-more-money-in-microstock/#IDComment155269568</link>
<description>Glad you liked the post. Makes perfect sense to pay attention to how images are being used. Thanks for commenting.  Rahul </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 16:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.lookstat.com/2011/04/18/studying-ads-can-help-you-make-more-money-in-microstock/#IDComment155269568</guid>
</item><item>
<title>LookStat - Official Blog : Lifestyle Shoot Planning: Top 10 USA Leisure Activities from 2001-2009</title>
<link>http://blog.lookstat.com/2011/04/01/lifestyle-shoot-planning-top-10-usa-leisure-activities-from-2001-2009/#IDComment139464441</link>
<description>Wow. That is impressive. Very cool. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 2 Apr 2011 23:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.lookstat.com/2011/04/01/lifestyle-shoot-planning-top-10-usa-leisure-activities-from-2001-2009/#IDComment139464441</guid>
</item><item>
<title>LookStat - Official Blog : Lifestyle Shoot Planning: Top 10 USA Leisure Activities from 2001-2009</title>
<link>http://blog.lookstat.com/2011/04/01/lifestyle-shoot-planning-top-10-usa-leisure-activities-from-2001-2009/#IDComment139445184</link>
<description>Thanks for sharing that Isaac. Does that hold true year round or is it more seasonal? (creating a hiking collection could tell you that.) </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 2 Apr 2011 21:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.lookstat.com/2011/04/01/lifestyle-shoot-planning-top-10-usa-leisure-activities-from-2001-2009/#IDComment139445184</guid>
</item><item>
<title>LookStat - Official Blog : iStock Analysis - Portfolio Size vs. Downloads per Image</title>
<link>http://blog.lookstat.com/2011/03/10/istock-analysis-portfolio-size-vs-downloads-per-image/#IDComment133932700</link>
<description>Hi Ori,    You&amp;#039;re right about rate mattering. However in this case, I&amp;#039;m looking at total downloads and total images over that timeframe. I think it&amp;#039;s interesting that the ratios of the totals are what they are.  Naturally, correlation and causation are not the same, and there are many individual factors that would affect a particular person&amp;#039;s outcome.  You&amp;#039;re 100% correct that age of image is a factor and the absence of time data hides an important dimension. Unfortunately, true cohort analysis isn&amp;#039;t possible with the data set I used.   Rahul </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 21:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.lookstat.com/2011/03/10/istock-analysis-portfolio-size-vs-downloads-per-image/#IDComment133932700</guid>
</item><item>
<title>LookStat - Official Blog : iStock Contributor Analysis - Rank versus Years Contributing</title>
<link>http://blog.lookstat.com/2011/02/22/istock-contributor-analysis-rank-versus-years-contributing/#IDComment130707305</link>
<description>Hi Holgs,  I calculated ranking based on annual DLs (Total/Years contributing) and there isn&amp;#039;t a lot of aggregate change. Only 18 people dropped out of the Top 100 and they moved into the 100-200 ranking band.  I&amp;#039;ll post more details on that next week.  Rahul </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 23:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.lookstat.com/2011/02/22/istock-contributor-analysis-rank-versus-years-contributing/#IDComment130707305</guid>
</item><item>
<title>LookStat - Official Blog : iStock Contributor Analysis - Rank versus Years Contributing</title>
<link>http://blog.lookstat.com/2011/02/22/istock-contributor-analysis-rank-versus-years-contributing/#IDComment130157837</link>
<description>Holgs: I completely agree that download velocity is key. However, I think the data still supports that idea that years of experience are not the driving factor behind exceptional performance. I think your own analysis supports that point too.  I&amp;#039;ll post with an analysis of tenure vs. velocity. That will be interesting. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 20:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.lookstat.com/2011/02/22/istock-contributor-analysis-rank-versus-years-contributing/#IDComment130157837</guid>
</item><item>
<title>LookStat - Official Blog : iStock Contributor Analysis - Rank versus Years Contributing</title>
<link>http://blog.lookstat.com/2011/02/22/istock-contributor-analysis-rank-versus-years-contributing/#IDComment130137715</link>
<description>My pleasure, Chris. Good luck and come see us when you dive back in! </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 18:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.lookstat.com/2011/02/22/istock-contributor-analysis-rank-versus-years-contributing/#IDComment130137715</guid>
</item><item>
<title>LookStat - Official Blog : iStock Contributor Analysis - Rank versus Years Contributing</title>
<link>http://blog.lookstat.com/2011/02/22/istock-contributor-analysis-rank-versus-years-contributing/#IDComment130012565</link>
<description>Thanks for the kind words, Lee. I was quite surprised at what dropped out when playing with the data. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 05:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.lookstat.com/2011/02/22/istock-contributor-analysis-rank-versus-years-contributing/#IDComment130012565</guid>
</item><item>
<title>LookStat - Official Blog : iStock Best Match Search Results: Top 25 Contributors by Share of Results</title>
<link>http://blog.lookstat.com/2011/01/13/top-25-contributors-by-search-share/#IDComment122827028</link>
<description>Absolutely - check out my latest post:    &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.lookstat.com/2011/01/20/istock-search-analysis-4x-as-many-exclusive-vs-non-exclusive-images-in-bm/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://blog.lookstat.com/2011/01/20/istock-search...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 19:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.lookstat.com/2011/01/13/top-25-contributors-by-search-share/#IDComment122827028</guid>
</item><item>
<title>LookStat - Official Blog : iStock Search Analysis - 4x as many exclusive vs. non-exclusive images</title>
<link>http://blog.lookstat.com/2011/01/20/istock-search-analysis-4x-as-many-exclusive-vs-non-exclusive-images-in-bm/#IDComment122644965</link>
<description>Hi Ori,  You\\\&#039;re right, the overall population is important, but my point is still valid. For a buyer searching using best match, they will see 4x the number of exclusive images on average. That is still significant.  Rahul </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 03:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.lookstat.com/2011/01/20/istock-search-analysis-4x-as-many-exclusive-vs-non-exclusive-images-in-bm/#IDComment122644965</guid>
</item><item>
<title>LookStat - Official Blog : iStock Search Analysis - 4x as many exclusive vs. non-exclusive images</title>
<link>http://blog.lookstat.com/2011/01/20/istock-search-analysis-4x-as-many-exclusive-vs-non-exclusive-images-in-bm/#IDComment122618734</link>
<description>Thanks Robert. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 00:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.lookstat.com/2011/01/20/istock-search-analysis-4x-as-many-exclusive-vs-non-exclusive-images-in-bm/#IDComment122618734</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Boulder Barn : You Actually CAN Sell Landscape Photography on Microstock!!</title>
<link>http://boulderbarn.com/2011/01/19/you-actually-can-sell-landscape-photography-on-microstock/#IDComment122390465</link>
<description>Great post, Ben.  Rahul CEO &amp;amp; Founder, LookStat</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 00:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://boulderbarn.com/2011/01/19/you-actually-can-sell-landscape-photography-on-microstock/#IDComment122390465</guid>
</item><item>
<title>LookStat - Official Blog : iStock Best Match Search Results: Analysis of lifestyle, medical, and business searches</title>
<link>http://blog.lookstat.com/2011/01/10/istock-best-match-search-results-analysis-of-lifestyle-medical-and-business-searches/#IDComment120742196</link>
<description>Great points on this. I plan to make this analysis ongoing. DLs/month does make a lot of sense but is trickier to get for public search results. However, we can do it for our customers.  When did you become exclusive at iStock? How has the experience been for you? </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 18:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.lookstat.com/2011/01/10/istock-best-match-search-results-analysis-of-lifestyle-medical-and-business-searches/#IDComment120742196</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Starting Up by Rahul Pathak : The 2nd Law of PR...</title>
<link>http://www.rp0229.com/blog/2010/03/08/the-2nd-law-of-pr/#IDComment107232385</link>
<description>Thanks for sharing your thoughts, Matt. The only thing to add (and you should lead with it) is:  &amp;quot;0. Here&amp;#039;s what&amp;#039;s in it for you&amp;quot;  You should also check out:   &lt;a href=&quot;http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2010/10/ideas-spread-when.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2010/10/i...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Nov 2010 21:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.rp0229.com/blog/2010/03/08/the-2nd-law-of-pr/#IDComment107232385</guid>
</item><item>
<title>LookStat - Official Blog : How To Make a Million Dollars in Microstock</title>
<link>http://blog.lookstat.com/2010/10/14/how-to-make-a-million-dollars-in-microstock-2/#IDComment106045246</link>
<description>Hi Paul,  These numbers just speak to revenues and not costs. The post &amp;amp; calculator were designed to show the relationship between RPI, Uploads &amp;amp; revenues. Specific situations will be different.  Rahul </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 20:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.lookstat.com/2010/10/14/how-to-make-a-million-dollars-in-microstock-2/#IDComment106045246</guid>
</item><item>
<title>TechCrunch : Survey Monkey Buys Precision Polling After Seeing It On TechCrunch</title>
<link>http://techcrunch.com/2010/06/21/survey-monkey-buys-precision-polling-after-seeing-it-on-techcrunch/#IDComment81287163</link>
<description>Gaurav and Charles rock - congrats guys. I&amp;#039;m very happy for both of you and best of luck in the next phase of your adventures.  Rahul </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 21:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://techcrunch.com/2010/06/21/survey-monkey-buys-precision-polling-after-seeing-it-on-techcrunch/#IDComment81287163</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Feld Thoughts : A Month of Mac</title>
<link>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2010/06/a-month-of-mac.html#IDComment81263448</link>
<description>i use Adium for multi-client IM - &lt;a href=&quot;http://adium.im/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://adium.im/&lt;/a&gt; apple map via IMAP for all Google Mail/Calendar syncing apple ical -&amp;gt; google -&amp;gt; iphone for over the air calendar sync parallels for when you need windows  I made the switch 3 years ago and won&amp;#039;t go back  good luck! </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 18:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2010/06/a-month-of-mac.html#IDComment81263448</guid>
</item><item>
<title>LookStat - Official Blog : Microstock Stats - Medical Images &amp; Formats</title>
<link>http://blog.lookstat.com/2010/05/27/microstock-stats-medical-images-formats/#IDComment77560066</link>
<description>I never thought that I&amp;#039;d have to watch Grey&amp;#039;s Anatomy to provide useful analytics on medical stock imagery.... </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 23:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.lookstat.com/2010/05/27/microstock-stats-medical-images-formats/#IDComment77560066</guid>
</item><item>
<title>LookStat - Official Blog : Microstock Stats - Medical Images &amp; Formats</title>
<link>http://blog.lookstat.com/2010/05/27/microstock-stats-medical-images-formats/#IDComment77437763</link>
<description>Terrific comments! The depth at which you\\\&#039;re thinking about this is phenomenal to see. Thanks for sharing your insight!  Rahul </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 08:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.lookstat.com/2010/05/27/microstock-stats-medical-images-formats/#IDComment77437763</guid>
</item><item>
<title>LookStat - Official Blog : Microstock Stats - Medical Images &amp; Formats</title>
<link>http://blog.lookstat.com/2010/05/27/microstock-stats-medical-images-formats/#IDComment77434038</link>
<description>Hi Ellen,  Great points &amp;amp; I\\\&#039;ll see what I can do. I was planning on looking at doctor/patient ratio but age/gender of professionals is interesting too.  Rahul </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 07:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.lookstat.com/2010/05/27/microstock-stats-medical-images-formats/#IDComment77434038</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>