roguemale613

roguemale613

97p

68 comments posted · 1 followers · following 0

10 years ago @ Commentary Magazine - Iraq's Newest Insurgency · 0 replies · +2 points

It's A Pity They Can't Both Lose Redux.

10 years ago @ Commentary Magazine - The Stunning Public Sh... · 1 reply · +1 points

Perhaps this will help: http://www.steynonline.com/5473/death-to-freedom

'In Canada, the law denies "the right to say his piece" to the likes of Bill Whatcott, a man who believes that homosexuals are sinners and in need of God's grace and forgiveness, but it has no objection to those who think homosexuals are evil and should be put to death. Mr. Philips need never fear the scrutiny of the "human rights" commission, or the cost of ten-year legal battles.

'No homosexual needs the state's protection from Bill Whatcott. But all of us need protection from nitwit jurists blithely sacrificing core Western liberties to ideological compliance. It's not about Left vs. Right, gay vs. straight, religious vs. secular; it's about free vs. unfree. And on that most profound question, Canada's supreme court is on the wrong side. Nuts to them.'

10 years ago @ Commentary Magazine - The Stunning Public Sh... · 0 replies · +1 points

"I have never heard of Mark Steyn"

Then you really don't know what you're talking about re: "hate crime" persecution in Canada.

11 years ago @ Commentary Magazine - Trump, Malkin, and Dum... · 2 replies · +5 points

I find Wehner's posts increasingly to resemble Dean Acheson's description of Canada, "the stern daughter of the voice of God."

11 years ago @ Commentary Magazine - Rush Limbaugh and Me · 0 replies · +6 points

What part of "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms" do you not understand? It's the right of the people, not the militia, to keep and bear arms. No one reads "people" in the 1st, 4th, 9th and 10th amendments (nor its singular form "person" in the 5th), to mean only members of the militia. "People" in the 2nd means the exact same thing as in the other amendments, no more and no less. Moreover, none of the elements of the Bill of Rights constrain or circumscribe individual rights; they only constrain and circumscribe the power of the government relative to the people and the states.

11 years ago @ Commentary Magazine - Rand Paul’s Moment o... · 0 replies · +3 points

(Principle + Guts) * Adroitness = Defeat for Bathhouse Barry.

11 years ago @ Commentary Magazine - Humanitarian Aid to Sy... · 0 replies · +2 points

To govern is to choose. Bathhouse Barry has chosen Assad. The "non-lethal aid" is merely intended to preserve some remaining sheen from that laughable Peace Prize thingie he got.

11 years ago @ Commentary Magazine - What the French and Sa... · 0 replies · +7 points

"whatever the arguments at the time, they recognized that when push came to shove, the United States had their back. No longer."

That lesson should have been learned years ago; one only had to ask the Hondurans and the Poles. And just about every other real traditional ally of the U.S.

11 years ago @ Commentary Magazine - Losing Afghanistan · 0 replies · +5 points

"Under Obama, we have become like a cat, swatting a string and never bothering to look at who is dangling it."

What do you mean "we"? Bathhouse Barry owns this fiasco in toto.

11 years ago @ Commentary Magazine - The Oscars, the Obamas... · 1 reply · +3 points

It was all over when the Fat Lady sang...