<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/343307</link>
		<description>Comments by rmacdona</description>
<item>
<title>davidrothman.net : Screencast: Evernote as a Medical Student\&#039;s Peripheral Brain</title>
<link>http://davidrothman.net/2009/03/02/screencast-evernote-as-a-medical-students-peripheral-brain/#IDComment16402285</link>
<description>This is a great comment and something I have discussed locally with my librarian and looked into a bit. Truly the best way to provide articles to team members is by sending a link to the article on a publisher&amp;#039;s website. This eliminates any concerns vis-a-vis licensing etc.  Practically speaking however all the articles I share are shared between colleagues at the same institution which purchases access to these articles.  Sharing articles to a broader anonymous Internet audience would be dubious. In the spirit of providing excellent patient care I have virtually no personal issues with sharing papers with my colleagues -provided we are working at the same institution. Additionally I feel it is important to password protect these materials. I understand that this functionality will be available soon. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Mar 2009 20:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://davidrothman.net/2009/03/02/screencast-evernote-as-a-medical-students-peripheral-brain/#IDComment16402285</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>