en-us https://www.intensedebate.com/users/733325 Comments by rizwanreza http://www.engineyard.com/blog/2010/the-lowdown-on-routes-in-rails-3/#IDComment69434453 After setting up your redirect rules either in a middleware or in Apache, you can use scope as shown above and write all routes inside the block. Wed, 21 Apr 2010 21:05:45 +0000 http://www.engineyard.com/blog/2010/the-lowdown-on-routes-in-rails-3/#IDComment69434453 http://www.engineyard.com/blog/2010/the-lowdown-on-routes-in-rails-3/#IDComment68397246 You&#039;re right, my bad! :) I meant this: redirect(&quot;http://github.com/rails.atom&quot;) do # routes here end This is not supported, last I checked. Thanks! Fri, 16 Apr 2010 16:59:10 +0000 http://www.engineyard.com/blog/2010/the-lowdown-on-routes-in-rails-3/#IDComment68397246 http://www.engineyard.com/blog/2010/the-lowdown-on-routes-in-rails-3/#IDComment68397043 My point was in regards to the pervasive blocks that the new DSL promotes. Can you point out the typos? Thanks! Fri, 16 Apr 2010 16:57:26 +0000 http://www.engineyard.com/blog/2010/the-lowdown-on-routes-in-rails-3/#IDComment68397043 http://www.engineyard.com/blog/2010/the-lowdown-on-routes-in-rails-3/#IDComment68396897 You are right but it still depends on the scenario. Fri, 16 Apr 2010 16:56:12 +0000 http://www.engineyard.com/blog/2010/the-lowdown-on-routes-in-rails-3/#IDComment68396897 http://www.engineyard.com/blog/2010/the-lowdown-on-routes-in-rails-3/#IDComment65544656 Well, that can be done easily with new Routes: match /products/show(/:type)&#039; =&gt; &#039;products#show&#039; # Available as params[:type] match /assets/show(/:type)&#039; =&gt; &#039;products#show&#039; If you&#039;d rather not allow the user to mention the type in the URL: match /products/show&#039; =&gt; &#039;products#show&#039;, :type =&gt; &#039;simple&#039; # Available as params[:type] match /assets/show&#039; =&gt; &#039;products#show&#039;, :type =&gt; &#039;complex&#039; Fri, 2 Apr 2010 12:25:47 +0000 http://www.engineyard.com/blog/2010/the-lowdown-on-routes-in-rails-3/#IDComment65544656 http://www.engineyard.com/blog/2010/the-lowdown-on-routes-in-rails-3/#IDComment65333366 From the looks of it, it will still require a plugin to support such functionality. Thu, 1 Apr 2010 22:20:54 +0000 http://www.engineyard.com/blog/2010/the-lowdown-on-routes-in-rails-3/#IDComment65333366 http://www.engineyard.com/blog/2010/the-lowdown-on-routes-in-rails-3/#IDComment65333039 I agree, we&#039;ll see what we can do about that. Thu, 1 Apr 2010 22:19:53 +0000 http://www.engineyard.com/blog/2010/the-lowdown-on-routes-in-rails-3/#IDComment65333039 http://www.engineyard.com/blog/2010/the-lowdown-on-routes-in-rails-3/#IDComment64978085 See this: <a href="http://github.com/rails/rails/commit/fef7a77386b0e738f3b5c25fd9ab0350a6e56d6c" target="_blank">http://github.com/rails/rails/commit/fef7a77386b0...</a> I will work through an example and add it to the article. Thanks. Wed, 31 Mar 2010 08:13:45 +0000 http://www.engineyard.com/blog/2010/the-lowdown-on-routes-in-rails-3/#IDComment64978085 http://www.engineyard.com/blog/2010/the-lowdown-on-routes-in-rails-3/#IDComment64977513 The subdomains method was added recently in this commit: <a href="http://github.com/rails/rails/commit/fef7a77386b0e738f3b5c25fd9ab0350a6e56d6c" target="_blank">http://github.com/rails/rails/commit/fef7a77386b0...</a> Wed, 31 Mar 2010 08:07:04 +0000 http://www.engineyard.com/blog/2010/the-lowdown-on-routes-in-rails-3/#IDComment64977513 http://www.engineyard.com/blog/2010/the-lowdown-on-routes-in-rails-3/#IDComment64977340 No, the router doesn&#039;t surround Regular Expressions with implicit anchors right now. Wed, 31 Mar 2010 08:05:19 +0000 http://www.engineyard.com/blog/2010/the-lowdown-on-routes-in-rails-3/#IDComment64977340 http://www.engineyard.com/blog/2010/the-lowdown-on-routes-in-rails-3/#IDComment64893357 Shallow routes haven&#039;t been implemented yet. We&#039;re working on that here: <a href="https://rails.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8994/tickets/3765" target="_blank">https://rails.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8994/tic...</a> Thanks. Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:32:20 +0000 http://www.engineyard.com/blog/2010/the-lowdown-on-routes-in-rails-3/#IDComment64893357