<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/806582</link>
		<description>Comments by richter1</description>
<item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Daily Gut: Why You Are Worse Than Hitler</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggutfeld/2010/02/25/daily-gut-why-you-are-worse-than-hitler/#IDComment58800684</link>
<description>Teabaggers themselves used that name until they became aware of the double entendre.  I do not feel the need to cover up for their woefully inadequate learning curve.  Nor will I sully the sacred memory of the Boston Tea Party by associating them with the collection of bigots, bullies, and latter-day Tories who are trying to hijack that good name. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggutfeld/2010/02/25/daily-gut-why-you-are-worse-than-hitler/#IDComment58800684</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Daily Gut: Why You Are Worse Than Hitler</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggutfeld/2010/02/25/daily-gut-why-you-are-worse-than-hitler/#IDComment58799677</link>
<description>Of all of Jonah Goldberg&amp;#039;s burblings, this is far and away the most childish. The old East Germany&amp;#039;s official name was the German DEMOCRATIC Republic.  Today&amp;#039;s China calls itself the PEOPLE&amp;#039;S Republic.  I do not share your touching but rather misguided faith in the honesty of thugs. I&amp;#039;m just saying... </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggutfeld/2010/02/25/daily-gut-why-you-are-worse-than-hitler/#IDComment58799677</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Daily Gut: Why You Are Worse Than Hitler</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggutfeld/2010/02/25/daily-gut-why-you-are-worse-than-hitler/#IDComment58798911</link>
<description>Umm... Mugabe IS still in power. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggutfeld/2010/02/25/daily-gut-why-you-are-worse-than-hitler/#IDComment58798911</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Daily Gut: Why You Are Worse Than Hitler</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggutfeld/2010/02/25/daily-gut-why-you-are-worse-than-hitler/#IDComment58798636</link>
<description>Yet another wingnut who knows nothing about fascism beyond Jonah Goldberg&amp;#039;s historically illiterate screed... or in your case probably just the dust jacket of Jonah Goldberg&amp;#039;s historically illiterate screed.  As a fan of unintentional humor, I actually did wade through it -- but that&amp;#039;s not much of an accomplishment..  &amp;quot;Liberal Fascism,&amp;quot; like wingnut propaganda in general,  is essentially a bloated bumpersticker that doesn&amp;#039;t require a major commitment of one&amp;#039;s time. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggutfeld/2010/02/25/daily-gut-why-you-are-worse-than-hitler/#IDComment58798636</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Daily Gut: Why You Are Worse Than Hitler</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggutfeld/2010/02/25/daily-gut-why-you-are-worse-than-hitler/#IDComment58797326</link>
<description>That of course is nonsense -- the &amp;quot;Obama is Hitler&amp;quot; theme is a mainstay of Teabaggery and indeed much of the right-wing opposition.  On the other hand the fact that you feel the need to lie about this shows that you think such comparisons are a bad thing and for that I do give you some credit. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggutfeld/2010/02/25/daily-gut-why-you-are-worse-than-hitler/#IDComment58797326</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Hollywood Stand Up Guy of the Month: Patrick Warburton Criticizes &#039;Family Guy&#039;</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2010/02/25/hollywood-stand-up-guy-of-the-month-patrick-warburton/#IDComment58738235</link>
<description>I am quite sure that former semi-governor Palin does not think she &amp;quot;dropped the ball&amp;quot; with her attack on &amp;quot;The Family Guy&amp;quot; -- it is one hundred per cent consistent with her philosophy of one standard for herself and her allies and another for her opponents. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 03:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2010/02/25/hollywood-stand-up-guy-of-the-month-patrick-warburton/#IDComment58738235</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Daily Gut: Why You Are Worse Than Hitler</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggutfeld/2010/02/25/daily-gut-why-you-are-worse-than-hitler/#IDComment58737635</link>
<description>Hilarious.  Gutfeld takes to task those who compare their opponents to Hitler -- and then winds up his comments with &amp;quot;Sorry Bernie &amp;ndash; look it up. Hitler was one of yours.&amp;quot;  Sorry, Gut, but you can&amp;#039;t pimp for Jonah Goldberg&amp;#039;s historically illiterate &amp;quot;liberals are the new Hitler&amp;quot; screed, while simultaneously insisting that when you say  &amp;ldquo;if you disagree with me, then you&amp;rsquo;re worse than Hitler&amp;quot; you are joking... well, no, actually, you can and wingnuts will not call you out as a hypocrite -- but everyone else will.   Oh, and I guess I missed your post decrying the Teabaggers for the thicket of signs at their rallies that feature Obama in Hitlerian garb-and-mustache -- would you be so kind as to provide me with a link?  Thanks. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 02:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ggutfeld/2010/02/25/daily-gut-why-you-are-worse-than-hitler/#IDComment58737635</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Katherine Bigelow: Hollywood&#039;s Roger Maris?</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/kinglogan/2010/02/25/katherine-bigelow-hollywoods-roger-maris/#IDComment58730469</link>
<description>Oops.  Link doesn&amp;#039;t work.  Truly should have tried it out first.  Sorry. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 01:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/kinglogan/2010/02/25/katherine-bigelow-hollywoods-roger-maris/#IDComment58730469</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Katherine Bigelow: Hollywood&#039;s Roger Maris?</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/kinglogan/2010/02/25/katherine-bigelow-hollywoods-roger-maris/#IDComment58729940</link>
<description>Bohemond, as you can see from this link (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.popculturemadness.com/Trivia/Oscars/Top-1979-O.html),&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.popculturemadness.com/Trivia/Oscars/To...&lt;/a&gt; Apocalypse Now was practically shut out of all the major Oscars, winning only for sound and cinematography (the year was 1979, by the way).  The big winner was Kramer vs. Kramer, and as often happens, that one movie sucked all the oxygen out of the room -- it won in every major category for which it was nominated, EXCEPT supporting actor (I suppose even the Academy realized it would have been a bit much to give it to child actor Justin Henry with Duvall AND Mickey Rooney AND Melvyn Douglas as the competition).  But the Oscar rarely goes to a genuinely disturbing film like &amp;quot;Apocalypse Now&amp;quot; (or for that matter the death-obsessed musical &amp;quot;All that Jazz,&amp;quot; which was also in contention that year).  Oscar&amp;#039;s preference tends to be for the well-executed but unchallenging  -- Kramer vs. Kramer being a perfect example.  Another example -- Hoffman won that year for best actor in a role far more conventional than his three previous Oscar-nominated performances in The Graduate, Midnight Cowboy, and Lenny.   </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 01:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/kinglogan/2010/02/25/katherine-bigelow-hollywoods-roger-maris/#IDComment58729940</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Katherine Bigelow: Hollywood&#039;s Roger Maris?</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/kinglogan/2010/02/25/katherine-bigelow-hollywoods-roger-maris/#IDComment58726314</link>
<description>Badda, I didn&amp;#039;t say the Oscars have &amp;quot;NEVER been about merit&amp;quot; --  I said the Oscars have never been PURELY about merit -- which is to say that even when the winner actually IS the &amp;quot;Best Whatever,&amp;quot; the politics of Hollywood still play a part in the choice. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 01:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/kinglogan/2010/02/25/katherine-bigelow-hollywoods-roger-maris/#IDComment58726314</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Hollywood Stand Up Guy of the Month: Patrick Warburton Criticizes &#039;Family Guy&#039;</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2010/02/25/hollywood-stand-up-guy-of-the-month-patrick-warburton/#IDComment58711735</link>
<description>Ironically, Warburton is more of a &amp;quot;stand-up guy&amp;quot; for Trig Palin than Trig&amp;#039;s mom, who is only outraged by flippant references to mental disabilities when they come from her political opponents.  When they come from Rush, that&amp;#039;s just &amp;quot;satire&amp;quot; -- precisely The Family Guy&amp;#039;s excuse, and kudos to Warburton for not accepting it.   </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 22:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2010/02/25/hollywood-stand-up-guy-of-the-month-patrick-warburton/#IDComment58711735</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Katherine Bigelow: Hollywood&#039;s Roger Maris?</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/kinglogan/2010/02/25/katherine-bigelow-hollywoods-roger-maris/#IDComment58710618</link>
<description>For what he does, Cameron is one of the very best -- but what Bigelow does is much more substantial. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 22:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/kinglogan/2010/02/25/katherine-bigelow-hollywoods-roger-maris/#IDComment58710618</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Katherine Bigelow: Hollywood&#039;s Roger Maris?</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/kinglogan/2010/02/25/katherine-bigelow-hollywoods-roger-maris/#IDComment58710328</link>
<description>Well, Titov, in 1980 the eyes of the Academy overlooked &amp;quot;Raging Bull&amp;quot; and gave the Oscar to &amp;quot;Ordinary People,&amp;quot; so I eye those eyes with skepticism -- but YOUR evaluation of Marty&amp;#039;s 2006 competitors is spot on. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 22:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/kinglogan/2010/02/25/katherine-bigelow-hollywoods-roger-maris/#IDComment58710328</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Katherine Bigelow: Hollywood&#039;s Roger Maris?</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/kinglogan/2010/02/25/katherine-bigelow-hollywoods-roger-maris/#IDComment58696018</link>
<description>The Oscars have NEVER been purely about merit -- the politics of the business have always played a role in picking the winner.  For instance, &amp;quot;The Departed&amp;quot; was a fine film but hardly Scorsese&amp;#039;s best -- the Oscar surely went to him in part for all the great previous work that was overlooked and a sense that it was &amp;quot;his time.&amp;quot;  &amp;quot;The Hurt Locker&amp;quot; would be Oscar-worthy no matter what the director&amp;#039;s gender, but the voters may also think that it is time for a woman to get the honor. This is only a problem for people who believe that merit alone is the reason why every Best Director Oscar thus far has gone to men. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 20:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/kinglogan/2010/02/25/katherine-bigelow-hollywoods-roger-maris/#IDComment58696018</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Can This Possibly Be True? New Obama Missile Defense Logo Includes A Crescent</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/fgaffney/2010/02/24/can-this-possibly-be-true-new-obama-missile-defense-logo-includes-a-crescent/#IDComment58693462</link>
<description>Frank Gaffney is psychotic. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 20:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/fgaffney/2010/02/24/can-this-possibly-be-true-new-obama-missile-defense-logo-includes-a-crescent/#IDComment58693462</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>