<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/343079</link>
		<description>Comments by richCie</description>
<item>
<title>Little White Lies - Independent Film Magazine : LWLies Issue 25 is Now On Sale </title>
<link>http://www.littlewhitelies.co.uk/articles/lwlies-issue-25-is-now-on-sale-6761#IDComment32489415</link>
<description>good issue - and possibly the best subscribers gift i&amp;#039;ve ever seen offered - seriously 2666 is amazing - i hope all 200 winners read it! </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 19:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.littlewhitelies.co.uk/articles/lwlies-issue-25-is-now-on-sale-6761#IDComment32489415</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Little White Lies - Independent Film Magazine : Don&#039;t Let Him In!</title>
<link>http://www.littlewhitelies.co.uk/articles/dont-let-him-in-5701#IDComment26899317</link>
<description>interesting that the Departed is mentioned in the first reply, caught it on Film4 last week - braved it for about half an hour before allowing myself a respite from what has to be one of the most significant botched attempt at a remake, no matter what Matt Reeves film does wrong it wont do as much wrong as the Departed did (editing, script, and most importantly the bloody casting) whilst i am by no means a fan of remakes i&amp;#039;m actually interesting in LTROI&amp;#039;s redo, i was very impressed by Cloverfield afterall and there is enough scope for a very different story to come out of the book, much was lost after all. That said i doubt anyone involved in Hollywood is going to want to be too faithful to the book </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 18:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.littlewhitelies.co.uk/articles/dont-let-him-in-5701#IDComment26899317</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>