<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/708431</link>
		<description>Comments by newsallianceuk</description>
<item>
<title>BNP Reform : A Statement Relating To Jim Dowson By Shelley Rose</title>
<link>http://bnpreform.com/index.php/columnists/eddy-butler/201-a-statement-relating-to-jim-dowson-by-shelley-rose#IDComment96377574</link>
<description>Very amusing and entirely true but shouldn&amp;#039;t Simon Darby be asking &amp;#039;where&amp;#039;s Walter [Mitty]&amp;#039;?  </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 1 Sep 2010 13:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bnpreform.com/index.php/columnists/eddy-butler/201-a-statement-relating-to-jim-dowson-by-shelley-rose#IDComment96377574</guid>
</item><item>
<title>BNP Reform : Richard Edmonds Responds To His Exclusion From The Dagenham Meeting Last Week</title>
<link>http://bnpreform.com/index.php/columnists/webmaster/196-richard-edmonds-responds-to-his-exclusion-from-the-dagenham-meeting-last-week#IDComment96365305</link>
<description>Perfectly true Richard and I congratulate you for putting his matter in writing and then releasing it into the public domain. It is only a matter of time before Griffin is forced to quit or the BNP implodes, personally I think the latter. It is time to rebuild in a new nationalist party and put the defunct BNP behind us. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 1 Sep 2010 11:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bnpreform.com/index.php/columnists/webmaster/196-richard-edmonds-responds-to-his-exclusion-from-the-dagenham-meeting-last-week#IDComment96365305</guid>
</item><item>
<title>BNP Reform : A Statement Relating To Jim Dowson By Shelley Rose</title>
<link>http://bnpreform.com/index.php/columnists/eddy-butler/201-a-statement-relating-to-jim-dowson-by-shelley-rose#IDComment96360789</link>
<description>None of these allegations astound me in the slightest but what does surprise me is that Shelley saw fit to hop into bed with Simon Darby; apparently, she thought Darby could be &amp;#039;trusted&amp;#039; but it is common knowledge that he is a Griffin lick spittle and has been from the outset. At least now we now a great deal more about the real enemies of British Nationalism and perhaps we should ask why Griffin is obsessed with the concept of the BNP being infiltrated by MI5 agents? Griffin was once accused of being an MI6 agent but I have never seen any evidence to prove the smear against him. And yet Griffin liberally throws around accusations of this nature against those who oppose his misrule or refuse to turn a blind eye to his many years of well-documented corruption. My &amp;#039;reward&amp;#039; for daring to oppose the Griffin gang in pubic was to be accused of being an MI5 agent, then a madman, and then a Searchlight mole, and when all that failed, they resorted to deny reference. I am really astonished that it has taken so many BNP senior activists so long to wake up to the reality of the crooked Griffin gang. If MI5 want to infiltrate the BNP, it is not difficult because Griffin has no concept or real understanding of operational security and rules through fear, paranoia and threats. Is this the end of the BNP or the end of a BNP misled by the Griffin gang? </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 1 Sep 2010 10:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bnpreform.com/index.php/columnists/eddy-butler/201-a-statement-relating-to-jim-dowson-by-shelley-rose#IDComment96360789</guid>
</item><item>
<title>BNP Reform : Time For A New Party?</title>
<link>http://bnpreform.com/index.php/columnists/lee-barnes/149-time-for-a-new-party#IDComment95007802</link>
<description>&amp;#039;Britain First&amp;#039; would be better! </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 18:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bnpreform.com/index.php/columnists/lee-barnes/149-time-for-a-new-party#IDComment95007802</guid>
</item><item>
<title>BNP Reform : Time For A New Party?</title>
<link>http://bnpreform.com/index.php/columnists/lee-barnes/149-time-for-a-new-party#IDComment95007714</link>
<description>In all honesty Lee, it is time to start a new British Nationalist political party because the BNP has run its course and will forever be associated with hardcore Nazism and Combat 18 from the party&amp;#039;s past, not to mention the plethora of Griffin dirt rehashed by the mainstream puppet media every election. We have to be bold, sure and focused in our purpose to create a new Britain but for this to happen a new party must be born with all the best ideals of the BNP and taking on board its best people. Griffin [sic semper tyrannis] has expelled or driven away all the best men and women the party recruited in the past and we must regroup with the best of the old order and a create a new party that will smash the Griffin/Dowson BNP at the ballot box and rescue our once great nation from the destroyers of the NWO. We must act in an organised manner and swiftly with ruthless efficiency if we are to save our nation and first British Nationalism. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 18:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bnpreform.com/index.php/columnists/lee-barnes/149-time-for-a-new-party#IDComment95007714</guid>
</item><item>
<title>BNP Reform : Jim Dowson</title>
<link>http://bnpreform.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;amp;view=article&amp;amp;id=71:jim-dowson&amp;amp;catid=34:latest-news#IDComment95004225</link>
<description>Analysis is one thing and Eddy has always been a sound analyst but where is the specific blueprint for the removal of Nick Griffin? It is imperative that we devise a strategy on which we are clear to oust Griffin but about which he has no idea for tactical reasons. Over to you.... </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 17:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bnpreform.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;amp;view=article&amp;amp;id=71:jim-dowson&amp;amp;catid=34:latest-news#IDComment95004225</guid>
</item><item>
<title>http://www.hobart-hampden.co.uk/sonsofsoldiers/ : Monarchy debate with Peter Hitchens</title>
<link>http://www.hobart-hampden.co.uk/monarchy_debate_with_peter_hitchens.html#IDComment42717105</link>
<description>I want to live in republic so why can&amp;#039;t I be allowed to elect my Head of State? Why do Hitchens and his so called democratic buddies in the establishment try to silence all calls for referendum on the monarchy? Perhaps you can answer that one Mr Hitchens or are you just another safety valve scribbler like the rest of the tame media? </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.hobart-hampden.co.uk/monarchy_debate_with_peter_hitchens.html#IDComment42717105</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>