en-us https://www.intensedebate.com/users/458896 Comments by ranch http://www.koaa.com/aaaa_top_stories/x1934384268/Bill-would-keep-Army-off-public-land#IDComment17847096 The army has land in different places they aren't utilizing now, why take peoples land that has been in their family for generations. The land has historical marking, Indian carvings , and beauty that they usually want to save. But the MOST important thing is not to take land from the people that this has been their home and livelihood for so long, and where can they go to do the same thing?? This way of live and livelehood is sparce. Isn't no one thinking of the people ??? When the army could train at other places, it makes you wonder if they want this for (monetary ) or some other reason. I think all the people are partotic, that has nothing to do with this situation. Mon, 30 Mar 2009 04:25:20 +0000 http://www.koaa.com/aaaa_top_stories/x1934384268/Bill-would-keep-Army-off-public-land#IDComment17847096