IntenseDebate - ralphinfidel

14 years ago @ Jihad Watch - Jihad Watch: Liberal g... · 0 replies · +1 points

ralph, you, as an individual, are not required to do a single thing by allowing gays their freedom and right not to be persecuted. About the only thing required from you or indeed anyone who doesn't necessarily agree with homosexuality is just not to act like a Barbarian Babboon, or a Muslim, when seeing Homosexuals. That's IT.

It should be pretty obvious that your wish has already been granted.

It's a vast difference from Islam which demands conformity to the letter of its Barbarian book, under the threat of death.

That's exactly my point.

14 years ago @ Jihad Watch - Jihad Watch: Liberal g... · 2 replies · +2 points

In other words yes Islam boasts a problem for all mankind, and it's obviously one that must be united against. But for most gays i'd assume they don't want to get involved in a global war. They just want to live their lives, as they are, and that means the only real enemy to their peace would be the most local oppressive force, which in the U.S. is usually Christian extremists as stated earlier.

It seems to me that there's a bit of a problem with that theory; in a global war, by definition, gays will be involved whether they want to be or not.

If our society's social conventions and self confidence are sufficiently fragmented under the constant attack of groups demanding acceptance (indeed, celebration) of every possible tangential lifestyle and political ideology that can be thought of, it's only a matter of time before Islamic extremists will be the “most local oppressive force” for gays.

In other words, you are protesting for acceptance in a zone of safety provided, in large part, by the ideology of those you are protesting against.

Good luck with that.

14 years ago @ Jihad Watch - Jihad Watch: Fitzgeral... · 0 replies · +4 points

“We cannot disguise hostility towards any religion behind the pretence of liberalism."

And certainly, we should not allow the hostility of the most dangerous militaristic political philosophies to stalk us under the camouflage of a religion.

Nor should we attempt to hide our regression to Progressive authoritarianism behind any pretence of empathy, progress, or intellectualism. It is none of those. It is the combination of intellectual laziness, unwarranted arrogance, and cynical emotional manipulation. It’s a toxic mix of irrational utopian goals, unbridled jealously, and a thinly disguised racial hatred; just as in the twentieth century.

There is nothing new here. This is not change; it is simply regression to failures of the past. It’s the same old combination of newspeak and doublespeak with new faces. And sadly, it will likely lead to the same results: a generation lost to self-inflicted poverty, and ultimately, war.

14 years ago @ Jihad Watch - Jihad Watch: Arkansas ... · 1 reply · +1 points

That in fact, our government might just not be prepared to protect its own citizens...

It might we ll turn out that we are seeing the beginning of another Germany, 1933..and like the free-wheeling Germans of Weimar, we're perfectly happy to shut out eyes..to the creeping destruction of our nation..

Yep, and it looks like the most zealous, and incompetent, intellectual lightweights have floated to the top positions in the government. Despite their self-congratulatory teleprompted rhetoric, it would amaze me if some of them could start a car without special training, much less design one or run a profitable company. They want everyone (except themselves, of course) to be equally poor, and serve them. It’s “social justice”, don’t you know.

I’m anxiously waiting for the “people’s car” of the 21st century. We can just call it the BW, the “BrokeWagen”.

14 years ago @ Jihad Watch - Jihad Watch: Did Obama... · 0 replies · +3 points

OT:
Robert, I just did a few Google searches with “jihadwatch” as a keyword, and one with it as the only keyword. Google apparently no longer returns direct links to the jihadwatch website. Pretty strange, considering not long ago I would have gotten several pages of links directly to your site.

I thought I might have missed an announcement that the government bought Google ahead of the President’s trip to Saudi Arabia. You know, to make it more "efficient".

14 years ago @ Jihad Watch - Jihad Watch: Obama Adm... · 0 replies · +2 points

Shhhh! Rational thought and reason are "so yesterday".

14 years ago @ Jihad Watch - Jihad Watch: Obama rei... · 0 replies · +2 points

Yup.

14 years ago @ Jihad Watch - Jihad Watch: Obama rei... · 0 replies · +2 points

Obama reinstating immigration program that has brought 24 suspected jihadists into the US... Well sure, you know, to do the jobs Americans won't do.

14 years ago @ Jihad Watch - Jihad Watch: Muqtada a... · 0 replies · +5 points

"Squeal like a pig, errr, I mean goat"?

15 years ago @ Jihad Watch - Jihad Watch: Algeria: ... · 0 replies · +1 points

Algeria is suffering a potato shortage because officials have imposed strict controls on the use of fertiliser to stop al Qaeda militants using it as a bomb-making ingredient, farmers said.

Sounds like a progressive policy formulation: punish everyone except the Man Caused Disaster makers. Simply brilliant. Well, simple anyway. Is Napolitano advising Algeria?

"When you ask for 10 kg of ammonia you get only 5 kg and you need to wait a long time before the local chamber of agriculture deals with your request," he said. "The direct impact is a poor harvest and a rise in prices."

Welcome to government control over the means of production.

IntenseDebate Comment System

Connect with ralphinfidel

People I'm following

ralphinfidel