This isn't about Obama vs. McCain, this is about stealing. The fact that you condone it because you believe that what was stolen was personally "unacceptable" for display, demonstrates that you believe it's okay to do something illegal so long as it validates your own bias.
They posted it onlne thinking there would be no one watching; the fact that it got a lot of people interested is what brought the media; the family didn't contact the media, the media contacted the family.
In the last election it was the same kind of thing with the Kerry signs. If you can't stand Obama, put your money where your mouth is and donate to McCain's campaign and get a freekin' sign and put it in your own yard. In fact go volunteer for McCain's campaign instead of being a lazy criminal and pulling people's signs up. I find it interesting the same "McCain supporters" who argue about "government leaving people alone" or "our borders should be protected from illegals who come to this country to commit crimes" are okay with someone getting into someone else's buisness by doing something illegal themselves and trespass in someone's property to steal something that doesn't belong to them....simply because they disagree with it.
Erickson knew that Cuban cigars are illegal here and obviously demonstrated how rediculous he thought the law to illegalize Cuban cigars are. All that patriotic talk against Cuba. Makes me wonder what other laws Erickson feels are ridiculous that he's willing to circumvent them to get what he wants. And what about that non-existent hospital he gave the stuff to? Is that all part of the non-existent charity work he did? Just another spoiled rich kid who still thinks he can do whatever he wants because he has the money. And this is just stuff Erickson wasn't even hiding. What about stuff he's hid? Get to know your gril buddy cause you're about to know how meat feels like.
The two girls were having sex with one guy? Maybe it's me but what sort of girl decides it's okay to have sex with a guy and another girl and is still "shocked" that it was filmed? So if he was just a year younger would he still be charged with "Felony encouraging child sexual abuse in the first degree". If the girls got filmed and they had no knowledge of it then that's one thing, but child abuse? How about if he was 17 years, 11-months and 29 days old? Is it still child abuse? What a waste of justice.
Wenning is violating the law too, but it's okay huh? Because he's doing a patriotic thing. Oh, but here I thought the reason why you blowhards are against these "illegal aliens" is because they broke the law to begin with...you know, they paid an average of $1000 to cayote and risked their lives to come here to look for work you don't like to do. And the Wenning's of this world doesn't like "illegal activity" so he's going to do the holy thing and does something illegal himself to protest and illegal activity? Now that's a blowhard.
I like how all these anti-immigrant horn-tooters don't need proof that people are illegal, they just need to know that you don't need to check someone's identification at a certain place for them to automatically conclude that everyone there is illegal. Paahhleeze, everybody knows that you blowhards automatically think without even ever visiting the place, that the folks at these day-labor shelters are Hispanic? And that's what you don't like, isn't it? If it was filled with a bunch of Canadians you wouldn't be as hyped up about it. Oh and by the way if it was such a haven for illegal aliens don't you think INS would be camping outside of the facility and stop every car and ask for documentation...even though-in the facility you don't have to.
![[Avatar]](/images/avatar26.png){kind=avatar}
Creation