<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/776363</link>
		<description>Comments by piratecoastbucs</description>
<item>
<title>Breitbart.com : Obama calling for more infrastructure spending</title>
<link>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9I2GF601&show_article=1#IDComment97695011</link>
<description>Here&amp;#039;s a crazy, WHACKY, idea.... How about using $50 Billion of the more than $300 Billion left from the first stimulus... </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Sep 2010 22:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9I2GF601&show_article=1#IDComment97695011</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Statement from James O&#039;Keefe</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/jokeefe/2010/01/29/statement-from-james-okeefe/#IDComment54454728</link>
<description>wow.. just as delusional as Obama is.  btw.. it&amp;#039;s PWN3D.  If your gonna try to sound cool, at least do it right.    Defending O&amp;#039;Keefe blindly is insane. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 04:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/jokeefe/2010/01/29/statement-from-james-okeefe/#IDComment54454728</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Statement from James O&#039;Keefe</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/jokeefe/2010/01/29/statement-from-james-okeefe/#IDComment54445761</link>
<description>Lol.. denial.. how it must be.  Admit it, O&amp;#039;Keefe screwed up and compromised the entire effort against ACORN.  I have faced it and accepted it.. Now you must too.  You cannot defend his actions.  He was up to no good in a US Senator&amp;#039;s FEDERAL office. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 03:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/jokeefe/2010/01/29/statement-from-james-okeefe/#IDComment54445761</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Statement from James O&#039;Keefe</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/jokeefe/2010/01/29/statement-from-james-okeefe/#IDComment54444323</link>
<description>Do you really think that it&amp;#039;s OK, what he tried to do in a US Senator&amp;#039;s office? Do you?  and yes.  Google: &amp;#039;601 Database redigestation error.&amp;#039;  Amazingly you&amp;#039;ll find  dozens of other stories about being banned from REDSTATE.COM after disagreeing with the staff.   :) </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 03:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/jokeefe/2010/01/29/statement-from-james-okeefe/#IDComment54444323</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Statement from James O&#039;Keefe</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/jokeefe/2010/01/29/statement-from-james-okeefe/#IDComment54443494</link>
<description>Again...  &lt;a href=&quot;http://media.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/nation/pdf/FBI_affadavit_012610.pdf&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://media.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/nation/pdf...&lt;/a&gt;  Are you really that ignorant?   Epic Fail.  That is what you are. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 03:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/jokeefe/2010/01/29/statement-from-james-okeefe/#IDComment54443494</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Statement from James O&#039;Keefe</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/jokeefe/2010/01/29/statement-from-james-okeefe/#IDComment54442251</link>
<description>Read it and weap you pathetic waste.  Sit down and shut up you fool.  Go join the Green Party, they take pussies all day every day.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://media.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/nation/pdf/FBI_affadavit_012610.pdf&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://media.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/nation/pdf...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 03:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/jokeefe/2010/01/29/statement-from-james-okeefe/#IDComment54442251</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Statement from James O&#039;Keefe</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/jokeefe/2010/01/29/statement-from-james-okeefe/#IDComment54441714</link>
<description>Maybe if you read the FBI releases you might learn a thing or two you dumbass. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 03:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/jokeefe/2010/01/29/statement-from-james-okeefe/#IDComment54441714</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Statement from James O&#039;Keefe</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/jokeefe/2010/01/29/statement-from-james-okeefe/#IDComment54440755</link>
<description>And so I take it that you agree that you would like Liberals pretending to be utility workers in order to get information from YOUR representative&amp;#039;s offices? </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 03:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/jokeefe/2010/01/29/statement-from-james-okeefe/#IDComment54440755</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Statement from James O&#039;Keefe</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/jokeefe/2010/01/29/statement-from-james-okeefe/#IDComment54440447</link>
<description>&amp;quot;Innocent as O&amp;rsquo;Keefe&amp;rsquo;s actions may appear&amp;quot;  Miss that part did ya?  </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 03:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/jokeefe/2010/01/29/statement-from-james-okeefe/#IDComment54440447</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Statement from James O&#039;Keefe</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/jokeefe/2010/01/29/statement-from-james-okeefe/#IDComment54438612</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;m not courting Dem or Independent votes.  Defending suspicious activity logically drives away much wanted votes.  And I HAVE NOT SAID HE WAS GUILTY OF A CRIME.  Everyone is saying, &amp;quot;Good Job James&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Keep it up James&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Way to be brave James&amp;quot;...  I&amp;#039;m saying that YOU shouldn&amp;#039;t be too quick to defend him. It&amp;#039;s the same concept.  It works both ways.    He wouldn&amp;#039;t have been ARRESTED if he was just in her public office twiddling his thumbs and sucking on a lollipop.  I like to think that a TRUE conservative would think about something objectively instead of blindly jumping up to defend and encourage someone who was just arrested by the FBI.  THEY WERE WEARING UNIFORMS, THEY DID CLAIM TO BE TELEPHONE COMPANY WORKERS, THEY DID ATTEMPT TO DECEIVE FEDERAL SECURITY in the office of a UNITED STATES SENATOR, not an ACORN office.    If this were a NOW worker in a Republican&amp;#039;s office you would be calling for their head and you know it.  AND, I would use this as an albatross to HANG AROUND ANY DEMOCRAT&amp;#039;S NECK, especially any of them that would be dumb enough to defend these actions.  I&amp;#039;d rather be a weak smart conservative than an idiotic self-destroying one. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 03:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/jokeefe/2010/01/29/statement-from-james-okeefe/#IDComment54438612</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Statement from James O&#039;Keefe</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/jokeefe/2010/01/29/statement-from-james-okeefe/#IDComment54432958</link>
<description>Yeah.  It&amp;#039;s the reaction you usually expect when the Moderators have their asses handed to them by their readers. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 02:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/jokeefe/2010/01/29/statement-from-james-okeefe/#IDComment54432958</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Statement from James O&#039;Keefe</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/jokeefe/2010/01/29/statement-from-james-okeefe/#IDComment54432738</link>
<description>I don&amp;#039;t need you, or anyone else to believe I am or am not a conservative.  That lies within my own conscience, not yours.  Telling me what I am or am not, however, is NOT conservatism.  And for your knowledge winning elections IS about the amount of votes, at least the last time I checked it does matter with whom you associate or defend...  So yes, being concerned about being too quick to defend this idiot is a very valid point.  And being BANNED from REDSTATE.COM for stating the same is as UN-CONSERVATIVE as it gets.  Again, attempting to evade proper FEDERAL security procedures by using false pretenses IS NOT CONSERVATISM, it is anything but, and defending anyone who attempts to do so isn&amp;#039;t either.  Conservatism is holding EVERY PERSON accountable for their actions, not just liberals.   </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 02:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/jokeefe/2010/01/29/statement-from-james-okeefe/#IDComment54432738</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Statement from James O&#039;Keefe</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/jokeefe/2010/01/29/statement-from-james-okeefe/#IDComment54430572</link>
<description>Well I hoped to get an audience that thinks...  When I comment that REDSTATE.COM should not be so quick to defend O&amp;#039;Keefe the way that they have I recieved this answer:  &amp;quot;E Pluribus Unum Friday, January 29th at 5:55PM EST (link)  God, but I&amp;rsquo;m feeling sharky today.  We took down your message &amp;mdash; which is more thanSenator Louisiana Purchase (crook-LA) did for her constituents. Thank you for your input. We&amp;rsquo;ll see who gets their butts kicked good in November.  Bye now.&amp;quot;  Now you tell me.  You really think that kind of attitude is going to win independent or even democratic votes?  Totalitarian censorship is a liberal tactic, not that of a blog that claims to be for conservatism. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 02:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/jokeefe/2010/01/29/statement-from-james-okeefe/#IDComment54430572</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Statement from James O&#039;Keefe</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/jokeefe/2010/01/29/statement-from-james-okeefe/#IDComment54428538</link>
<description>OMG.. I just got banned on REDSTATE.COM because I disagree with their &amp;quot;Defend this idiot O&amp;#039;Keefe at all costs&amp;quot; attitude.  That&amp;#039;ll look great to the independents; defend those attempting to evade federal security procedures through false pretenses.  Grammatically challenged REDSTATE.COM is banning conservatives for not towing the exact party line!   </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 01:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/jokeefe/2010/01/29/statement-from-james-okeefe/#IDComment54428538</guid>
</item><item>
<title>A Political Season : Banned from Redstate?</title>
<link>http://politicalseason.blogspot.com/2009/01/banned-from-redstate.html#IDComment54425989</link>
<description>I too just got the &amp;#039;601&amp;#039; error after criticizing them for being so quick to defend James O&amp;#039;Keefe and his stupid actions in attempting to bypass FEDERAL security.  I said that I thought this was borderline treason.  He attempted to bypass federal offices under false pretenses.  I am a strong conservative and a registered republican.  I am outraged that they did this.  Ridiculous.  I disagree with the editors and they boot me.  Cowards. COWARDS!  They just get into their little jerking circle and attempt to mock a commenter that disagrees with the hard party line then get off by blocking their account.  It&amp;#039;s OK though.  They have little credibility with me as a news source anyhow.  Not a day has gone by since I started reading it that there weren&amp;#039;t major grammatical errors in nearly every article, even headlines.  Nothing like fighting off a &amp;#039;red state stereotype&amp;#039; than not knowing how to read/write.   </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 01:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://politicalseason.blogspot.com/2009/01/banned-from-redstate.html#IDComment54425989</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Statement from James O&#039;Keefe</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/jokeefe/2010/01/29/statement-from-james-okeefe/#IDComment54422451</link>
<description>No.  This is not a partisan issue.  The kid was trying to get through FEDERAL security by not representing himself truthfully.  This is no different than bypassing airline security, white house security, FBI security, etc...  I do not like Sen. Landrieu, but she is still a United States senator.  The office must be respected regardless of ideology.  O&amp;#039;Keefe was attempting to subvert every single American.  A senator is a senator.  But I do agree that most on these forums would be convicting him if he were a NOW supporter or even ACORN member doing this to a republican office.  If conservatives can&amp;#039;t see the danger in defending his actions in any way, shape or form then we are screwed.   </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 00:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/jokeefe/2010/01/29/statement-from-james-okeefe/#IDComment54422451</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Statement from James O&#039;Keefe</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/jokeefe/2010/01/29/statement-from-james-okeefe/#IDComment54421067</link>
<description>Easy there Yoda.    First, 60 Minutes isn&amp;#039;t stupid enough to do this in a FEDERAL OFFICE.    Second, I never said he broke in, you assumed I said that. He showed up in costume under false pretenses - FACT.    Third, &amp;#039;Pirate Coast&amp;#039; refers to the title of a book by Richard Zacks.  It&amp;#039;s about a president named Thomas Jefferson and a certain incident involving the Barbary Pirates.  The US Marine Corps has a song.. you know the one that ends in, &amp;quot;.. the shores of Tripoli.&amp;quot;  I happen to think that this book tells one of the greatest stories in American history.  Yup, I&amp;#039;m such a horrible American.    Fourth, I have been a Tampa Bay BUCS fan for life and I think I have the right to be one in ANY state.    Finally, taking a highly negative line and holding to it is deadly for any political agenda.  The democrats holding onto, and still pursuing, health care is deadly for them.  Whereas, defending someone who just attempted to do something that is potentially criminal is also deadly for conservatives.  If you cannot see this then conservatives may not have as much going for them as we thought this fall.    And for the record, I would like Crist to get his fake-baked ass handed to him by Rubio.    PS.    Definition of &amp;#039;maladroit&amp;#039;:  Inept......       Figures. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 00:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/jokeefe/2010/01/29/statement-from-james-okeefe/#IDComment54421067</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Statement from James O&#039;Keefe</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/jokeefe/2010/01/29/statement-from-james-okeefe/#IDComment54419158</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;d love to see this list of &amp;#039;conservative principles&amp;#039;.  I&amp;#039;m sure that he could have achieved whatever it is he was attempting to do WITHOUT dressing up with a tool belt and showing up under false pretenses.  Does your list of &amp;#039;conservative principles&amp;#039; include attempting to deceive the security of federal buildings? Mine doesn&amp;#039;t.        Blindly defending someone is standard practice for fools.    MW Dictionary:    Main Entry: in&amp;middot;fil&amp;middot;trate  Pronunciation: \in-ˈfil-ˌtrāt, ˈin-(ˌ)\  Function: verb     4 : to enter or become established in gradually or unobtrusively usually for subversive purposes.    Yes, he attempted to INFILTRATE a FEDERAL BUILDING. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 23:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/jokeefe/2010/01/29/statement-from-james-okeefe/#IDComment54419158</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Statement from James O&#039;Keefe</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/jokeefe/2010/01/29/statement-from-james-okeefe/#IDComment54415935</link>
<description>&amp;quot;[M]ore tolerant of O&amp;#039;Keefe&amp;quot;?  Just like we have been &amp;#039;more tolerant&amp;#039; of liberal Republicans like McCain and Bennett?  Keep being tolerant of this.  See just how far it persuades independents or even democrats to vote for conservatives.  I don&amp;#039;t need to prove that I am a conservative to you or to anyone.    He tried to enter a federal building under false pretenses.  If this does not bother you and you feel the need to defend this fool in his actions then you must enjoy having the tyrannical fist of liberals pressing on you.  Attempting to portray O&amp;#039;Keefe as a victim or hero here will only hurt conservatives.  Yes, wise advice for conservatives, don&amp;#039;t defend the indefensible.. MAN, I&amp;#039;M SUCH A LIBERAL!  Conservatives defending this idiot is no different than Obama and liberals still trying to ram through health care.  </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 23:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/jokeefe/2010/01/29/statement-from-james-okeefe/#IDComment54415935</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Statement from James O&#039;Keefe</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/jokeefe/2010/01/29/statement-from-james-okeefe/#IDComment54410983</link>
<description>SCREW YOU!  I am a Utah Red State Conservative and I believe that wrong is wrong.  If you are a conservative and you think that what he did is okay then I would rather have no part in being one.  Maybe you are the one who needs to consider your own label.  Quote stupid, old, overused lines much? </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/jokeefe/2010/01/29/statement-from-james-okeefe/#IDComment54410983</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>