peanutbutt11
18p14 comments posted · 1 followers · following 0
14 years ago @ World In Conversation - Voices From The Classroom · 0 replies · +1 points
I never for one second believed that the US government invaded Iraq in order to protect the poor people of Iraq from the wrath of Saddam Hussein. Coincidentally, Iraq also has a lot of oil! I don’t support wars to begin with, but ones where economic superpowers invade poor countries that are rich in natural resources, make me so disappointed in human morals. Especially seeing how these soldiers behaved in a country in which they were supposed to restore order was saddening to watch. Poverty and dissatisfaction is what causes uprisings and how the US army behaved was simply unacceptable. Crushing a poor man’s vehicle because he stole wood so that he could keep his family warm? Running another car off the road just for fun? This kind of behavior disgusts me.
14 years ago @ World In Conversation - Voices From The Classroom · 0 replies · +1 points
Then I felt bad. Why did I almost accuse him in my mind of beating his children? Just because I couldn’t imagine any of my other family members in that situation, I picked the one cousin I knew little about and said it must be him, because Sam said that abuse occurs in every family. That’s the thing with accusations – they are most likely wrong. And should you accuse every suspect? This was the fundamental problem with this scandal: No one knew how true it was. Granted, there was precedent. But no one wants to accuse a former colleague, a friend, of something so horrible. Something so awful that no one even wants to believe it. Because that was my initial reaction: disbelief. We want to believe in the good in people and never want to think that something as terrible as abuse could happen in one’s surroundings. We try to block the bad out and try to suppress (or hide) it until it is no longer possible. This is unfortunate and terrifying to think about if there are victims but it is unfortunately the truth.
Am I scared that as my family grows, this will spiral out of control? No, not really. Because this will not happen in my immediate family. I don’t care if that sounds ignorant and naïve but I just know that I would never let this happen. There are many cases of sexual abuse where the mother says she doesn’t know about it. What I think is that she’s too scared to want to know about it. Then she’d have to take action and leave her husband, and many women are too scared to do that.
14 years ago @ World In Conversation - Voices From The Classroom · 0 replies · +1 points
Then I felt bad. Why did I almost accuse him in my mind of beating his children? Just because I couldn’t imagine any of my other family members in that situation, I picked the one cousin I knew little about and said it must be him, because Sam said that abuse occurs in every family. That’s the thing with accusations – they are most likely wrong. And should you accuse every suspect? This was the fundamental problem with this scandal: No one knew how true it was. Granted, there was precedent. But no one wants to accuse a former colleague, a friend, of something so horrible. Something so awful that no one even wants to believe it. Because that was my initial reaction: disbelief. We want to believe in the good in people and never want to think that something as terrible as abuse could happen in one’s surroundings. We try to block the bad out and try to suppress (or hide) it until it is no longer possible. This is unfortunate and terrifying to think about if there are victims but it is unfortunately the truth.
Am I scared that as my family grows, this will spiral out of control? No, not really. Because this will not happen in my immediate family. I don’t care if that sounds ignorant and naïve but I just know that I would never let this happen. There are many cases of sexual abuse where the mother says she doesn’t know about it. What I think is that she’s too scared to want to know about it. Then she’d have to take action and leave her husband, and many women are too scared to do that.
14 years ago @ World In Conversation - Voices From The Classroom · 0 replies · +1 points
But enough about snack food... The underlying principle here is that of our morals. If we know that what we are consuming is a product of exploitation or maybe even unfair wages, then if we consume it regardless, we are bad people. Right?
Then look down at the shoes you’re wearing. Someone was exploited for that. The same goes for you shirt and your jeans. So you probably should not wear them anymore. Well that’s not very realistic.
So how else can we fix this problem of exploitation of labor? We could pressure the major companies that utilize cocoa beans harvested by slaves.
Interest groups are already doing this and have had some success but clearly not enough, if slave labor still exists in this world.
The question of morals has recently been brought up a lot at Penn State. Is legally doing everything correctly enough? Or does one need to do more than just what is required of you? In other words, we are legally permitted to buy whatever chocolate we want. But any morally responsible person would by fair trade chocolate instead; to make sure that no person had to suffer in order for me to enjoy that chocolate.
When these slaves are liberated and they hear that people in other countries eat chocolate in truckloads, they grow angry. They are angry that they have had to go through life-threatening conditions in order for someone else to enjoy a piece of chocolate. These slaves have never even tasted chocolate. Our ignorance outrages them and they are upset that they had to suffer for someone else’s enjoyment. This is similar to what is going on here. The rest of the world does not understand how we support someone who was somehow involved in a child abuse scandal and all they see us as now, is a bunch of mindless idiots who couldn’t care less that nine innocent children have been raped. By rioting about Joe Paterno getting fired, we signal to the rest of the world that football is a greater concern to us than the serious injustice of child abuse. This sheds an awful light on our university and tipping over news vans and ripping out street lanterns definitely does not give us a better image. We have been depicted like savages, and in light of recent events, this is not so inaccurate.
14 years ago @ World In Conversation - Voices From The Classroom · 0 replies · +1 points
Although I deeply regret not learning more Chinese, or even assimilating myself more into Chinese culture than I did, I don’t know what more I could have done. I did not want to go to a Chinese school and I’m glad I didn’t because I met some of my best and longest friends at the German school I attended. And while I did go to many typical Chinese restaurants and was continuously exposed to the Chinese way of life and culture, the things I did with my friends were particularly foreign. The clubs and bars we went to were filled with Americans, Germans, French people, Spaniards or anyone else who happened to live in Shanghai and was foreign.
So then we get to the question of assimilation: Should immigrants try to assimilate into the culture of the country they are living in? Again, generally I would say yes. But having been the “immigrant” (and in fact being one right now) I tend to cling to my national identity and my culture. I feel that being German is what I am and that with every day, I become more and more Americanized. I am Americanized to the point where people no longer believe me when I say I’m German. But that is still what I see myself as. I also believe that the desire to continue your cultural habits is the reason for immigrant enclaves. When you are in a foreign country together, you end up talking to strangers just because you overhear them speak the same language as you. When a German exchange student came to my high school, I immediately sought his friendship and even though we probably wouldn’t have been friends in Germany, we were friends here.
14 years ago @ World In Conversation - Voices From The Classroom · 0 replies · +1 points
Furthermore – and I hope this doesn’t make me sound like a white supremacist, because I’m not – white people have always managed to be the elite. In any country, even when whites are a minority, they are upper class and manage to be in the country’s elite. Look at South Africa for example. 80% of the population is African, and only 9% is white. However, apartheid programs on anyone who was non-white enforced racial segregation. How do you explain that?
I think it’s easy. (And this will make me sound really racist) The white race will always manage to be on top. There is too much evidence in history of white dominance and while I by no means think it’s fair, it is a fact. Furthermore, it is not like there are more white people than any other race on this planet. The Asian continent is densely populated, with the Chinese and many other Southeast Asian countries’ populations soaring through the roof. The African continent’s population is also increasing at a much faster rate than any westernized (i.e. white) country. Additionally, the landmass of Europe is much smaller than that of any other continent, which again means less white people. Although the North American continent is pretty large and mostly inhabited by white people this still does not mean that there are more white people in the world than any other race.
Obviously then, the white race doesn’t dominate due to sheer numbers. Regardless of why the white race seems to be the elite even in countries like South Africa, where they make up less than 10%of the population, it is a fact that they do. When I lived in China, white people were obviously a minority. But instead of being treated like some minorities are treated here, we were the elite. White people were in all the places of power of foreign firms – CEOs and other high rank position were almost always held by Europeans or Americans. Furthermore, since we occupied all of the well-paid jobs, we obviously had a lot of money. With this money, we paid for our private chauffeurs, maids, and only ate at the finest restaurants. We were the one percent everyone has recently been complaining about. And we were a minority. So even though this makes me seem ignorant, I think it’s okay that white people will be a minority. Because honestly, it won’t change anything.
14 years ago @ World In Conversation - Voices From The Classroom · 0 replies · +1 points
Furthermore – and I hope this doesn’t make me sound like a white supremacist, because I’m not – white people have always managed to be the elite. In any country, even when whites are a minority, they are upper class and manage to be in the country’s elite. Look at South Africa for example. 80% of the population is African, and only 9% is white. However, apartheid programs on anyone who was non-white enforced racial segregation. How do you explain that?
I think it’s easy. (And this will make me sound really racist) The white race will always manage to be on top. There is too much evidence in history of white dominance and while I by no means think it’s fair, it is a fact. Furthermore, it is not like there are more white people than any other race on this planet. The Asian continent is densely populated, with the Chinese and many other Southeast Asian countries’ populations soaring through the roof. The African continent’s population is also increasing at a much faster rate than any westernized (i.e. white) country. Additionally, the landmass of Europe is much smaller than that of any other continent, which again means less white people. Although the North American continent is pretty large and mostly inhabited by white people this still does not mean that there are more white people in the world than any other race.
Obviously then, the white race doesn’t dominate due to sheer numbers. Regardless of why the white race seems to be the elite even in countries like South Africa, where they make up less than 10%of the population, it is a fact that they do. When I lived in China, white people were obviously a minority. But instead of being treated like some minorities are treated here, we were the elite. White people were in all the places of power of foreign firms – CEOs and other high rank position were almost always held by Europeans or Americans. Furthermore, since we occupied all of the well-paid jobs, we obviously had a lot of money. With this money, we paid for our private chauffeurs, maids, and only ate at the finest restaurants. We were the one percent everyone has recently been complaining about. And we were a minority. So even though this makes me seem ignorant, I think it’s okay that white people will be a minority. Because honestly, it won’t change anything.
14 years ago @ World In Conversation - Voices From The Classroom · 0 replies · +1 points
The definition of a poser according to urbandictionary.com is someone who tries to fit into a profile they aren’t. Technically speaking, Amanda fits this category. She’s Asian but grew up around other minorities (my guess is largely African Americans) and thus acts like them. I would not have considered her a poser however, because I often think of her as black. To me, a poser is someone who PRETENDS to be something they’re not. An example of this would be if I, an extremely white (in all meanings of the word) girl started hanging out with people from North Philadelphia and tried to be like them. But that’s not the case with Amanda – she doesn’t have to pretend to be black, she pretty much is. But maybe I don’t consider her a poser because she is a minority. Maybe I would look at it differently if she were a white girl who only hung out with black people and tried to speak and act like them. But even then, the environment you grow up in shapes who you are, even if it doesn’t fit the stereotype of your race.
I’m not trying to say that acting like people of another race could never make you a poser, because it can. For example, in the movie Bring It On (Part 3), this stereotypical white cheerleader is forced to move out of her privileged school district and into a less well-off area. At first, she largely resists changing herself to fit in with everyone else, but eventually she caves in and starts to act like her new friends. When her old friends see her, they call her out on it and tell her how much she’s changed. This girl then is a poser because she changed to fit in with other people. It would be comparable to me deciding that I only want to hang out with Latinos from here on out and start to speak and dress like them. It’s not who I am and if I pretend to be something I’m not, then that makes me a poser.
14 years ago @ World In Conversation - Voices From The Classroom · 0 replies · +1 points
For example, from very early on, my parents always explained their decisions to me rather than just punish me for something I did. Therefore, I believe in conversation. I believe talking about it, regardless of if you are white, black or brown can solve everything. Other things I learned from very early on that I do not believe are intrinsic in your genetic makeup is tolerance and openness to other cultures. My parents also stressed the importance of that but what really taught me to be tolerant was living all over the world and traveling. Often times, I was a minority and even though everyone was always very nice and even excited to see someone of a different race, I still felt… different. Excluded. I can’t even begin to imagine what it must be like to be a minority and suffer under discrimination.
The question if your race determines your view of the world also touches on a current very heated subject: terrorism. Since 9/11, terrorism has been closely associated with Middle Eastern Muslim men. So does that mean that because they are Middle Eastern, they are prone to be violent? No, because anyone can be a terrorist. We cannot generalize that simply because in recent years there have been growing feelings of anger towards the United States and the Western world in general, all Middle Easterners are violently inclined. No race has certain intrinsic values. This belief is what led to the holocaust. The Nazis, and many before them, believed that certain races were better and others inferior. They also frequently spoke of the Germanic loyalty, which according to them, only people of the Nordic race possessed.
Furthermore, I have many friends from various races and it’s not like I have noticed that for example, Asians in general are less friendly or blacks would be very honest. Every person is different not because of their race but just because of who they are. You cannot make generalizations about a race because your race doesn’t define who you are. If I was black or Asian, I would still be the same person. Even if I was born in India but then adopted by my parents, I would still be exactly the same person because I was shaped by who raised me, not by my skin color.
14 years ago @ World In Conversation - Voices From The Classroom · 0 replies · +1 points
Whites (Americans): suburban, single-family home, one car per person, try very hard to be politically correct, make sure their kids are involved in various sports and go to church every Sunday. Clearly, what I described here is the white middle class. So what about the working class? They do not “fit” my stereotype, yet they are white. And they certainly do not hold true for all of my friends. Granted, this applies to all of my friends from home since we live in the same school district and thus in similar neighborhoods. However, this stereotype only applies to about a quarter of the friends I made at school, almost all of which are white.
African Americans: I did not have much (or any) contact with this race until I got to college. There were about five black people at my high school and they pretty much stayed by themselves. I was not even aware of many of the stereotypes encircling black people until I had lived here for a year, and the ones I had before then were relatively harmless. The only stereotype about black people I had was that their English was intelligible to me. It was pretty hard for me to understand English as it was, but with their different way of pronouncing things, I had a much harder time understanding them. This stereotype has held true. At work this year was the first time I ever had prolonged conversations with an African American girl. It was difficult for me to understand her at first, but I have gotten better at it and we get along really well.
Asians: since I have lived in China, I cannot see Asians stereotypically. Before I moved there, I thought all they said was “ching chang chong” and that they eat dogs, but even that I only thought jokingly. I am glad that I had the opportunity to live there and to experience the Chinese culture firsthand. While the Asian work ethic really is as crazy as everyone says, and while yes, the children do all learn to play the piano and study all night, there is so much more to the Chinese culture than the obsession to be over prepared for every situation.