<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/601858</link>
		<description>Comments by pcjoylov</description>
<item>
<title>A Cup of Hermes : Guns and Violence</title>
<link>http://www.depthpsychologytoday.com/2009/07/02/guns-and-violence/#IDComment27054045</link>
<description>I was just thinking along a different line of thought. . . . .                               You ask, what do you think contributes to our cultural violence?  I think violence is a value-laden term--that is, what one person views as violence may not be viewed as violence by others(s).  So, violence (say, cultural violence) is a matter of perception or, stated another way, one person&amp;#039;s view (or, perhaps, response) to a situation or thing.  As such, we can control violence by controlling that within us that is violent--like you come across to me as saying.  Forget about trying to control what&amp;#039;s outside of us, get to the genesis within and think differently, see differently, to feel differently and behave differently. THAT could squelch a lot of violence?  So, then, what may contribute to our cultural violence is a lack of *insight* toward a particular culture by any number of people? I know this begs, then, the definition and explanation of the notion of insight but in effort to circumvent the need for that I offer the idea that one demonstrates being with insight as not being in *opposition*, where opposition is a term I use to explain what I think is the sense of violence. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 18:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.depthpsychologytoday.com/2009/07/02/guns-and-violence/#IDComment27054045</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>