<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/665548</link>
		<description>Comments by ordinal</description>
<item>
<title>Shopping Cart Disco : Robotic DMCA</title>
<link>http://shoppingcartdisco.com/?p=5285#IDComment40461987</link>
<description>Oh, and the answer to &amp;quot;can the Lindens take this copybotted dress away from me&amp;quot; is: &amp;quot;Do you have a licence to distribute this digital content? No, you don&amp;#039;t. Would LL be allowing somebody to distribute unlicenced content if they continued to let you wear it? Yes, they would.&amp;quot; </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 18:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://shoppingcartdisco.com/?p=5285#IDComment40461987</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Shopping Cart Disco : Robotic DMCA</title>
<link>http://shoppingcartdisco.com/?p=5285#IDComment40461540</link>
<description>It isn&amp;#039;t like buying counterfeit goods, and it isn&amp;#039;t like receiving stolen goods. Those examples are just not at all relevant, regardless of whether we are dealing with virtual handbags here.  In order to understand what happens we actually have to look at what is taking place, and not fall back on these twee RL comparisons. The law is not the same and the activities are not the same either.</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 18:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://shoppingcartdisco.com/?p=5285#IDComment40461540</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Shopping Cart Disco : Rebel Hope &amp; RH Engle&#039;s 3 Woodshed Sims Copied</title>
<link>http://shoppingcartdisco.com/?p=4734#IDComment35218077</link>
<description>Restricting access to NPOF is neither effective not in the slightest practical. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 22:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://shoppingcartdisco.com/?p=4734#IDComment35218077</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>