<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/333241</link>
		<description>Comments by oilman</description>
<item>
<title>Oilman : I Must Not Understand The New Math</title>
<link>http://www.oilman.ca/sem/i-must-not-understand-the-new-math/#IDComment27536239</link>
<description>Dave - thanks for the great response. That\\\&#039;s the kinda stuff I was hoping to trigger :) </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.oilman.ca/sem/i-must-not-understand-the-new-math/#IDComment27536239</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Oilman : I Must Not Understand The New Math</title>
<link>http://www.oilman.ca/sem/i-must-not-understand-the-new-math/#IDComment27460379</link>
<description>Kenny - my point is that that typically when you start raising budgets by that magnitude often ROI goes down. I\\\&#039;m stating a very specific case and will endeavor in future to provide more detailed background.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; You are talking about an entirely different situation than I am presenting here. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 20:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.oilman.ca/sem/i-must-not-understand-the-new-math/#IDComment27460379</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Oilman : I Must Not Understand The New Math</title>
<link>http://www.oilman.ca/sem/i-must-not-understand-the-new-math/#IDComment27459568</link>
<description>Kenny - you\\\&#039;re missing the point - I higher spend at a lower ROI can put more money in the bank so why not spend more at a lower ROI if it\\\&#039;s making you more money in the end? ROI and budgets be damned - full steam ahead. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 20:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.oilman.ca/sem/i-must-not-understand-the-new-math/#IDComment27459568</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>