en-us https://www.intensedebate.com/users/528415 Comments by odinga http://biggovernment.com/jpollak/2011/10/25/barack-obama-led-occupychicago-circa-1988/#IDComment212281074 You forgot the obvious violent protests that Obama supported for his cousin Odinga in the Kenya elections of 2007. That's the gun that Obama brings to the table when the election is not going the way he wants it to. Tue, 25 Oct 2011 20:36:43 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/jpollak/2011/10/25/barack-obama-led-occupychicago-circa-1988/#IDComment212281074 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.e16db70adb3c742a3386ea10319a7112.1f1&show_article=1#IDComment193535859 After speaking with a number of Europeans, it is evident that the DNC propaganda machine is well established in Europe. The unfortunate Europeans have been blinded to the truth and only see well-filtered, heavily-agenda'd images of anything American. Europeans know the work of Joseph Goebbels and tend to be very appreciative to learn that they have been had. They turn around much faster than American liberal lemmings when they are exposed to the truth. For starters, very few Europeans know that Obama is a chain smoker. The state propaganda machine has been very powerful in its handling of agenda-driven images of the US. Thu, 15 Sep 2011 04:45:27 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.e16db70adb3c742a3386ea10319a7112.1f1&show_article=1#IDComment193535859 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.937a29e74a6fa43f33a85ed42e22fb84.11&show_article=1#IDComment116232547 Imagine that! Muslims welcome a Christmas Tree more than leftists in the United States. Liberal used to mean openness to competition of ideas and opposition to censorship. The leftists in the US are not liberal, they are pure fascist. Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:59:03 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.937a29e74a6fa43f33a85ed42e22fb84.11&show_article=1#IDComment116232547 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.65d35f849629004f3f01ff977b2a3e33.741&show_article=1#IDComment108076123 If the climate didn't change, it wouldn't be called the "climate." duh. Fri, 5 Nov 2010 21:41:54 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.65d35f849629004f3f01ff977b2a3e33.741&show_article=1#IDComment108076123 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.65d35f849629004f3f01ff977b2a3e33.741&show_article=1#IDComment108075862 The UN can begin shaking off its reputation as a complete crock by first taxing and fining a couple real prominent polluters to hell: Al Gore and Michael Moore. Fri, 5 Nov 2010 21:39:52 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.65d35f849629004f3f01ff977b2a3e33.741&show_article=1#IDComment108075862 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GGECE00&show_article=1#IDComment81713273 Ah Soros...the guy who got started with the confiscated wealth of Holocaust victims. Soros is lower than whale excrement at the bottom of the ocean. Wed, 23 Jun 2010 15:24:53 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GGECE00&show_article=1#IDComment81713273 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GGECE00&show_article=1#IDComment81713068 "Obama refused govt funds and you surely were one of the foolish that supported him." Yah right. What do you call ACORN funds? And what about Planned Parenthood's missing $Billion in its accounting? Obama's in the pocket. Hell, Obama's campaign in 2007 had no shortage of accolades for BP. We should talk about Moonbeam here. If Obama endorses Moonbeam, Moonbeam's real lack of credentials will be confirmed. Wed, 23 Jun 2010 15:23:39 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GGECE00&show_article=1#IDComment81713068 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GGECE00&show_article=1#IDComment81712484 Except we're talking about Oakland. If Brown wanted to walk his talk as _mayor_of_oakland_, he would have dwelled in an Oakland-median-income-property down at street level. At least, he had a dwelling there. Did he actually live there? We don't know. But Whitman's $3Million is actually a bigger nothing in Atherton, but Atherton is not an average place. Wed, 23 Jun 2010 15:19:29 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GGECE00&show_article=1#IDComment81712484 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GGECE00&show_article=1#IDComment81711311 "Who donates $90 million to their own campaign as if it were pocket change and then expects to balance the budget?" Somebody who is spreading the wealth. Go Whitman! That's a far better stimulus than having the government spend _your_ money that you don't have to further enlarge the public debt. Wed, 23 Jun 2010 15:15:10 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GGECE00&show_article=1#IDComment81711311 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GGECE00&show_article=1#IDComment81710926 I'm disappointed that Breitbart posts an AP article. To be American and to give it a fair trial though, $1.8Million is nothing when it comes to California real estate. However, Oakland is the dumps and got worse under Mayor Moonbeam. He would have been more impressive and would have walked his talk if he took an Oakland median-income dwelling instead of continuing his sheltered existence. $3Million is an average Atherton single family home value. Whitman is average there, but there's nothing very average about Atherton. For the record, I did not vote for Whitman in the primary, and would never in a million years if the primary were done again. But there's no way that I will vote for Moonbeam in November. Funniest AP quotes: "He said Brown's reputation is one of his strongest advantages" Moonbeam's reputation is his Achilles tendon. We know exactly who he is. He is a loser. Fiscal issues may be his only positive point, unlike Gray-out Davis or Arnold. On social issues, most California governors have all been serious disappointments including Reagan. Wed, 23 Jun 2010 15:13:43 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9GGECE00&show_article=1#IDComment81710926 http://biggovernment.com/publius/2009/11/24/acorn-document-dump-california-voters-prepare-to-be-acorned/#IDComment44606580 This is the way Gore becomes the most polluting man in the world. He justifies it by buying "carbon credits." In other words, he moves money from his right pocket to his left pocket and says that he's helped the universe. Then the pyramid scheme grows. Now the airline industries let you contribute to the funds for "carbon credits." Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:36:22 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/publius/2009/11/24/acorn-document-dump-california-voters-prepare-to-be-acorned/#IDComment44606580 http://biggovernment.com/publius/2009/11/24/acorn-document-dump-california-voters-prepare-to-be-acorned/#IDComment44606326 Is ACORN the master or just an apprentice? Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:33:06 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/publius/2009/11/24/acorn-document-dump-california-voters-prepare-to-be-acorned/#IDComment44606326 http://biggovernment.com/publius/2009/11/24/acorn-document-dump-california-voters-prepare-to-be-acorned/#IDComment44606240 What are the names of these other corporate shells? Would the California Teachers Association be one of them? Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:31:45 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/publius/2009/11/24/acorn-document-dump-california-voters-prepare-to-be-acorned/#IDComment44606240 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9BNJKN00#IDComment41547109 Who cares if the GOP becomes just another face in a multi-party system? It would be about time to breakdown the two party system. Mainstream media needs to stop trying to brainwash the population into thinking two-party. Mon, 2 Nov 2009 20:12:26 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9BNJKN00#IDComment41547109 http://biggovernment.com/mvadum/2009/10/01/exclusive-acorn-legal-memo-confirms-depths-of-troubles/#IDComment36747839 If this ripples as far as Watergate did, which it could very quickly, Pelosi becomes President by 2010. Unless the GOP has a miracle or the Kool-Aid drinkers of 2008 turn around en masse, there's no way that Pelosi will lose her #3 position. But then what are the chances that this ACORN empowered anti-Constitutional Congress or Judiciary would follow the Constitution to impeach and convict. Their ilk seldom resign so... Thu, 1 Oct 2009 18:12:10 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/mvadum/2009/10/01/exclusive-acorn-legal-memo-confirms-depths-of-troubles/#IDComment36747839 http://biggovernment.com/mvadum/2009/10/01/exclusive-acorn-legal-memo-confirms-depths-of-troubles/#IDComment36747454 Will this ripple as far as Watergate did? Thu, 1 Oct 2009 18:06:47 +0000 http://biggovernment.com/mvadum/2009/10/01/exclusive-acorn-legal-memo-confirms-depths-of-troubles/#IDComment36747454 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9B1P9A00#IDComment36634510 Iran did just roll Barry. Barry just said no to nukes. Shortly after, Iran announced that it's going for nukes. Thank Barry for disarming the free world. The French Sarkozy just rolled Barry too by demonstrating that even the French have more backbone to standup to Iran. Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:06:33 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9B1P9A00#IDComment36634510 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9B1P9A00#IDComment36634194 "The Cost [to liberals] is as not relevant as the cost of the automobile and mortgage market bailout costs were not relevant." Yes and No. The same liberals who say that trillions in new debt are acceptable, are also saying that the cost of another 9/11 is irrelevant. Who needs an enemy when the Congress, that controls the purse strings of the nation, is doing more damage than any WMD could. Yes again. The original AP writer either ignorantly or negligently fails to mention that ABM has always been intended to be a layered defence strategy. So what if one system is only 90% effective? The strategy relies on multiple layers, each 90% effective. The total effectiveness becomes quite solid. No again. There's apparently no defence against the Mass Destruction caused by the Congressional leadership that's been there in place since 2007. Poor Obama just doesn't have the qualifications to help the situation. It's time to get a real president again. Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:02:32 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9B1P9A00#IDComment36634194 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9A6RBR00#IDComment31394494 If you had a clunker and were smart enough to ignore Obama, guess what? Your clunker's going to be worth a lot more than $4500 in a few months. And you won't have to wait for the government to rob more Americans for that $4500. The Cash-for-Clunkers program has destroyed a lot of clunkers. That means the premium on the working parts of remaining clunkers has gone up. If you want to succeed, ignore Obama and his fascist allies. Thu, 20 Aug 2009 22:26:03 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9A6RBR00#IDComment31394494 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9A6RBR00#IDComment31394140 So the United States government just spent another $billion still-to-be-paid taxdollars for the Cash-for-Clunkers program. Okay fuel efficiency went up and Japan got some more $$. More federal staffers have new stimulus jobs to process these deals at snail-like speeds. Other than that, millions of Americans have been screwed by the program. The guy with the new car? Gee, the car dealers raised the ceilings on negotiable prices to start off. The guys with new cars got deals not much better than good negotiation used to be able to get. Others who wanted new cars? They all got screwed. The ceilings on negotiable prices went up. Competition for used cars got smashed with the clunkers. Poor people? They all got screwed. They couldn't afford new cars anyway. The car dealers? They all got screwed. How many are out $100,000's in IOU's from the Obamadministration? Charity organizations. They all got screwed. They could have actually provided real help to real people from the proceeds of the used car auctions. Do you feel the stimulus yet? Can we imagine what Obamacare might do? Thu, 20 Aug 2009 22:20:59 +0000 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9A6RBR00#IDComment31394140