<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/4987675</link>
		<description>Comments by norepinephrine</description>
<item>
<title>KOMO - Seattle, WA : Accused rapist wins right to woman\&#039;s Google searches | Local &amp; Regional | Seattle News, Weather, Sp</title>
<link>http://www.komonews.com/news/local/Accused-rapist-wins-right-to-womans-Google-searches-158322875.html#IDComment379267063</link>
<description>Are you threatening me? Where did you get this &amp;quot;straw man&amp;quot; theory and can you please specify as to what you are even trying to say....?  The court, ran by Judge Adler, has indefinitely ordered the victim to turn over excruciating evidence to the defenses case. Where in this did you get the idea that its not going to happen? The woman will go to jail and be in contempt of court is she refuses to hand over evidence supporting her theory. There are exceptions to the rule.... maybe you are mad because because nothing you ever did was good enough to be the exception.. like your grammar and english for example.. or even the way you hold yourself and beg for equality and justice from the rich, yet stomp you foot ad done and throw tantrums to prove your point. If we were debating in front of the police right now and you were speaking to me the way you are portraying yourself by yelling and calling names... the would probably see it as a threat and you would be arrested and possibly thrown in to a psych ward for evaluation because a lot of people with irrational thinking and yelling and outbursts have a mental psychological handicap.  At least i have a enough humility to say that my comment out of passion was wrong by 200 years and corrected my mistake...  But to you.. that comment alone is a &amp;quot;straw man.&amp;quot; Pointing out something that is complete irrelevant to the basis and structure of my personal point.   &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man&lt;/a&gt;  Please leave me alone.  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 16:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.komonews.com/news/local/Accused-rapist-wins-right-to-womans-Google-searches-158322875.html#IDComment379267063</guid>
</item><item>
<title>KOMO - Seattle, WA : Accused rapist wins right to woman\&#039;s Google searches | Local &amp; Regional | Seattle News, Weather, Sp</title>
<link>http://www.komonews.com/news/local/Accused-rapist-wins-right-to-womans-Google-searches-158322875.html#IDComment379245540</link>
<description>Oh, and you need to read the reference.... You are really embarrassing yourself. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 15:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.komonews.com/news/local/Accused-rapist-wins-right-to-womans-Google-searches-158322875.html#IDComment379245540</guid>
</item><item>
<title>KOMO - Seattle, WA : Accused rapist wins right to woman\&#039;s Google searches | Local &amp; Regional | Seattle News, Weather, Sp</title>
<link>http://www.komonews.com/news/local/Accused-rapist-wins-right-to-womans-Google-searches-158322875.html#IDComment379243877</link>
<description>It&amp;#039;s not a &amp;quot;search warrant&amp;quot; like someone else stated... Where in ANy article does it say &amp;quot;search warrant?&amp;quot;  It&amp;#039;s a simple request for information regarding and pertaining to the defenses truth.  When they seized the defendant.. they took his computer and hard drive and google search.... Why can&amp;#039;t it be a fair trial?   Oh, but the point.. it&amp;#039;s NOT A SEARCH WARRANT.... It&amp;#039;s a request for information regarding the case.  i should get paid for my time spent on reading your stupidity and irrational commenting.  </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 15:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.komonews.com/news/local/Accused-rapist-wins-right-to-womans-Google-searches-158322875.html#IDComment379243877</guid>
</item><item>
<title>KOMO - Seattle, WA : Accused rapist wins right to woman\&#039;s Google searches | Local &amp; Regional | Seattle News, Weather, Sp</title>
<link>http://www.komonews.com/news/local/Accused-rapist-wins-right-to-womans-Google-searches-158322875.html#IDComment379232359</link>
<description>You know what... you&amp;#039;re just a terrible person and i choose to stop bickering with someone who is so bitter.. it&amp;#039;s like beating a dead horse...  Good luck with whatever it is you are dong.. and don&amp;#039;t forget to leave an obscene and irrelevant comment after my last two .. just for the sake of getting the last word in and obstructing what should be just.  I choose to go to the park, safely without my stalker... because I willingly  tuned over excruciating evidentiary email that proved my innocence and his guilt ....to keep him far far away..   Yeah, i want to go outside safely.. instead of argue with an angry angry man.  Take care!  The court has ordered. accept defeat. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 15:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.komonews.com/news/local/Accused-rapist-wins-right-to-womans-Google-searches-158322875.html#IDComment379232359</guid>
</item><item>
<title>KOMO - Seattle, WA : Accused rapist wins right to woman\&#039;s Google searches | Local &amp; Regional | Seattle News, Weather, Sp</title>
<link>http://www.komonews.com/news/local/Accused-rapist-wins-right-to-womans-Google-searches-158322875.html#IDComment379225425</link>
<description>You&amp;#039;re right! I&amp;#039;ll give you that one.... It was 400 years ago... I must have lost track of time in the heat of passion...  But! It was just less than 200 years ago were we thought it was okay to exercise slavery.  And back to the case reference... Every court DID NOT outweigh the request.. The supreme court approved it. Look It up.  If you watch this live airing of the debate at the supreme court.. you&amp;#039;ll observe that the woman&amp;#039;s personal attorney actually giggles and laughs at the procedure .. like it&amp;#039;s not a mans life at stake... my concern is hat she actually says the words towards the end of her time.. &amp;quot;it&amp;#039;s expensive&amp;quot; which is highly unclasp in a formal court argument.. concerning me that they are more concerned with the settlement at hand than the mans life.   It&amp;#039;s actually a good reference....  When you open, click on the &amp;quot;State vs. Thomas Harry Bray&amp;quot; and sit down and watch the whole thing if you wish to do so..   &lt;a href=&quot;http://oregoncourts.mediasite.com/Mediasite/Catalog/catalogs/default.aspx&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://oregoncourts.mediasite.com/Mediasite/Catal...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 15:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.komonews.com/news/local/Accused-rapist-wins-right-to-womans-Google-searches-158322875.html#IDComment379225425</guid>
</item><item>
<title>KOMO - Seattle, WA : Accused rapist wins right to woman\&#039;s Google searches | Local &amp; Regional | Seattle News, Weather, Sp</title>
<link>http://www.komonews.com/news/local/Accused-rapist-wins-right-to-womans-Google-searches-158322875.html#IDComment379217168</link>
<description>Probable cause that she is lying: 1)Glitches in her statement that is published by the bend bulletin. She remembers/ she doesn&amp;#039;t remember. 2) She &amp;quot;thinks&amp;quot; the wine glasses were switched. 3) She was tsupposidely harshly brutally &amp;quot;thrown&amp;quot; on to a bed where the man who supposedly &amp;quot;threw&amp;quot;  her is physically handicap. 4) She&amp;#039;s not turning over a court ordered seize of documents... that shouldn&amp;#039;t be a problem to turn over if she is such an innocent victim of crime.  I personally issued a restraining order on a man that was continuously stalking me from my parents house and harassing me through phone texts and email... I WILLINGLY AND PROUDLY handed over to the court, prosecution, and to whomever it may concern to MAKE SURE that scary man was by law kept far far away from me.   If this woman is so innocent... why is she hiding evidence that can put him in prison so that the man can&amp;#039;t hurt me either?  THAT is my probable cause and personal history.  Pleas, your honor.. exorcise your right to get that woman&amp;#039;s document so that I can be safer on the street. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 14:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.komonews.com/news/local/Accused-rapist-wins-right-to-womans-Google-searches-158322875.html#IDComment379217168</guid>
</item><item>
<title>KOMO - Seattle, WA : Accused rapist wins right to woman\&#039;s Google searches | Local &amp; Regional | Seattle News, Weather, Sp</title>
<link>http://www.komonews.com/news/local/Accused-rapist-wins-right-to-womans-Google-searches-158322875.html#IDComment379205914</link>
<description>Ummm..... actually Mr. Rush... In defense of Mr. donkjen, if you click on his profile name... you&amp;#039;ll see his website. He&amp;#039;s a photographer. A quite decent one as well. Where did you get the idea that he is &amp;quot;rich, liberal elitist?&amp;quot;    To me, it seems like he&amp;#039;s probably a normal well-rounded man.. obviously with some intelligence to be able to be objective to what your vulgar comments  say and stand up for sanity.....    WOW Rush !!! You&amp;#039;re really mad at the fact that you consider yourself to be a &amp;quot;peasant&amp;quot; and instead of trying to change that about yourself, you choose to yell and complain and call people names and stomp your foot because you think you deserve what others have worked really hard for in life.    I have an idea! Maybe you could go on an internet date with a female executive, doctor, lawyer.. sleep with her.. then accuse her of rape and sexual assault so you don&amp;#039;t have to be a &amp;quot;peasant&amp;quot; any longer! It&amp;#039;s your free ride to get back at those big bad mean rich, liberal elitists. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 14:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.komonews.com/news/local/Accused-rapist-wins-right-to-womans-Google-searches-158322875.html#IDComment379205914</guid>
</item><item>
<title>KOMO - Seattle, WA : Accused rapist wins right to woman\&#039;s Google searches | Local &amp; Regional | Seattle News, Weather, Sp</title>
<link>http://www.komonews.com/news/local/Accused-rapist-wins-right-to-womans-Google-searches-158322875.html#IDComment378842188</link>
<description>uhhh. if we still had the same laws as 200 years ago, we&amp;#039;d still be burning witches. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 00:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.komonews.com/news/local/Accused-rapist-wins-right-to-womans-Google-searches-158322875.html#IDComment378842188</guid>
</item><item>
<title>KOMO - Seattle, WA : Accused rapist wins right to woman\&#039;s Google searches | Local &amp; Regional | Seattle News, Weather, Sp</title>
<link>http://www.komonews.com/news/local/Accused-rapist-wins-right-to-womans-Google-searches-158322875.html#IDComment378834923</link>
<description>I am saying she is lying. Should i go file? because somebody&amp;#039;s life is at stake here. or should i stick my head in the sand like REAL victims are known for doing.. the reason why THIS WOMAN&amp;#039;s records should be retrieved because REAL victims of heinous crimes need to stand up.. Not hide any little detail and pull the victims rights bs... 4 months later!!!! When the rights were meant for REAL VICTIMS of crime.. not those after a free ride. If there is nothing to hide.. what the heck are you trying to protect? Anything that may be &amp;quot;embarrassing&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;irrelevant&amp;quot; or anything to that nature will not be admissible in the court. They by god will not llow that.. this woman is so protected under so many laws that were made for the true and innocent... true and innocent.. hand your google mail and information over.. for the sake of justice and truth! Make an example to other women that if this happens to them and they have to turn documents over in order to put a terrible perpetrator in prison so that he can not and will not EVER be able to hurt another innocent young woman.. then so be it! Turn it over then get your millions!  What the heck is there to hide??? She&amp;#039;d been asked since december! Pete&amp;#039;s sake. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 00:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.komonews.com/news/local/Accused-rapist-wins-right-to-womans-Google-searches-158322875.html#IDComment378834923</guid>
</item><item>
<title>KOMO - Seattle, WA : Accused rapist wins right to woman\&#039;s Google searches | Local &amp; Regional | Seattle News, Weather, Sp</title>
<link>http://www.komonews.com/news/local/Accused-rapist-wins-right-to-womans-Google-searches-158322875.html#IDComment378826237</link>
<description>um.. they did. Brigid Turner is the main prosecutor in this case.. but until the head DA is proved guilty.. he&amp;#039;s still an overseeing. So, why are his right as &amp;quot;innocent until proven guilty&amp;quot; exorcised and Dr. Bray&amp;#039;s are not?  Nobody really wants to make the DA mad.. you know what I mean? The press may just be a little more lenient. </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 00:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.komonews.com/news/local/Accused-rapist-wins-right-to-womans-Google-searches-158322875.html#IDComment378826237</guid>
</item><item>
<title>KOMO - Seattle, WA : Accused rapist wins right to woman\&#039;s Google searches | Local &amp; Regional | Seattle News, Weather, Sp</title>
<link>http://www.komonews.com/news/local/Accused-rapist-wins-right-to-womans-Google-searches-158322875.html#IDComment378806960</link>
<description>can you please provide the accredited reference as to where you got this idea?..... thanks. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 23:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.komonews.com/news/local/Accused-rapist-wins-right-to-womans-Google-searches-158322875.html#IDComment378806960</guid>
</item><item>
<title>KOMO - Seattle, WA : Accused rapist wins right to woman\&#039;s Google searches | Local &amp; Regional | Seattle News, Weather, Sp</title>
<link>http://www.komonews.com/news/local/Accused-rapist-wins-right-to-womans-Google-searches-158322875.html#IDComment378802140</link>
<description>Yes, sir. As I had mentioned before.. the leading DA in this case has some &amp;quot;uh-oh&amp;#039;s!&amp;quot; himself. All the more reason to direct the attention to another and try as hard as his little heart can to get a &amp;quot;huge&amp;quot; conviction. And police, well.. i have no comment.. they go with the flow because they are the little guys once it gets handed to the DA.  AND... ANYBODY licensed to protect humanity and practice justice is &amp;quot;allowed&amp;quot; to ASK for any information... otherwise.. it&amp;#039;s obstruction of justice. Just like ANYBODY can go make a claim so heinous, ANYBODY, especially a licensed professional can ASK for a record retrieval.. Would a doctor hide a sufficient discovery in medicine because we our bound by law for medical confidentiality? NO! We are gong to publish an article about the discovery.. respecting the patients privacy.. UNDER LAW.. and make sure that we are aware this rare medical case CAN happen.. so that others can be saved and aware as well. same difference, she&amp;#039;s still anonymous... we just want to know facts.  and i disagree. Every legal case has to do with every other legal case because that is how we make discoveries.. so that we can make new laws.. so that we can protect our people.. so that we can live... free. every big legal case has reference to other legal cases, if you&amp;#039;d like to look it up.. just like every medical discovery has reference to similar discovery... same/similar symptoms = smiler/same diagnosis.. or at least in the same family of err. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 23:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.komonews.com/news/local/Accused-rapist-wins-right-to-womans-Google-searches-158322875.html#IDComment378802140</guid>
</item><item>
<title>KOMO - Seattle, WA : Accused rapist wins right to woman\&#039;s Google searches | Local &amp; Regional | Seattle News, Weather, Sp</title>
<link>http://www.komonews.com/news/local/Accused-rapist-wins-right-to-womans-Google-searches-158322875.html#IDComment378781862</link>
<description>The prosecutor or the cop i think would rather win the hearts of america by convicting a 5 star medical school doctor of a heinous crime. The DA in this case has his own accusations to deal with at this time and would look really good for him to have this rare conviction. Why would the judge overrule the county&amp;#039;s top DA and face national hate threats by victim advocacy group if there was not sufficient enough evidence beyond reasonable doubt to retrieve this woman&amp;#039;s search history? All I am saying is there is a lot we do not know.. but professional people do not go out on a &amp;quot;hunch&amp;quot;... in public.... off of a single theory. There HAS to be something.. otherwise maybe we should all stop working since a lot of people think the world is going to end.. no, logic tells us that is likely not too happen.  I think the crime is beyond knowing what rape is. Plus, people know what  &amp;quot;forceful and brutal&amp;quot; rape is. It contradicts her statement of she &amp;quot;wasn&amp;#039;t sure if it was rape&amp;quot; and then claims it was definitely &amp;quot;forceful and brutal&amp;quot; rape. It also contradicts her statement of &amp;quot;not remembering and being thrown on to the bed&amp;quot; with the grew some details of her stating very clearly what happened that night and then being able to just get up and walk free and then making the claim she was possibly drugged and dint remember because he  supposedly  &amp;quot;switched drinks&amp;quot; as well. Oh, but in the beginning she just remembers being thrown on to the bed... by a man who is physically disabled. I think Houze is being quite kind at the moment. False accusations do happen.. look at the young man in long beach who just got release after 10 years after the woman who claimed he attacked her tried to friend the man on Facebook. He hires a PI, she admits she made it up.. and do you know what she says.. &amp;quot;Do i have to give the money back.&amp;quot; 10 years and a football scholarship to USC.. GONE!... &amp;quot;Do i have to give the money back?&amp;quot; </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 22:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.komonews.com/news/local/Accused-rapist-wins-right-to-womans-Google-searches-158322875.html#IDComment378781862</guid>
</item><item>
<title>KOMO - Seattle, WA : Accused rapist wins right to woman\&#039;s Google searches | Local &amp; Regional | Seattle News, Weather, Sp</title>
<link>http://www.komonews.com/news/local/Accused-rapist-wins-right-to-womans-Google-searches-158322875.html#IDComment378636905</link>
<description>well, probable falsely accusing someone of a crime that could essentially cost them all their freedom, so basically their life, IS A CRIME.  Thank you.  There has to be more in-depth reason for the judge to believe this is true, that may not be allowed to be publicized under the victim rights protections. As far as right ow, she&amp;#039;s innocent until proven guilty too and under law.. whatever is not being allowed for us to see.. must be good stuff! </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 17:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.komonews.com/news/local/Accused-rapist-wins-right-to-womans-Google-searches-158322875.html#IDComment378636905</guid>
</item><item>
<title>KOMO - Seattle, WA : Accused rapist wins right to woman\&#039;s Google searches | Local &amp; Regional | Seattle News, Weather, Sp</title>
<link>http://www.komonews.com/news/local/Accused-rapist-wins-right-to-womans-Google-searches-158322875.html#IDComment378629255</link>
<description>$3, 000, 000 highly unlikey? By the way... did any of the other woman claim marks? It would be weird that a 37 year old, not bad looking physician, only left visible sex play marks on ONE woman his entire life. I would think other women would here about it and want to get in on the action..  heck! class action lawsuit girls! come take your piece. sig me up. I&amp;#039;ll go leave a mark and take a photo as well. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 17:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.komonews.com/news/local/Accused-rapist-wins-right-to-womans-Google-searches-158322875.html#IDComment378629255</guid>
</item><item>
<title>KOMO - Seattle, WA : Accused rapist wins right to woman\&#039;s Google searches | Local &amp; Regional | Seattle News, Weather, Sp</title>
<link>http://www.komonews.com/news/local/Accused-rapist-wins-right-to-womans-Google-searches-158322875.html#IDComment378622843</link>
<description>It&amp;#039;s in the FBI research statistics. And its actually 49-51% every year since the year 1999. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 17:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.komonews.com/news/local/Accused-rapist-wins-right-to-womans-Google-searches-158322875.html#IDComment378622843</guid>
</item><item>
<title>KOMO - Seattle, WA : Accused rapist wins right to woman\&#039;s Google searches | Local &amp; Regional | Seattle News, Weather, Sp</title>
<link>http://www.komonews.com/news/local/Accused-rapist-wins-right-to-womans-Google-searches-158322875.html#IDComment378620694</link>
<description>The 21 year old was quoted in an article after the initial arrest saying &amp;quot;he&amp;#039;s a caring and kind person&amp;quot; and even went as far as to say he would share his patient letters and stories with her reminiscing about when he was a practicing physician before his injury. Even quoting &amp;quot;everything was &amp;quot;consensual.&amp;quot; And then 7 months later makes the accusation of ... oh yeah! i was raped as well two weeks prior to the other girl being attacked. i Think the initial commenter was suggesting about the other article saying he had a restraining order with a 27 year old woman in california... which in turn.. we know nothing about because this woman decided not to commune with the press.  all the stories are mostly at the bend bulletin. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 17:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.komonews.com/news/local/Accused-rapist-wins-right-to-womans-Google-searches-158322875.html#IDComment378620694</guid>
</item><item>
<title>KOMO - Seattle, WA : Accused rapist wins right to woman\&#039;s Google searches | Local &amp; Regional | Seattle News, Weather, Sp</title>
<link>http://www.komonews.com/news/local/Accused-rapist-wins-right-to-womans-Google-searches-158322875.html#IDComment378614365</link>
<description>yeah, but don&amp;#039;t you think the defense has addressed the previous accusation from the beginning? I mean, as a professional I&amp;#039;m sure they have to cover all aspects and if things were so bad.. don&amp;#039;t you think they&amp;#039;d shoot for a plea bargain? That article with the previous order says that woman and Bray had a long history and it also states she was incapable to comment because of her current court cases&amp;#039; statistics. We do not know the whole story, but I am guessing if that previous woman thought Bray was a rapist perpetrator, she would be supporting the complainer and possibly suing Bray as well. There isn&amp;#039;t many details about the previous order in the press and so i think it&amp;#039;s safe to ask the question.. why? If we use critical thinking skills here, i am sure that there is much more detail and depth than the &amp;quot;victim&amp;quot; just searching the definition of rape. Obviously if a young woman is in shock, it&amp;#039;s only natural to make sure.. But I&amp;#039;m thinking maybe there is more to it.. for almost $3,000,000. That&amp;#039;s a big dream a hard one to let go when you&amp;#039;re hoping for, you know. I&amp;#039;m sure Houze has much experience and knowledge and has a bigger imagination than just looking up a definition of &amp;quot;forcible rape.&amp;quot; I think victims should have a right to nondisclosure, but rare cases, especially when somebody&amp;#039;s LIFE is at stake.. all materials necessary should be in the open. And as previously said in another comment.. &amp;quot;things that are not relevant will not be admissible..&amp;quot; which should dismiss the concern of them &amp;quot;battering&amp;quot; Jane Doe &amp;quot;again.&amp;quot; The woman with the restraining order could have recanted because it was the right thing to do when it could have been exaggerated or even just to &amp;#039;get back&amp;#039; at him for something he did to make her mad. The defense must have something for them to pursue and be so persistent, i mean over and over again since december. Any attorney in their right mind wouldn&amp;#039;t put themselves in that kind of light in the world if they did not truly truly believe and to even call it &amp;quot;the discovery of this information id the heart of the defendants case&amp;quot; if there wasn&amp;#039;t something much.. much deeper. Let&amp;#039;s be a little skeptic and think outside the box. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 17:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.komonews.com/news/local/Accused-rapist-wins-right-to-womans-Google-searches-158322875.html#IDComment378614365</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>