<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/752209</link>
		<description>Comments by newscaper</description>
<item>
<title>Big Government : More Christmas Bombing Fallout: Hillary’s Visa Problem </title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/rgrenell/2010/01/07/more-christmas-bombing-fallout-hillarys-visa-problem/#IDComment50958433</link>
<description>Hillary should have stayed in the Senate and tried to assume Ted Kennedy&amp;#039;s mantle as important power broker for the long haul.  Instead, she either thought she wouln&amp;#039;t be too old to run in 2016 (?!?) and woul dburnish her resum ein the meantime, or was counting on Obama being a one-termer and gabled that having some skin in the game would help position her to pick up the pieces with an &amp;quot;I told you so&amp;quot; campaign.  Instead IMO she has screwed up royally with her gamble -- Obama has pretty sucessfully marginalized her, appointing special enoys all around her, then when she has had the spotlight, she&amp;#039;s goofed up quite a bit (&amp;#039;reset&amp;#039; button etc).  She&amp;#039;s had just enough exposure to demonstrate that she&amp;#039;s not &amp;#039;&amp;#039;the world&amp;#039;s smartest woman&amp;quot; like her supporters seemed to think. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 8 Jan 2010 05:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/rgrenell/2010/01/07/more-christmas-bombing-fallout-hillarys-visa-problem/#IDComment50958433</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>