<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/479547</link>
		<description>Comments by nabejero</description>
<item>
<title>Cambodia Tales : Now required by the law: Wear a helmet!</title>
<link>http://www.cambodiatales.com/2009/02/26/now-required-by-the-law-wear-a-helmet/#IDComment18233129</link>
<description>your post just reminded me. the first part of my above comment didn&amp;#039;t paste, then i got cut off the internet before i could fix it. i was going to say:  compliance to the rule of law doesn&amp;#039;t auto-follow passed legislation. a perceived return is incentive for self-regulating behaviour eg protection of person and property-- if i follow the law it works both ways and i benefit from it through increased safety, security and prosperity. this is a luxury in thought pattern that come with time and economic progress. and then there are the practical constraints to this law being followed. (see post above).  nathalie </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 6 Apr 2009 06:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.cambodiatales.com/2009/02/26/now-required-by-the-law-wear-a-helmet/#IDComment18233129</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>