<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/778797</link>
		<description>Comments by muckeypuck</description>
<item>
<title>Geeks are Sexy Technology News : For the Space Exploration Haters</title>
<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2012/08/09/for-the-space-exploration-haters/#IDComment418605646</link>
<description>Colonize planets or force abortions, the choice is ours </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Aug 2012 17:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2012/08/09/for-the-space-exploration-haters/#IDComment418605646</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Geeks are Sexy Technology News : Darth Artoo [Pic]</title>
<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2011/09/29/darth-artoo/#IDComment389505655</link>
<description>wins the palm? pun intended? </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 02:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2011/09/29/darth-artoo/#IDComment389505655</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Geeks are Sexy Technology News : Maxim Hot 100 Goes Geek</title>
<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2012/05/22/maxim-hot-100-goes-geek/#IDComment367010964</link>
<description>I don&amp;#039;t know why the hate. Felicia&amp;#039;s hot. Surely there&amp;#039;s room for 99 other geeks, including felicia. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 13:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2012/05/22/maxim-hot-100-goes-geek/#IDComment367010964</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Geeks are Sexy Technology News : Drinking and Gaming: This Will End So Gloriously</title>
<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2012/05/11/drinking-and-gaming-this-will-end-so-gloriously/#IDComment358714584</link>
<description>*beercade </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 21:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2012/05/11/drinking-and-gaming-this-will-end-so-gloriously/#IDComment358714584</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Geeks are Sexy Technology News : Drinking and Gaming: This Will End So Gloriously</title>
<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2012/05/11/drinking-and-gaming-this-will-end-so-gloriously/#IDComment358714482</link>
<description>We have a bercade here in omaha. An old school arcade and they bring you drinks to your game! </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 21:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2012/05/11/drinking-and-gaming-this-will-end-so-gloriously/#IDComment358714482</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Geeks are Sexy Technology News : Science is Sexy: &quot;The Cure for Cancer&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/04/24/science-is-sexy-the-cure-for-cancer/#IDComment336726025</link>
<description>well, this is by far the most comments i&amp;#039;ve seen in awhile. hopefully that was the sign you were looking for to keep up the S.I.S. articles. good job! </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 12:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2009/04/24/science-is-sexy-the-cure-for-cancer/#IDComment336726025</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Journalism : Thursday Crib Sheet: RIP Andrew Breitbart, Susan Sarandon and OWS</title>
<link>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2012/03/01/thursday-crib-sheet-rip-andrew-breitbart-susan-sarandon-and-ows/#IDComment306329976</link>
<description>I wish i knew Andrew was looking for a punk rock conservative. i would of been proud to be a part of his team. I will definitely miss him </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Mar 2012 15:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/2012/03/01/thursday-crib-sheet-rip-andrew-breitbart-susan-sarandon-and-ows/#IDComment306329976</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Gingrich Eschews Rhetoric for Substance in CPAC Address</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/driehl/2012/02/10/gingrich-eschews-rhetoric-for-substance-in-cpac-address/#IDComment290037592</link>
<description>you should read about him. he just climbed everst with a broken leg. seems like quite a bit of fortitude to me   &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/223149/20111001/gary-johnson-2012.htm&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/223149/20111001/g...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/driehl/2012/02/10/gingrich-eschews-rhetoric-for-substance-in-cpac-address/#IDComment290037592</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Saturday Open Thread: Iran Edition</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2012/02/11/saturday-open-thread-iran-edition/#IDComment289770676</link>
<description>a-stinkn-men </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 15:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/publius/2012/02/11/saturday-open-thread-iran-edition/#IDComment289770676</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Gingrich Eschews Rhetoric for Substance in CPAC Address</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/driehl/2012/02/10/gingrich-eschews-rhetoric-for-substance-in-cpac-address/#IDComment289394207</link>
<description>i agree enough to give you a thumbs up except i don&amp;#039;t like santorum. in my opinion he is a &amp;#039;use big government to push my morals&amp;#039; liberal and i have a hard time with that. i mean we are trying to push politicians out of our doctors office. why in the hell would we invite them into our bedrooms? </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 05:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/driehl/2012/02/10/gingrich-eschews-rhetoric-for-substance-in-cpac-address/#IDComment289394207</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Gingrich Eschews Rhetoric for Substance in CPAC Address</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/driehl/2012/02/10/gingrich-eschews-rhetoric-for-substance-in-cpac-address/#IDComment289392370</link>
<description>Newt is probably the best of a bad lot. Why doesn&amp;#039;t breitbart give some coverage to gary johnson? all the positives of ron paul, plus positives where ron goes off the deep end. As an added bonus afaik, garys never had a klansman write for him </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 05:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/driehl/2012/02/10/gingrich-eschews-rhetoric-for-substance-in-cpac-address/#IDComment289392370</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Peace : &#039;Anonymous&#039; Threatens Crusade Against Israel: &#039;The People of This World Will Rise Against You&#039;</title>
<link>http://bigpeace.com/libertychick/2012/02/10/anonymous-threatens-crusade-against-israel-the-people-of-this-world-will-rise-against-you/#IDComment289179846</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;m thinking the mossad is probably way better at this game then they are. I predict a stuxnet variant that targets world of warcraft </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigpeace.com/libertychick/2012/02/10/anonymous-threatens-crusade-against-israel-the-people-of-this-world-will-rise-against-you/#IDComment289179846</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Santorum Delivers but Non-Binding Results Offer Little</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/jbradley/2012/02/08/santorum-delivers-but-non-bindnig-results-offer-little/#IDComment288287090</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;m just sayn, if making up your own mind really mattered, you&amp;#039;d find his quote offensive </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Feb 2012 22:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/jbradley/2012/02/08/santorum-delivers-but-non-bindnig-results-offer-little/#IDComment288287090</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Santorum Delivers but Non-Binding Results Offer Little</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/jbradley/2012/02/08/santorum-delivers-but-non-bindnig-results-offer-little/#IDComment287578075</link>
<description>&amp;ldquo;[Libertarians] have this idea that people should be left alone, be able to do whatever they want to do. Government should keep our taxes down and keep our regulation low and that we shouldn&amp;rsquo;t get involved in the bedroom, we shouldn&amp;rsquo;t get involved in cultural issues, you know, people should do whatever they want. Well, that is not how traditional conservatives view the world, and I think most conservatives understand that individuals can&amp;rsquo;t go it alone.&amp;rdquo; -Santorum   Looks exactly like a big government liberal to me </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Feb 2012 03:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/jbradley/2012/02/08/santorum-delivers-but-non-bindnig-results-offer-little/#IDComment287578075</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Geeks are Sexy Technology News : Mathematics Makes for Ugly Music</title>
<link>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2012/01/27/mathematics-makes-for-ugly-music/#IDComment276468845</link>
<description>i totally dig how he&amp;#039;s trying to rock that out and still look like a professional. it sorta reminds me of the old bugs cartoons. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 02:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2012/01/27/mathematics-makes-for-ugly-music/#IDComment276468845</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Peace : Shock Video: Sheep Beating Video With US Army Soldiers Watching Now Under Investigation</title>
<link>http://bigpeace.com/pschweizer/2012/01/19/shock-video-sheep-beating-video-with-us-army-soldiers-watching-now-under-investigation/#IDComment269075034</link>
<description>Soldier One &amp;quot;I am so frickn pumped for our BBQ tonight.&amp;quot;  Afghan with the bat &amp;quot;In our country it is a great honor to present the animal and its slaughter to our guests. Back in the nomadic days, offering up the freshest meat meant you only deserve the very best&amp;quot;  Soldier Two &amp;quot;Thanks! It really means alot to us.&amp;quot;  News Reporter &amp;quot;US Soldiers brutalize sheep to traumatize laughing afghan boy because they are all possessed by satan.&amp;quot;   - Dear Reporter Lady,  Why don&amp;#039;t you gear up and roll out. Show us how civil you idiots are when you&amp;#039;re fighting a war. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 23:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigpeace.com/pschweizer/2012/01/19/shock-video-sheep-beating-video-with-us-army-soldiers-watching-now-under-investigation/#IDComment269075034</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Fighting Back: Santorum Supporter Tells Heckler &#039;Go Smoke Your Weed Somewhere Else&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/fighting-back-santorum-supporter-tells-heckler-go-smoke-your-weed-somewhere-else/#IDComment258052374</link>
<description>Yea theres a huuuge gulf of difference between Larry Craig and Anthony Weiner or When the filibuster is appropriate or appointments without confirmation. The cause of the protests may be different but each groups claim to protections under the 1st is not. There is no &amp;quot;You must be right&amp;quot; requirement to have those protections afforded to you.  The difference is what side your on determines when something is acceptable and thats not much of a difference at all. Though i definitely give you kudos for at least attempting to justify a down vote </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 7 Jan 2012 23:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/fighting-back-santorum-supporter-tells-heckler-go-smoke-your-weed-somewhere-else/#IDComment258052374</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Fighting Back: Santorum Supporter Tells Heckler &#039;Go Smoke Your Weed Somewhere Else&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/fighting-back-santorum-supporter-tells-heckler-go-smoke-your-weed-somewhere-else/#IDComment258049616</link>
<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eD_ybaXhXno&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eD_ybaXhXno&lt;/a&gt;  Apparently judge napeletono agrees with me </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 7 Jan 2012 23:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/fighting-back-santorum-supporter-tells-heckler-go-smoke-your-weed-somewhere-else/#IDComment258049616</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Fighting Back: Santorum Supporter Tells Heckler &#039;Go Smoke Your Weed Somewhere Else&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/fighting-back-santorum-supporter-tells-heckler-go-smoke-your-weed-somewhere-else/#IDComment257742595</link>
<description>shrugs, i&amp;#039;m a big fan of the tea party and i thought bringing people to task at town halls were brilliant.  What annoys me is how conservatives and liberals are starting to sound the same, even if it is different      1. when conservatives protest the liberals say:   These protesters are fuddling up our democracy! they are completely unpratriotic.      2. conservatives respond:   It figures the left doesnt appreciate our first amendment either      1. when liberals protest conservatives say (see above)      2. liberals respond:   It figures the right doesnt appreciate our first amendment either      Exhibit 2:      1. Liberal - &amp;#039;The government really needs to step up and tax the rich more. the income gap is not fair&amp;#039;   2. Conservatives respond &amp;#039;Your morals are not my morals. The government should not be in the business of wealth redistribution.&amp;#039;      1.Conservative - &amp;#039;Weed is eviiiiiil mmmmkay. We should have the government spend millions on automatic weapons and personal attack vehicles (oh and drones too) for the police because i think its baaaad mmmkay&amp;#039;   2. liberals respond &amp;#039;Your morals are not my morals. The government should not be in the business of controlling our bodies.&amp;#039;      Exhibit 3:     1. liberal : My congressmen having sex with that guy in the bathroom was bad but cheating on your wife isnt a crime. he should stay to vote for - block - or caucus for &amp;lt;my pet issue&amp;gt;   2. conservative: what a moral failure. wtf, why hasnt he been impeached yet. this is exactly whats wrong with our government today      1. conservative: My congressmen having sex with that guy in the bathroom was bad but cheating on your wife isnt a crime. he should stay to vote for - block - or caucus for &amp;lt;my pet issue&amp;gt;   2. liberal: what a moral failure. wtf, why hasnt he been impeached yet. this is exactly whats wrong with our government today.      Exhibit 4      1. liberal - recess appointments are necessary to keep our government functional   2. conservative - recess appointments are another stretch of slippery slope chipping away at the fabric of our democracy      1. conservative - recess appointments are necessary to keep our government functional   2. liberal - recess appointments are another stretch of slippery slope chipping away at the fabric of our democracy      and so on and so forth.      Cant we just be the country we&amp;#039;re supposed to be without looking like a bunch of idiots in the process? </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 7 Jan 2012 15:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/fighting-back-santorum-supporter-tells-heckler-go-smoke-your-weed-somewhere-else/#IDComment257742595</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Peace : 2012 National Defense Authorization Act Assaults Constitutional Freedom</title>
<link>http://bigpeace.com/kpatton/2012/01/05/2012-national-defense-authorization-act-assaults-constitutional-freedom/#IDComment256308323</link>
<description>Anybody remember the John Warner Defense Authorization Act? They supposedly repealed the fema camp provisions but i can&amp;#039;t find anything to suggest its true. Every couple of years a major impeachment of our freedoms buried in 1000 page bills.   - a few years back a high ranking russian official predicted the united states would break up into as many as 5 countries. Seemed crazy at the time but if this is a u.n based plan maybe he knows something we don&amp;#039;t  To quote Florence and the Machine:  Can you hear the horses because here they come   </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 5 Jan 2012 23:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bigpeace.com/kpatton/2012/01/05/2012-national-defense-authorization-act-assaults-constitutional-freedom/#IDComment256308323</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>