<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/30201</link>
		<description>Comments by Mr. M.</description>
<item>
<title>View from a Farley : The Basics of Getting in Shape</title>
<link>http://www.viewfromafarley.com/2008/06/13/the-basics-of-getting-in-shape/#IDComment2410471</link>
<description>My apologies. I knew about squash, but I believe I selectively forgot in service to recruitment. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.viewfromafarley.com/2008/06/13/the-basics-of-getting-in-shape/#IDComment2410471</guid>
</item><item>
<title>View from a Farley : The Basics of Getting in Shape</title>
<link>http://www.viewfromafarley.com/2008/06/13/the-basics-of-getting-in-shape/#IDComment2410461</link>
<description>Thirty seconds of typing...starting...now... I&amp;#039;m not sure what your feelings about chess are, but fencing is often referred to as &amp;quot;physical chess.&amp;quot; I think that&amp;#039;s right on. It&amp;#039;s very much a thinking person&amp;#039;s game. I would imagine you might pin yourself as a thinking person. Meets, in general, take not much more time than practices, especially in the first year. And, hey, if you don&amp;#039;t like it much after that, then so be it. KM </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.viewfromafarley.com/2008/06/13/the-basics-of-getting-in-shape/#IDComment2410461</guid>
</item><item>
<title>View from a Farley : &lt;i&gt;The Catcher in the Rye&lt;/i&gt;</title>
<link>http://www.viewfromafarley.com/2008/06/24/the-catcher-in-the-rye/#IDComment2410411</link>
<description>He&amp;#039;s trying to work through some things, not the least of which is the loss of Allie.  He&amp;#039;s not moving forward -- you&amp;#039;re right. Think about why. Also, go back to times he completely freaks out about things...I imagine you&amp;#039;ll discover a bit of a pattern. KM </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.viewfromafarley.com/2008/06/24/the-catcher-in-the-rye/#IDComment2410411</guid>
</item><item>
<title>View from a Farley : &lt;i&gt;The Catcher in the Rye&lt;/i&gt;</title>
<link>http://www.viewfromafarley.com/2008/06/24/the-catcher-in-the-rye/#IDComment2388541</link>
<description>Hi, Chris, &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;So, I&amp;#039;ll begin by stating that I have &amp;quot;taught&amp;quot; Catcher in summer school for the past seven years. I won&amp;#039;t pretend to be an expert in it, but I have certainly read it a few times, at the very least. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;I&amp;#039;m struck by two things in your post: the struggling with the conversational nature (and I mean struggle in a sense of it preventing you from enjoying the text more) and the &amp;quot;wandering&amp;quot; nature of the journey Holden is on. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Remember that Holden is relating his journey in the context of psychoanalysis. That colors the way he&amp;#039;s approaching telling his tale. His repetition of phrases like &amp;quot;It really can,&amp;quot; etc., are him convincing himself of the veracity of his version of the story as much as the reader. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;The wandering nature is a large part of it: situate the tale against the prototype of adolescence, a wandering, meandering journey towards adulthood (and his resistance to &amp;quot;growing up&amp;quot; in many ways). There&amp;#039;s the central metaphor of the novel, which definitely informs this reading of the text. Essentially, he has no direction, so the story can;t take much of one. He&amp;#039;s too grounded in reliving the past (e.g.: Jane Gallagher and the checkers, Phoebe, the Museum of Natural History...) to have a clear goal for moving forward. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Anyway, I just thought I&amp;#039;d share some thoughts. I&amp;#039;m definitely willing to talk about your impressions of the book more! &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;KM </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 21:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.viewfromafarley.com/2008/06/24/the-catcher-in-the-rye/#IDComment2388541</guid>
</item><item>
<title>View from a Farley : Teachers&#039; First Names</title>
<link>http://www.viewfromafarley.com/2008/06/03/teachers-first-names/#IDComment2388421</link>
<description>Mr. Farley, &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;I read your post some time ago, but didn&amp;#039;t have a chance to immediately post a comment...but I still wanted to, even at this late date. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;I think you correctly question the use of the title as a sign of respect, and whether said respect should hinge on the use of the title. One would certainly hope not. I think that in most schools, though, it is more a matter of school culture, and what the administration feels is acceptable and/or what the majority of the body of the faculty feels is acceptable. You could, of course, continue to challenge just why a name would be acceptable or not. I, like Laurie noted above, began teaching while pursuing my Masters in Teaching as part of a three-teacher team, and the three of us decided to have our students call us by our first name. I saw no discernible difference between that setting and my next setting as teacher, a public high school in RI, where students used &amp;quot;Mr.&amp;quot; and my last name. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;I don&amp;#039;t know if it&amp;#039;s as purposeful as I&amp;#039;d like, but I often refer to students in class (I imagine you might have noticed) as Mr. or Ms. so-and-so. While in our setting calling me by my first name would not be viewed as acceptable, I think addressing students in that same &amp;quot;reverential&amp;quot; way can help bridge the gap somewhat. And hopefully, it&amp;#039;s just another way to show the respect of a teacher for students and their ideas and the value of their knowledge. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Best, &lt;br /&gt;Kyle </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 20:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.viewfromafarley.com/2008/06/03/teachers-first-names/#IDComment2388421</guid>
</item><item>
<title>View from a Farley : The Basics of Getting in Shape</title>
<link>http://www.viewfromafarley.com/2008/06/13/the-basics-of-getting-in-shape/#IDComment2388341</link>
<description>As per the US requirement, may I suggest a one-word winter solution? &lt;br /&gt;Fencing. :-)  (Maybe, just maybe, I&amp;#039;ll get you...and Mark, too?...to get into a sport I think you&amp;#039;d (both) be good at...) &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;KM </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 20:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.viewfromafarley.com/2008/06/13/the-basics-of-getting-in-shape/#IDComment2388341</guid>
</item><item>
<title>View from a Farley : Terror</title>
<link>http://www.viewfromafarley.com/2008/06/17/terror/#IDComment2388311</link>
<description>Interestingly, Chris (and others), I&amp;#039;m currently in the midst of taking a seminar run by Facing History and Ourselves (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.facing.org) &quot;&gt;http://www.facing.org) &lt;/a&gt;entitled &amp;quot;Holocaust and Human Behavior&amp;quot;. The organization&amp;#039;s purpose is probably clear enough just from its name, so I&amp;#039;ll leave it at that for the moment. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;In reading your post, I was simply brought to a lecture I listened to today by Bard College Professor Emerita Suzanne Vromen. She made many different points along the way, but she noted something interesting in speaking about how &amp;quot;terror&amp;quot; was one of the three means, as she identified them, by which the Nazis meant to rid Germany and German-occupied land of Jews. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;She brought up the fact that, prior to 9/11, she struggled with conveying to American students what it meant to live with, be exposed to (or, it could be argued, be manipulated by/with), terror. She noted that she had referenced the KKK and McCarthyism before, but clearly not with the same effect. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;While there is no tremendous point I&amp;#039;m making, this was something just on my mind as I read your post. Perhaps it speaks a bit to the idea that, for there to be truly a &amp;quot;terror&amp;quot; it has to be something that many have in common, and that we&amp;#039;re reminded of (perhaps simply through its connection to and through terror itself) regularly. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;KM </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 20:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.viewfromafarley.com/2008/06/17/terror/#IDComment2388311</guid>
</item><item>
<title>View from a Farley : Vacation!</title>
<link>http://www.viewfromafarley.com/2008/05/18/vacation/#IDComment1086111</link>
<description>As one of the people responsible for making you feel like you need to study inordinate amounts of time, let me be a bit of a voice of reason: go through the review sheets. Pick out only the items that you do not already feel you know and make flash cards for those &amp;ndash; and not everything. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Somehow I think you&amp;rsquo;ll be fine. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Other things: &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Mrs. B makes excellent points. Do listen. &lt;br /&gt;DC is great. While good ol&amp;rsquo; water is excellent and necessary, I support the DC. It&amp;rsquo;s the only reason I&amp;rsquo;m up now. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Mr. M. &lt;br /&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 20:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.viewfromafarley.com/2008/05/18/vacation/#IDComment1086111</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>