<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>gdp's Comments</title>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<link>https://www.intensedebate.com/users/1428713</link>
		<description>Comments by moviebren</description>
<item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Liberal Movie Critics Decry Pro-Military, Pro-American &#039;Act of Valor&#039;</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2012/02/24/liberal-movie-critics-decry-pro-military-pro-american-act-of-valor/#IDComment302982678</link>
<description>And you just proved yourself a troll.  You get nothing.  Now stop wasting my time and go do something useful like telling your friends to see the film. It won the weekend but the numbers are low.  It has to increase box office the second week in order to stay ahead of the newer films or it&amp;#039;ll fizzle and the producers won&amp;#039;t get funding for another movie.  The big picture. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2012/02/24/liberal-movie-critics-decry-pro-military-pro-american-act-of-valor/#IDComment302982678</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Liberal Movie Critics Decry Pro-Military, Pro-American &#039;Act of Valor&#039;</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2012/02/24/liberal-movie-critics-decry-pro-military-pro-american-act-of-valor/#IDComment302537248</link>
<description>What rock do I live under?  Hmmm....  Let&amp;#039;s see... It might be the masters in education in English I have, or the years studying Shakespeare and movies.  My decade in screenwriting, learning, creating, teaching and inspiring others to make better movies.  So you have a choice: you can remain the ignorant, feces-throwing troll that pretends mediocre films are great because they stroke your heart-strings and offend liberal Hollywood, and thereby remain muted and insignificant in the cultural conversation, or you can take my note, learn something, inspire better movies and actually make an impact in  our culture.   No, it poses no hard questions...   Because they&amp;#039;re already answered.  Like a samurai who considers himself dead when he goes to war, these SEALS KNOW -- and the audience knows if they know ABSOLUTELY ANYTHING about SEAL Team -- that they will put the mission above family issues, every time.    And the movie gives it exactly as much consideration as it deserves - under a minute. A newbie SEAL might spend the movie questioning his choices, and it would have greater impact on the audience. In The Godfather, Michael takes over 20 minutes to commit to killing his father&amp;#039;s enemies.  In Shawshank, Red takes an unknown but considerable time to break parole.    I could go on for hours but I shouldn&amp;#039;t have to.  That Seal&amp;#039;s decision surprised no one. It was obvious, and he made it long before the movie started.  God bless him for it but it wasn&amp;#039;t hard.  Go back and read the analysis again.  I&amp;#039;m talking about bigger things than your simple visions of sacrifice.  I&amp;#039;m talking about inspiring a nation to do the same.  And make better movies. Thus endeth the lesson. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 05:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2012/02/24/liberal-movie-critics-decry-pro-military-pro-american-act-of-valor/#IDComment302537248</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Liberal Movie Critics Decry Pro-Military, Pro-American &#039;Act of Valor&#039;</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2012/02/24/liberal-movie-critics-decry-pro-military-pro-american-act-of-valor/#IDComment301569009</link>
<description>No, you&amp;#039;re wrong, and your argument is full of straw men.  The reason why SOOOOOO many critics have panned it is not all because of bias. Some, yes.   It&amp;#039;s easy to resent the MSM (as I do) but if you don&amp;#039;t consider the bigger storytelling perspective, you&amp;#039;ll never change anyone&amp;#039;s mind.  And your movies will stay in the ideological ghetto.  You adore the story because it strokes a particular cord with you, its moral sense, the nobility of the Seals,  the sacrificial nature of their service.  God bless them,  but that doesn&amp;#039;t elevate the storytelling.    It is a story of a mission and people gave their lives.  The action gives it wide appeal those who like that action but it gives little else to those who don&amp;#039;t.  It poses no hard questions.  It does not challenge the audience, but merely holds up Seals as heroes.   Adding elements that deepen character or expand theme does not cheapen a story but gives it even wider appeal.  It makes it a BETTER story.  And that keeps it in the theaters and the public consciousness longer. </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 22:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2012/02/24/liberal-movie-critics-decry-pro-military-pro-american-act-of-valor/#IDComment301569009</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Liberal Movie Critics Decry Pro-Military, Pro-American &#039;Act of Valor&#039;</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2012/02/24/liberal-movie-critics-decry-pro-military-pro-american-act-of-valor/#IDComment300919947</link>
<description>Patriotism, jingoism and MSM bias aside, we still have storytelling concerns with Act of Valor.  For analysis:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bren.us/act-valor-or-why-hollywood-supposedly-hates-america&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.bren.us/act-valor-or-why-hollywood-sup...&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 00:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/cftoto/2012/02/24/liberal-movie-critics-decry-pro-military-pro-american-act-of-valor/#IDComment300919947</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Perry: Romney, Paul Have &#039;Interesting Partnership&#039; During Debates</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/perry-romney-paul-have-interesting-partnership-during-debates/#IDComment300103947</link>
<description>I can&amp;#039;t believe Fox News is talking about Newt dropping out, that he&amp;#039;s leaning back during the debate and all.  He WON the debate.  Carry on.  It only makes us stronger. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 23:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/perry-romney-paul-have-interesting-partnership-during-debates/#IDComment300103947</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Poll: 50% Believe Obama&#039;s First Term A Failure</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/poll-50-believe-obamas-first-term-a-failure/#IDComment300084124</link>
<description>Clearly the other 50% didn&amp;#039;t understand the question. </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 22:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/poll-50-believe-obamas-first-term-a-failure/#IDComment300084124</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Shapiro: Why The Left Worships Government </title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/shapiro-why-the-left-worships-government/#IDComment299162310</link>
<description>But to be a true believer in the state IS to be stupid, ignorant and corrupt.  And yes, the price will be very high indeed.  Liberals have to realize that the tax system is not designed for social engineering but for raising money to fund government.  The right question is not how to fleece the rich to pay for the government, but how pull in sufficient funds.  This means STOP thinking about tax RATES and think of REVENUES.  But here&amp;#039;s the problem: a government that borrows 40% of what it spends is spending too much.  The rich CAN&amp;#039;T cover that spread.  There isn&amp;#039;t enough money.  Period.  You can&amp;#039;t tax enough to create balancing revenues without destroying our economic system.  So, the ONLY alternative is to LOWER SPENDING..    And to do that, we need a new president.   Obozo will never learn. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 19:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/shapiro-why-the-left-worships-government/#IDComment299162310</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Newt: If Mitt Loses Michigan, He&#039;s Done</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/newt-if-mitt-loses-michigan-hes-done/#IDComment297448481</link>
<description>I think we have to get over this concept of Romney inevitability.  Imagine for a moment that the presumptive GOP heir LOSES to a more populist Newt or Santorum. That would have a interesting effect on the electorate.  Yes, I know the arguments against them and I&amp;#039;ve stopped caring.    Romney&amp;#039;s negative campaign is making everyone weary of this election cycle.    I want an ideological candidate who is tough on foreign policy, smart on economics, light on social issues (for big tent reasons), and yes, one who is admittedly bad at golf.  We already got someone lousy at foreign policy, stupid on economics, strong on social engineering, and seemingly decent at golf.  He has to go.  ABO </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 20:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/newt-if-mitt-loses-michigan-hes-done/#IDComment297448481</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Government : Big Oil Wants to Kill the Keystone XL Pipeline</title>
<link>http://biggovernment.com/cstreet/2012/02/17/big-oil-wants-to-kill-the-keystone-xl-pipeline/#IDComment295025340</link>
<description>Wait, Chriss, the whole thrust of this article is supposition. You have several paragraphs of setting, relating the price of oil in comparison to other things, but you haven&amp;#039;t made any direct connection to Big Oil.  You might be right but Big Gov has more push than Big Oil. </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 18:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://biggovernment.com/cstreet/2012/02/17/big-oil-wants-to-kill-the-keystone-xl-pipeline/#IDComment295025340</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Holder To Puerto Rican Congressman: &#039;Wherever You&#039;re From&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/holder-to-puerto-rican-congressman-wherever-youre-from/#IDComment282527167</link>
<description>OMG, it&amp;#039;s like watching a comedy routine, like &amp;#039;Buck&amp;#039; Turgidson dressing down the president in Dr. Strangelove.   This bozo is in charge of a DOJ who fagged out of a Black panther voter-tampering CONVICTION, who then sold illegal guns to Mexican drug cartels in a political move to squash our 2nd Amendment rights, that ended up with the deaths of hundreds of Mexicans and at least one US border agent, and who now thinks he&amp;#039;s not getting the respect he deserves for doing what HE considers a good job!  Look, I don&amp;#039;t care where you&amp;#039;re from, Idaho or wherever, but can we get above the name-calling?  Calling me incompetent (for being incompetent) isn&amp;#039;t going to strengthen our relationship, and I TRY to treat you (nimrod) senators with respect.  And I resent that you think I&amp;#039;m running cover for the president,  I mean, that kind of partisan badmouthing in an election year, well, that&amp;#039;s just disgraceful.  &amp;quot;This is supposed to be a happy occasion!  Let&amp;#039;s not bicker and argue about who killed who...&amp;quot; </description>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Feb 2012 05:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/holder-to-puerto-rican-congressman-wherever-youre-from/#IDComment282527167</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Congresswoman Shames Holder: &#039;How Many More&#039; Agents Have To Die &#039;For You To Take Responsibility?&#039;</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/congresswoman-shames-holder-how-many-more-agents-have-to-die-for-you-to-take-responsibility/#IDComment282277124</link>
<description> The arrogance!  Does he think that an appointed stooge head of DOJ doesn&amp;#039;t have to answer to a congressman in an official hearing?  And the gall to lecture her about election year politics and what a fine job he&amp;#039;s doing?  He&amp;#039;s doing a damn fine job of stonewalling to give cover for Obama.  He won&amp;#039;t be in power forever...  Please, when can we rendition this traitor?  </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 2 Feb 2012 23:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/congresswoman-shames-holder-how-many-more-agents-have-to-die-for-you-to-take-responsibility/#IDComment282277124</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : No One Watching His Show Didn&#039;t Stop Politico from Anointing Colbert &#039;King of 2012 Comedy!&#039;</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2012/02/02/no-one-watching-his-show-didnt-stop-politico-from-anointing-colbert-king-of-2012-comedy/#IDComment282105161</link>
<description>Colbert&amp;#039;s showing himself part of the liberal machine with his latest misreading of scripture to conflate Jesus with the welfare state.  Debunked here: &lt;a href=&quot;http://bren.us/false-piety-entitlement&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://bren.us/false-piety-entitlement&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 2 Feb 2012 20:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2012/02/02/no-one-watching-his-show-didnt-stop-politico-from-anointing-colbert-king-of-2012-comedy/#IDComment282105161</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Obama: Jesus Would Tax The Rich</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/obama-jesus-would-tax-the-rich/#IDComment282103565</link>
<description>This is almost identical to fake-GOP Progressive Stephen Colbert&amp;#039;s false reading of scripture, debunked here: &lt;a href=&quot;http://bren.us/false-piety-entitlement&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://bren.us/false-piety-entitlement&lt;/a&gt; </description>
<pubDate>Thu, 2 Feb 2012 20:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/obama-jesus-would-tax-the-rich/#IDComment282103565</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Good News: Hollywood Wants to Screw Up &#039;Death Wish&#039;</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2012/01/30/good-news-hollywood-wants-to-screw-up-death-wish/#IDComment278903113</link>
<description>A new version would be a hack job because we&amp;#039;re not in 1970s NYC.  NYC today is pretty safe.  We fear Islamic terrorism today.  Back then, drug violence and bad law was the norm.  Today we have the occupy movement lead by the unions and Soros that are advocating violence in the cause of socialism.  You think Hollywood is going to tackle that?  No.    So the story will ring false and it will perpetuate the false pagan belief in vengeance as the answer to every problem. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2012/01/30/good-news-hollywood-wants-to-screw-up-death-wish/#IDComment278903113</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : What Shoulda Won? 2000 Best Picture Academy Award</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ccannon/2012/01/29/what-shoulda-won-2000-best-picture-academy-award/#IDComment278396968</link>
<description>My Best list for 2000: 1.   Almost Famous 2.   Billy Elliot 3.   Gladiator 4.   O Brother, Where Art Thou? 5.   Malena Then,  Meet the Parents,   You Can Count on Me,  Traffic  </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 07:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/ccannon/2012/01/29/what-shoulda-won-2000-best-picture-academy-award/#IDComment278396968</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : &#039;Warrior&#039; Blu-ray Review: Intensely Moving, Beautifully Acted Sports Drama </title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2012/01/18/warrior-blu-ray-review-intensely-moving-beautifully-acted-sports-drama/#IDComment267872319</link>
<description>It&amp;#039;s this generation&amp;#039;s Rocky.  A powerful movie that beat through most fight tropes and left me a blubbering, applauding mess at the end.  In fact, it pitted two different fight tropes against each other, allowing us to wonder which one would prevail.  And in the center, Nick Nolte, one of his best performances ever, and he really deserves a best supporting actor nod.  That said, I wanted a bit more of a wrap up.  How does the money get spent?  Do the brothers reconcile with the father?  If they&amp;#039;re not going to use the &amp;quot;death of the trainer/father&amp;quot; trope, you might as well play that card.  Perhaps they left that for the sequel. </description>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 17:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2012/01/18/warrior-blu-ray-review-intensely-moving-beautifully-acted-sports-drama/#IDComment267872319</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Top 10 Power Pop Albums of 2011</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/mbaron/2012/01/14/top-10-power-pop-albums-of-2011/#IDComment266037534</link>
<description>Thanks for the recommend.  Skeleton Staff has fun melodies, worth considering.  Scary&amp;#039;s not impressing me yet. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/mbaron/2012/01/14/top-10-power-pop-albums-of-2011/#IDComment266037534</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : &#039;Killer Elite&#039; Blu-ray Review: Great Actors, Premise Squandered In Weak Execution</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2012/01/15/killer-elite-blu-ray-review-great-actors-and-premise-squandered-in-weak-execution/#IDComment265496392</link>
<description>Muddled story.   Is it a &amp;quot;Commando&amp;quot;-revenge story to save DeNiro or something else?  It can&amp;#039;t decide whether Statham or Owen is really running things, and I&amp;#039;m getting bored with Statham&amp;#039;s indestructibility.   The story&amp;#039;s only saving grace is Yvonne Strahovski.  The 70s one with Caan/Duvall is better, though it came out as ninjas were getting in vogue so the story took an odd turn.  Read the book instead.  And BTW, the killers are ALL British in the book. </description>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 03:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/jjmnolte/2012/01/15/killer-elite-blu-ray-review-great-actors-and-premise-squandered-in-weak-execution/#IDComment265496392</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Big Hollywood : Top 10 Power Pop Albums of 2011</title>
<link>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/mbaron/2012/01/14/top-10-power-pop-albums-of-2011/#IDComment264630061</link>
<description>Wow, you&amp;#039;ve managed to find a bunch of bands who sound EXACTLY THE SAME.  They might be cover bands for each other from what I heard.  Got something that sounds unique, fresh, dynamic? </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 03:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/mbaron/2012/01/14/top-10-power-pop-albums-of-2011/#IDComment264630061</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Breitbart.tv : Heated Exchange Between Paul And Gingrich Over Military Service</title>
<link>http://tv.breitbart.com/heated-exchange-between-paul-and-gingrich-over-military-service/#IDComment258888431</link>
<description>I&amp;#039;ve been listening to Ron Paul since 2007.  He&amp;#039;s an isolationist with NO understanding of foreign policy in the modern world and his beliefs on our wars are VERY evident.  I stand by my statements and Ron Paul is the WORST in this GOP field because of it.  OBAMA is better at foreign policy than Ron Paul, and Obama has been disastrous!   Anyone but Obama.  Anyone who will stop Obamacare.   That is one reason to vote for Ron Paul, but thankfully there are far better candidates on that stage.   We shouldn&amp;#039;t settle for him.  He&amp;#039;s not electable.  And if you don&amp;#039;t recognize that, you haven&amp;#039;t been listening. </description>
<pubDate>Sun, 8 Jan 2012 22:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
<guid>http://tv.breitbart.com/heated-exchange-between-paul-and-gingrich-over-military-service/#IDComment258888431</guid>
</item>	</channel>
</rss>